Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
dinner plate sized belt buckle hits muddy pick up truck heading to a BBQ place to drink dr pepper before fixin' to go then lake in their Texas flag swim trunks to discuss the 2nd ammendment with their UT football buddies who are putting fixins on their burgers off the texas themed grill which is still cooking 10 degrees warmer than the temperature at noon
Rolex on your wrist? - “Yes, ma’am” and “Yes, sir” responding to their parents while tipping their hat
Well this thread got derailed good and quick... thanks for the chuckles, fellas!

Well, to be fair, threads like these really aren't taken very seriously, and many members are tired of speculating about future value. And then when you insulted Rolex owners, that was the kiss of death. You might have better luck at watchuseek.![]()
To me it’s a Dunning–Kruger problem. The OP doesn’t know enough to know what he already thinks is wrong, and that the video is clearly wrong.
Well, to be fair, threads like these really aren't taken very seriously, and many members are tired of speculating about future values. And then when you insulted Rolex owners, that reduced the chances of success even further. You might have better luck at watchuseek.![]()
No, no, I think I belong on the Omega Forum, considering I only collect Omega watches. In case you missed it, I previously posted that I have a particular bond with Omega for personal reasons. If the skin around here is so thin that a simple joke ruffled some panties, I think the problem is oversensitivity (and perhaps a little bit of guilty conscience, too 😜 )
Anyways, I come in peace, I didn't intend to start a war with a harmless joke.
When a guy younger than some of my shoes with a vested interest in pumping the market auhooritatively says "going to double," and "gonna go through the roof," "ALL V. 72 chronos will go through the roof" as though he has information we don’t really loses me early in the video.
...and 16550 is not "a couple year" watch
I was also making a joke with my WUS reference, and not about you, just about this topic. It's sort of a running gag that threads like these are "Watchuseek threads." Also, threads that ask "how does this watch look on my wrist?" and "should I buy this watch?" and "what color strap should I put on this watch?"
I have a single Rolex (SkyDweller with polished links), a receding hairline (I’m looking at it now in my SkyDweller), 30 other watches that aren’t Rolex, and a Ford F-150.
Need instruction on my identity, please!
🤔
You said it, not me. Guilty conscience perhaps? 😁
If the skin around here is so thin that a simple joke ruffled some panties, I think the problem is oversensitivity (and perhaps a little bit of guilty conscience, too 😜 )
Fair enough. To be honest I'm not familiar with the guy in the video. It popped up on my feed and he click baited the shit out of me with his Speedmaster in the thumbnail (Omega fiend, I know). Honestly I have a little bit of knowledge with vintage Omegas, not much, but I have absolutely NO knowledge about Rolex prices (other than I can't afford them), so I can't comment on that.
That's twice that you made this weird comment to me about a guilty conscience. I honestly don't know what you're talking about, but both times it was in the context of Rolex owners, so it feels like you're trying to get in a dig, while then including a cute emoticon to say "no offense".
Setting aside everything else, I do find interesting the notion of the Tritium vs Luminova crossover as it relates to collector desirability in the distant future.
Lume patina obviously plays a sizable roll in current vintage watch collecting today. But how might that morph in the next 20 years (when 2000 models are 40 years old)? Won’t it have to?
Or as some have seem to have suggested in this thread, with the number of watches available post-2000s, does that alone take general wind out of the hobby altogether - leaving folks scrapping over increasingly fewer pre-2000s?