Forums Latest Members
  1. Wongo Jul 19, 2015

    Posts
    511
    Likes
    482
    dxholdren likes this.
  2. JohnSteed Jul 19, 2015

    Posts
    4,402
    Likes
    5,763


    Chris - amazing Connie, well done & congrats!!

    And your photography skills ... very nice capture of the details. Your pics certainly do the watch justice :thumbsup:

    Spencer
     
  3. cristos71 Jul 19, 2015

    Posts
    7,157
    Likes
    32,938
    Thank you very much :)

    What I find amazing about these old textured dials is the quality of the printing. When a watch like this is under a loupe it is clear to see but most of the time in photo´s that just doesn´t come across very well and that is what I tried to emphasize.

    The printing is so sharp on what appears to a very awkward surface. I would love to learn more about the process used back in the 1950´s to achieve this result.
     
    Edited Jul 19, 2015
    JohnSteed likes this.
  4. wwhntr Jul 19, 2015

    Posts
    542
    Likes
    365
    14k 2652, cal 354. I believe to be non refinished dial image.jpg image.jpg
     
    dxholdren, noelekal, OMGRLX and 8 others like this.
  5. mactab Jul 21, 2015

    Posts
    110
    Likes
    103
    Pie Pan 168.0005 564 Cal. 1968
    just purchased IMG_2828.JPG
     
    E39Talon, noelekal, ossfm and 12 others like this.
  6. BartH Follows a pattern of overpaying Jul 21, 2015

    Posts
    1,770
    Likes
    7,686
    Terrific example. I too need a SS.
     
  7. Sgt_Bilko Jul 22, 2015

    Posts
    520
    Likes
    2,501
    A 1966 Cal 564 with a recessed crown.

    IMG_7444.jpeg IMG_7430.jpeg
     
    OMGRLX, noelekal, ossfm and 8 others like this.
  8. Apa Jul 22, 2015

    Posts
    180
    Likes
    341
    One is cal 354 from1952, and the other just is.... 20140921_122734.jpg
     
    noelekal, OMGRLX and Peemacgee like this.
  9. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Jul 22, 2015

    Posts
    5,157
    Likes
    7,886
    you don't have to shoot them both in soft focus -the 'other one' will never know.......;)

    give us some decent pics of your 1952 Connie
     
  10. Apa Jul 22, 2015

    Posts
    180
    Likes
    341
    She is a kind of shy after "watchmaker" raped her dial years before i save her....

    I try to take better pics later.
     
  11. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Jul 22, 2015

    Posts
    5,157
    Likes
    7,886
    aah bless....
    (after the 'other one' has gone to bed?) ::screwloose::
    :)
     
    Apa likes this.
  12. Apa Jul 22, 2015

    Posts
    180
    Likes
    341
    A IMG_2815.JPG little better?
     
    OMGRLX, noelekal, GregH and 1 other person like this.
  13. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Jul 22, 2015

    Posts
    5,157
    Likes
    7,886
    much better -thank you
    feel free to post pics of the medallion, case back and movement if you have them
     
  14. Apa Jul 22, 2015

    Posts
    180
    Likes
    341
    Like this? This was my wifes grandfathers watch IMG_2789.JPG
     
    OMGRLX likes this.
  15. Apa Jul 22, 2015

    Posts
    180
    Likes
    341
    And this? IMG_2790.JPG
     
    OMGRLX likes this.
  16. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Jul 22, 2015

    Posts
    5,157
    Likes
    7,886
    yep -just the ticket
    nice family heirloom to keep a hold of
    does the inscription say 1957?
    if that is a 9M serial number it appears to date it to around 1950
     
  17. Apa Jul 22, 2015

    Posts
    180
    Likes
    341
    14m....
     
  18. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Jul 22, 2015

    Posts
    5,157
    Likes
    7,886
    that makes more sense -more like '56 then -fits with the 57 date
     
  19. TNTwatch Jul 22, 2015

    Posts
    2,876
    Likes
    1,950
    This is the latest 2648 I've seen. Most of them have the serial in the 12-13M range. The vertical line of the cross-hair looks to be off center though.
     
  20. BartH Follows a pattern of overpaying Jul 22, 2015

    Posts
    1,770
    Likes
    7,686
    I think it's an old redial.