This is a great thread, so I'd like to start off by raising hat to the OP and all responders! I had similar questions/hesitations about reluming so I won't drown the forum with another thread about it
😀
Personally, considering that all hands still contain tritium in the Speedy of OP (and that indexes are still quite ok), my preference would be to leave it as-is. Just like
@janice&fred et al., I'd rather the original state of the lumes. I personally don't use the vintage watches on daily basis and don't expect them to keep perfect time or glow in the dark to check out the time in the night (man, I merely look at my watch to check the time!!). So if the lumes are still intact despite losing some glow etc, I'd keep a 60 yr old vintage with its original, cancerogenous, radioactive Tritium no matter what.
With all above being said, I've also been thinking a lot about the pros and cons of reluming lately. As you might know, I
've recently got myself my first Omega (an Auto SMDV) for which I'd like to thank all forumers once again for all the knowledge & expertise I gained through OF!
My watch also has some original Tritium content on the hands but unfortunately, the lume on the minute hand is entirely gone whereas the hour hand still stands. The watch is currently getting a full service and reluming is also covered in the charge. So I was considering getting both hands relumed (since, obviously, getting only the minute hand relumed would be pointless). The watchmaker didn't want to touch the dial so there will be no reluming on index pointers etc.
I wonder if you guys would also have different opinions about reluming when the watch hands/dial partially loses the lume/tritium?