And the Longines logo. And the white paint creeping up the sides of the applied indexes and numerals.
Like seriously did they *Make* the logo? is it blobbed on paint? solder? what IS that? it cant be a filled down real one they are already way to slim... stamped gold / silver arent they? like breitling wings? i always assumed dont actually know. But that is just blobly
Should be pretty obvious
Guys (and girls), please describe why you think they are redials. It is not so "obvious" to those wanting learn.
Over time, one develops a certain familiarity with the design language of original dials. .
Showing a bunch of dials and declaring they are redials is not instructive. A direct comparison of an authentic dial with a redial with some description of the difference would be much more beneficial. An excellent example is @DIV thread. Sorry for the hard criticism but, to be frank, wanting to learn, this Longines thread has been more an exercise in frustration than illumination.
Guys (and girls), please describe why you think they are redials. It is not so "obvious" to those wanting learn.
I don't know, that last Longines would have fooled me. The logo and the military numbers look so genuine. Maybe the outer track has been touched up?
Subdials say redial, otherwise gorgeous watch.
https://www.chrono24.com/longines/f...-30ch-in-18k-rosegold-von-1958--id5785050.htm
If you are referring to the 23M, take another look at signature. It leaves a lot to be desired.
I would say that the outer track is another hint but the subdials are just awful. Edit: I have added a comparison with what looks to be an original dial. I should state that the chrono sec hand looks unusually black and the sub-dial hands are inverted.
The one I was referring to had no subdials. The inner military markers are red and there is no ebay link.