Beware: Problem Longines watches

Posts
3,773
Likes
20,187
So I'm seeing sub dial registers as the give away. Am I right? Plus position of outer scale?
The "Longines" looks bad to me.

And is that running seconds hand supposed to be that long?
 
Posts
7,611
Likes
21,829
So I'm seeing sub dial registers as the give away. Am I right? Plus position of outer scale?
And the Longines logo. And the white paint creeping up the sides of the applied indexes and numerals.
 
Posts
13,039
Likes
51,986
Got the white paint on the second one but also think applied bits are too close to the bezel. Both are horrible.
 
Posts
972
Likes
1,018
And the Longines logo. And the white paint creeping up the sides of the applied indexes and numerals.
Like seriously did they *Make* the logo? is it blobbed on paint? solder? what IS that? it cant be a filled down real one they are already way to slim... stamped gold / silver arent they? like breitling wings? i always assumed dont actually know. But that is just blobly
 
Posts
7,611
Likes
21,829
Like seriously did they *Make* the logo? is it blobbed on paint? solder? what IS that? it cant be a filled down real one they are already way to slim... stamped gold / silver arent they? like breitling wings? i always assumed dont actually know. But that is just blobly
Actually I didn't mean the metallic logo proper but the black ink Longines signature.
 
Posts
2,311
Likes
6,628
Should be pretty obvious
Guys (and girls), please describe why you think they are redials. It is not so "obvious" to those wanting learn.
 
Posts
2,770
Likes
4,816
Guys (and girls), please describe why you think they are redials. It is not so "obvious" to those wanting learn.
It is not always easy to articulate. Over time, one develops a certain familiarity with the design language of original dials. I started this thread to hopefully prevent people from purchasing redials and possibly internalize what forms they come in. To authenticate, one must study original dials. But this is only possible if one is told which dials are original and which are not, whilst learning. This thread was meant to do the latter but not necessarily the former.

I do apologize for any condescension though.
 
Posts
2,311
Likes
6,628
Over time, one develops a certain familiarity with the design language of original dials. .
Showing a bunch of dials and declaring they are redials is not instructive. A direct comparison of an authentic dial with a redial with some description of the difference would be much more beneficial. An excellent example is @DIV thread. Sorry for the hard criticism but, to be frank, wanting to learn, this Longines thread has been more an exercise in frustration than illumination.
 
Posts
13,039
Likes
51,986
Actually I kinda like being pushed to figure out the issue. Builds BS radar.
 
Posts
2,770
Likes
4,816
Showing a bunch of dials and declaring they are redials is not instructive. A direct comparison of an authentic dial with a redial with some description of the difference would be much more beneficial. An excellent example is @DIV thread. Sorry for the hard criticism but, to be frank, wanting to learn, this Longines thread has been more an exercise in frustration than illumination.
Appreciate the criticism. Will edit a few of the older posts with an image of a correct dial for comparison and attempt to do the same in the future.

Edit: Unless @LarryS objects.
 
Posts
13,039
Likes
51,986
No feel free to illuminate. 😜

I do appreciate the Longines education and advice. As it's become a bit of an obsession, perhaps I need to buy a bible.
 
Posts
972
Likes
1,018
Guys (and girls), please describe why you think they are redials. It is not so "obvious" to those wanting learn.
45% paranoia 45% superstition 10% accuracy
 
Posts
311
Likes
130
I don't know, that last Longines would have fooled me. The logo and the military numbers look so genuine. Maybe the outer track has been touched up?
 
Posts
2,770
Likes
4,816
I don't know, that last Longines would have fooled me. The logo and the military numbers look so genuine. Maybe the outer track has been touched up?
If you are referring to the 23M, take another look at signature. It leaves a lot to be desired.
I would say that the outer track is another hint but the subdials are just awful. Edit: I have added a comparison with what looks to be an original dial. I should state that the chrono sec hand looks unusually black and the sub-dial hands are inverted.
Edited:
 
Posts
311
Likes
130
If you are referring to the 23M, take another look at signature. It leaves a lot to be desired.

I would say that the outer track is another hint but the subdials are just awful. Edit: I have added a comparison with what looks to be an original dial. I should state that the chrono sec hand looks unusually black and the sub-dial hands are inverted.

The one I was referring to had no subdials. The inner military markers are red and there is no ebay link.

Interesting, of the two images you show, the one on the left has a doctor's dial and the one on the right has a tachymeter.
 
Posts
2,770
Likes
4,816
The one I was referring to had no subdials. The inner military markers are red and there is no ebay link.
I apologize for the lack of clarity on my part. The one you are referring to is original and for reference. The one above it is the redial.