Should I sell my FOIS and get a Speedy Pro?

Posts
799
Likes
722
I think both are equal and very different at the same time. I'd actually like to own both.
I have the original but if I owned the FOIS I wouldn't go crazy trying to sell it.
 
Posts
2,510
Likes
3,733
I personally think the single greatest tick against the FOIS is the sapphire crystal. If it were hesalite I think it would look amazing with vintage re-lume job. I won't ever be able to afford an actual Ed White - just too many other financial priorities in life.
 
Posts
4,877
Likes
31,864
I personally think the single greatest tick against the FOIS is the sapphire crystal.

Same with the sapphire on the meteorite speedy, they really should have done that one with the hesalite.
 
Posts
1,134
Likes
1,690
I agree, same with the 50 anniversary patch speedy...should've been hesalite...
 
Posts
263
Likes
1,534
I think both are equal and very different at the same time. I'd actually like to own both.
I have the original but if I owned the FOIS I wouldn't go crazy trying to sell it.

I'm lucky enough to have an early 80s speedmaster on its way to me right now. I'll see which one I prefer but will hopefully be unable to choose and end up keeping both 😀 Will be surviving on bread and water for the next few months 😲
 
Posts
258
Likes
219
I think you will love the 80s one, it will Probably have nice warm patina and you will never look back.
 
Posts
257
Likes
273
It's sort of weird how everyone wants a Speedmaster with patina and they feel that's the way it looks best or has some sort of vintage look to it. If you'd have bought a Speedmaster in the 50's or 60's etc. I'd imagine it would have been bright sterile white at the time of purchase and for a decade or so like luminova is today.

They were designed to be bright white and only went brown and yellow because tritium wasn't a good enough material to keep it's original look so it decayed over time. Patina is basically a defect but some people find it aesthetically interesting.
 
Posts
263
Likes
1,534
It's sort of weird how everyone wants a Speedmaster with patina and they feel that's the way it looks best or has some sort of vintage look to it. If you'd have bought a Speedmaster in the 50's or 60's etc. I'd imagine it would have been bright sterile white at the time of purchase and for a decade or so like luminova is today.

They were designed to be bright white and only went brown and yellow because tritium wasn't a good enough material to keep it's original look so it decayed over time. Patina is basically a defect but some people find it aesthetically interesting.

The same applies to most collectable objects. A vintage Bugatti was found at the bottom of a lake in Switzerland a few years ago (the original owner hid it there for tax reasons). It was recovered in completely unusable condition but still fetched a quarter of a million euros at auction. I will always prefer an original condition classic car with well maintained mechanicals to a concours restoration job.

You're buying into the lifestyle of the previous owners. Sure you can also buy a new object and create your own story but some folks like to build on an existing history. We're more custodians taking care of them for the next generations than outright owners.
 
Posts
2,043
Likes
5,505
The same applies to most collectable objects. A vintage Bugatti was found at the bottom of a lake in Switzerland a few years ago (the original owner hid it there for tax reasons). It was recovered in completely unusable condition but still fetched a quarter of a million euros at auction. I will always prefer an original condition classic car with well maintained mechanicals to a concours restoration job.

You're buying into the lifestyle of the previous owners. Sure you can also buy a new object and create your own story but some folks like to build on an existing history. We're more custodians taking care of them for the next generations than outright owners.

I have a fairly good Idea of my response to someone who suggests that I'm a custodian rather than an owner of my watches. As a small hint, it will not be " Absolutely correct old chap" and may include an instruction to go forth and multiply (perhaps delivered in industrial language) 😜
 
Posts
2,510
Likes
3,733
I have a fairly good Idea of my response to someone who suggests that I'm a custodian rather than an owner of my watches. As a small hint, it will not be " Absolutely correct old chap" and may include an instruction to go forth and multiply (perhaps delivered in industrial language) 😜

How does one multiply with oneself?
 
Posts
263
Likes
1,534
Two weeks until I pick up my new old watch. Counting down the days...
 
Posts
214
Likes
286
I have a fairly good Idea of my response to someone who suggests that I'm a custodian rather than an owner of my watches. As a small hint, it will not be " Absolutely correct old chap" and may include an instruction to go forth and multiply (perhaps delivered in industrial language) 😜
This seems a bit strange to me. Assuming you’re not immortal and/or your watches aren’t disposable and are in your possession then you must (by definition) be the custodian of your watches.

You might consider yourself the owner or you might see ownership from a more transient perspective. it’s quite possible that your watches will survive longer than you, and perhaps even the next generation, IDK 😕
Edited:
 
Posts
31
Likes
87
You have 2 wrists. Keep the Wally Schirra watch because this is the watch that took Omega into outer space and beyond. Also get a speedy moon for the other wrist.
 
Posts
886
Likes
2,975
Why not try it?

Neither of these watches will be hard to sell or hard to buy again if you want to go back to the FOIS down the road.

My thinking on watch collecting is to buy, sell and keep in nearly equal measure - buy carefully, try things out you think you might like and sell if you don’t. In terms of modern dive watches alone, I’ve owned a 14060 Sub, a 300M Bond, a Bvlgari Scuba, a different style of 300M Bond, a Seiko SKX and now I’m on a 300M 2254.50. The rest I’ve sold or am selling. I like the 2254.50 - but if I ever get tired of it, it’ll be sold and I’ll try something else. That’s part of the fun of this hobby.

I say sell the FOIS and try something else! You can always go back!
 
Posts
263
Likes
1,534
Why not try it?

Neither of these watches will be hard to sell or hard to buy again if you want to go back to the FOIS down the road.

My thinking on watch collecting is to buy, sell and keep in nearly equal measure - buy carefully, try things out you think you might like and sell if you don’t. In
I say sell the FOIS and try something else! You can always go back!
Why not try it?

Neither of these watches will be hard to sell or hard to buy again if you want to go back to the FOIS down the road.

My thinking on watch collecting is to buy, sell and keep in nearly equal measure - buy carefully, try things out you think you might like and sell if you don’t. In terms of modern dive watches alone, I’ve owned a 14060 Sub, a 300M Bond, a Bvlgari Scuba, a different style of 300M Bond, a Seiko SKX and now I’m on a 300M 2254.50. The rest I’ve sold or am selling. I like the 2254.50 - but if I ever get tired of it, it’ll be sold and I’ll try something else. That’s part of the fun of this hobby.

I say sell the FOIS and try something else! You can always go back!

Well, it wasn't much of a contest, an easy win for the vintage speedy. The FOIS is already on its way to a new home (to sit alongside a 1983 pepsi gmt!)

 
Posts
1,094
Likes
5,727
Some years ago I wanted a vintage speedy bad was cheap and got a Speedy MKII because it was cheaper in price than a Vintage moon watch that I really wanted was never happy. Went to a NAWCC Reginal in Pasadena some one had 4-6 vintage moon watches for sell think I paid 1400.00 then I was happy and sold the vintage MKII . Just follow your gut.
AHLsMvh.jpg