The most collectible modern Omega watch is...

Posts
126
Likes
324
Mitsukoshi buddy
There are only 300 true Mitsukoshi's out there and you usually only see one come up every year or so... was lucky enough to snag one.
 
Posts
390
Likes
439
Whelp...I guess I gotta go against the grain on most collectible modern Omega offering. Has anyone noticed that on the normal-people-internet-accessible marketplaces (no one here need apply) that: Whenever Planet Oceans are for sale, they are mostly the huge ones? More and more the "42mm" (41.5mm) Planet Oceans are becoming increasingly rare on the open market. Sometimes we get so caught up with the current fad(s) that we think the fad is the wave of the future. Usually it is really just a spike in sales that people will look back on and say "I cannot believe I wore bell bottoms that huge!". Any fad that defies practicality will eventually fade. Silly plastic crystals, exposed, vulnerable bezels, anything impractical will eventually fade. (There are some exceptions, but they are not the rule) What endures is timeless, efficacious design. The 42mm Planet Oceans, recently out of production, were focussed designs. The amagnetic materials in the movement (where do you think the beta testing of METAS offerings were accomplished?), with the Si14 balance spring, understated matte gray ceramic bezel, glare-reducing textured dial, high contrast indices and hands, glare-reducing coatings on the crystal, and perfect size will all contribute to make the 42mm PO a modern classic. It is understated and doesn't scream "LOOK AT ME!" Get them while you can...they are disappearing while ya'll aren't watching.
Edited:
 
Posts
390
Likes
439
I think the snoopy will be a money maker in the future. Thats the only thing i really see as making big bucks in the future. also I think the 2254 will also increase its value.
If we concentrate on monetary gain alone, then we truly are not talking "collectible", but rather we are talking about "sell-able". Selling for profit is being a merchant, it is not being a collector. ;-)
 
Posts
680
Likes
754
(where do you think the beta testing of METAS offerings were accomplished?)
In the Aqua Terra line with the 8508/8500G?

Other watches got the 8500B before the PO, FYI.
 
Posts
390
Likes
439
In the Aqua Terra line with the 8508/8500G?

Other watches got the 8500B before the PO, FYI.

OMG!! My world just ended!!
You obviously missed the point.
BTW...Although the sales manual says there was an 8500G... There is no special designation nor any identifier on the movement that definitively says so. The manual also says the 8500g had special parts in it. Research indicates all those parts had been incorporated as running changes in the 8500, culminating in the 8500B. This is why there is no difference in warranty lengths between the 8500B and the METAS 8500B. The only significant difference is the METAS testing. (Yes, I know the shape/color of 2 parts changed).
 
Posts
680
Likes
754
OMG!! My world just ended!!
You obviously missed the point.
BTW...Although the sales manual says there was an 8500G... There is no special designation nor any identifier on the movement that definitively says so. The manual also says the 8500g had special parts in it. Research indicates all those parts had been incorporated as running changes in the 8500, culminating in the 8500B. This is why there is no difference in warranty lengths between the 8500B and the METAS 8500B. The only significant difference is the METAS testing. (Yes, I know the shape/color of 2 parts changed).
The difference is actually more than cosmetic, the material of parts changed to make them magnetically inert in the 8500G.

Oh, and it definitely says the version of the movement on the baseplate, as seen below near the balance wheel:

 
Posts
4,851
Likes
70,331
Ree Ree
Any thoughts on this one? Word around only 285pcs were ever produced. And personally I find the blue hands very appealing.
http://www.fratellowatches.com/omega-speedmaster-professional-moonphase/

Pic from https://omegaforums.net/threads/18k...ster-pro-moonphase-3689-30-31-full-set.34534/
I am pretty attached to mine and find it hard to imagine selling it as it is the watch I wore to my wedding and will be wearing out for our anniversary on Wednesday😀

Edited:
 
Posts
390
Likes
439
The difference is actually more than cosmetic, the material of parts changed to make them magnetically inert in the 8500G.

Oh, and it definitely says the version of the movement on the baseplate, as seen below near the balance wheel:


No, the palette and the cog were already amagnetic in the "B" model with the Si14 balance spring preceding the >15,000 Gauss models.
Have a watchmaker dissemble your 8500B and use a magnet on those parts if you don't believe me. OR...use a powerful electromagnet and test it. The change in color & shape was likely done for show...in fact, customers had field tested the materials and design for years before it was marketed. The newest versions seem to have a "dust cover" over pertinent movement parts. Since >60% of all warranty work (Omega's numbers, not mine) were due to magnetization, this makes perfect sense. Keep the watches from coming through the repair facility's door in the first place.

Additionally, I own the Aqua Terra 42mm Master Co-axial (231.10.42.21.03.003) and the Planet Ocean 42mm (232.30.42.21.01.001). The place where you THINK there is a 8500B designation on the plate, on BOTH OF MY WATCHES HERE WITH ME it has the Greek symbol for omega, and beneath that symbol is the word "OMEGA" in all capital letters. I believe the company genuinely planned on making a "G" but realized it was unnecessary, then never retracted the documents they had already issued. A change in designator of the version (E.g. "A" to "B") is only done when the parts are no longer completely interchangeable (Omega company words, Omega company policy). The wonderful pictures you posted, I have seen a few times before, and all of them are meaningless as they are 8500A and are therefore not germane to this discussion.
 
Posts
390
Likes
439
I am pretty attached to mine and find it hard to imagine selling it as it is the watch I wore to my wedding and will be wearing out for our anniversary on Wednesday😀

Beautiful watch. I love the hint of blue.
 
Posts
444
Likes
1,282
I am pretty attached to mine and find it hard to imagine selling it as it is the watch I wore to my wedding and will be wearing out for our anniversary on Wednesday😀

That's awesome!
Btw since you've been collecting for a longer time, have you ever heard of a 'more official' production numbers? I'm just curious as I've bought one too.
 
Posts
4,851
Likes
70,331
Ree Ree
That's awesome!
Btw since you've been collecting for a longer time, have you ever heard of a 'more official' production numbers? I'm just curious as I've bought one too.
I believe that sources from Omega have quoted approximately 285 were produced.

Cheers
 
Posts
27,676
Likes
70,314
Research indicates all those parts had been incorporated as running changes in the 8500, culminating in the 8500B.

Please post the research in support of this thanks.

No, the palette and the cog were already amagnetic in the "B" model with the Si14 balance spring preceding the >15,000 Gauss models.

Those are not the only 2 parts that change for the G revision...

in fact, customers had field tested the materials and design for years before it was marketed.

Once again, would love to see the evidence of this...

I'm not sure where you are getting all this information from, but it directly contradicts the evidence at hand.
 
Posts
390
Likes
439
Please post the research in support of this thanks.



Those are not the only 2 parts that change for the G revision...



Once again, would love to see the evidence of this...

I'm not sure where you are getting all this information from, but it directly contradicts the evidence at hand.

1. Please list all the part names and part numbers that did change, and the purpose of the change. Explain in detail the application of the "G" suffix, where/how to identify it, and which model(s) it appeared in. If you can find any 8500 that has a stamped/engraved plate other than the one saying 8500A, tell us and we will all know. (E.g. 8500B, 8500G). I have found none after a year of research. This is personal, hands-on, eyeballing research. (Primary source) THE EVIDENCE IN MY HAND TELLS ME THE 8500B IN BOTH MY WATCHES SAYS "OMEGA" NOT "8500B".
2. The 2 parts I picked on were specifically noted in the video to roll out ">15,000 gauss" technology. These parts were already nickel-phosphorous (Through secondary source research, extensive articles online). Take a magnet and use it to pick up a nickel. Let us all know your results. (Primary source research). I am WELL aware many things changed, but the fact remains, the parts are interchangeable or the designation (C, G) would be clear and evident.
3. Chevrolet did not tell the world they were using a Cadillac V6 (albeit modified) for their base Camaro motor. They just did it and people figured it out later. Customers doing testing without their knowledge. (although the LFX motor did not need testing, the application did)
4. If I quote all sources and footnote/endnote as well as a bibliography, I would have another Master's Thesis. I have already been there, done that. If you don't believe me, provide the information you have PRIMARY SOURCE access to and prove me wrong. Otherwise use your brain and think it through and do your own research (you will never believe me anyway as you already have proven).

All of the is because I nominated a non-speedmaster as "collectible".
 
Posts
27,676
Likes
70,314
1. Please list all the part names and part numbers that did change, and the purpose of the change. Explain in detail the application of the "G" suffix, where/how to identify it, and which model(s) it appeared in. If you can find any 8500 that has a stamped/engraved plate other than the one saying 8500A, tell us and we will all know. (E.g. 8500B, 8500G). I have found none after a year of research. This is personal, hands-on, eyeballing research. (Primary source) THE EVIDENCE IN MY HAND TELLS ME THE 8500B IN BOTH MY WATCHES SAYS "OMEGA" NOT "8500B".
2. The 2 parts I picked on were specifically noted in the video to roll out ">15,000 gauss" technology. These parts were already nickel-phosphorous (Through secondary source research, extensive articles online). Take a magnet and use it to pick up a nickel. Let us all know your results. (Primary source research). I am WELL aware many things changed, but the fact remains, the parts are interchangeable or the designation (C, G) would be clear and evident.
3. Chevrolet did not tell the world they were using a Cadillac V6 (albeit modified) for their base Camaro motor. They just did it and people figured it out later. Customers doing testing without their knowledge. (although the LFX motor did not need testing, the application did)
4. If I quote all sources and footnote/endnote as well as a bibliography, I would have another Master's Thesis. I have already been there, done that. If you don't believe me, provide the information you have PRIMARY SOURCE access to and prove me wrong. Otherwise use your brain and think it through and do your own research (you will never believe me anyway as you already have proven).

All of the is because I nominated a non-speedmaster as "collectible".

Well, lots of hostility for simply asking you to show what you claimed to have learned. There's no need to yell, to tell me use my brain, or otherwise be rude thanks...rather than see this as some sort of challenge if you are open minded you may actually learn something as a result of this discussion, but of course that is in your hands.

I'll address you last statement first about nominating something other than a Speedmaster - personally I have no dog in the fight of what the most collectible modern Omega is. I have little interest (from my own personal collector point of view) in the vast majority of Modern Omegas, so I don't really care what the end result of this discussion is with regards to that issue. However I do care about facts from a technical nature, which is why I asked you to provide some evidence. Customarily the one making the claim is the one to provide evidence of that claim. Saying "I have researched it and you will have to prove me wrong" is not evidence, even though it is a popular approach on watch forums.

Also please keep in mind I asked about specific claims, so assuming I disagree with everything you have written would be a poor assumption on your part.

The differences between the 8500 A and B versions are listed in the technical guide. Only 2 parts change between the A and B revision, and they are:

1 - Main plate changes from 7228500A1002007 to 7228500B1002007 - reason stated is "Engraved new execution" which refers to the movement revision level marked on the main plate. There is an Omega symbol and "Omega" under it - more on this topic later.

2 - Balance changes from 7228500A4005119 to 7228601A4005119 - noted at steel to Si14

If we now move to the 8500G revision, the following parts change:

1 - Main plate is now 7228508G1002007 - Omega symbol and word are now removed from the main plate.

2 - Balance - 7228508G4005119 - staff material changes to Nivagauss on the G version.

3 - Balance cock - changes from 7228500A1005818 to 7228508G1005818.

4 - Mainspring barrel 1 changes from 7228500A20010 to 7228508G20010.

5 - Mainspring barrel 2 changes from 7228500A20011 to 7228508G20011.

6 - Mainspring 1 changes from 7228500A20101 to 7228508G20101.

7 - Mainspring 2 changes from 7228500A2010019 to 7228508G2010019.

8 - Co-axial wheel (what you refer to as "the cog") changes from 7228500A30040 to 7228508G30040 - two lower levels of the co-axial wheel made of non-ferrous material on the G version.

9 - Pallet fork changes from 7228500A40010 to 7228508G40010 - fork and staff made of non-ferrous material on the G version.

10 - Upper shock assembly changes from 7228500A70530 to 7228508G70530.

11 - Lower shock assembly changes from 7228500A70531 to 7228508G70531.

12 - Upper shock spring changes from 7228500A78004 to 7228508G78004 - shock absorber spring is made of amorphous material on the G version.

13 - Lower shock spring changes from 7228500A78005 to 7228508G78005 - shock absorber spring is made of amorphous material on the G version.

Can you please show a close photos of the area near the balance on the watches you have in hand? I'm interested in the area to the left of the balance...you may be able to see an alpha-numeric code there.

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
17,635
Likes
26,752
Outside any version drama. 2500d 42mm first Gen PO's have the most upside. They are the thinnest and are minimally visually different from the 2nd gen.

I'm not saying it's going to turn profits, but down the road I think the first gens will be held in higher regard.
Edited:
 
Posts
363
Likes
450
This one is sure to bring me big profits!

Omega-Seamaster-Planet-Ocean-2907-50-91-limited.jpg