Can anyone talk me out of buying this 145.022-69?

Posts
2,086
Likes
2,897
The dial is stunning. The case and bezel are good and the 1039 / 506 bracelet is included (even if not perfect). If the movement was fine, I guess I would take this watch after having negotiated the price and try to source a better caseback, a crown and a set of tritium hands. If I was ending up at $6k, that would still be fair for me.
 
Posts
268
Likes
273
Is the flash in the photos or that watch has been extremely polished?

Dial looks amazing!

the rest has been said. 4.5K maybe
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,936
If the seller had it serviced prior to sale, I would ask if their watchmaker returned the parts to them or if they could get the original hands back. They may not think they are desirable.
If the watch hasn’t been serviced (with paperwork proving it, add another $5-700, plus a replacement caseback and sourcing period hands...it’s all adding up to be worth more than the watch....and you have an overpolished case
 
Posts
123
Likes
543
Do you know if it’s polished?

Best, Matth

Yea just by looking at it. 50 year old watches don't look that good. 😉
 
Posts
2,306
Likes
5,640
DNN bezel looks good and I think that's correct for a 3059xxxx.
It's not. 3059xxxx is 220 serial range. Service Lumi hands. Drag mark on running seconds subdial. Case is way over polished. Pass on this.
 
Posts
2,169
Likes
6,750
As most folks have intimated, I'd pass on this watch for reasons stated.

Be patient, hang around this forum and you'll see very nice examples come up for sale from trusted members. This is not a hard to come by reference, it's probably one of the most produced of it's kind (pre-moon) to commemorate the lunar landing in '69.
 
Posts
307
Likes
566
In the close-up pictures I think I can see a hint of gouge marks in the small seconds sub-dial...
 
Posts
5,859
Likes
16,770
It's not. 3059xxxx is 220 serial range.

Yes but not all 3059xxxx have a 220 bezel.
I have a 30596xxx with a 220 bezel and
30593xxx without.
 
Posts
2,306
Likes
5,640
30593xxx without.
That's because somebody swapped it out at some point. 30593xxx is also 220 range.
 
Posts
5,859
Likes
16,770
That's because somebody swapped it out at some point. 30593xxx is also 220 range.

No way a DON bezel could have wandered into that particular watch? It’s very close to the MWO “up to around” upper DON ceiling of 30588xxx. I’m thinking outlier😀
Edited:
 
Posts
2,306
Likes
5,640
No way a DON bezel could have wandered into that particular watch? It’s very close to the MWO “up to around” upper DON ceiling of 30588xxx. I’m thinking outlier😀
Just got one with a 220. 30.593.5xx serial.
 
Posts
5,859
Likes
16,770
Just got one with a 220. 30.593.5xx serial.

Ok. My Don example is a bit earlier, 305932xx.
 
Posts
2,306
Likes
5,640
Ok. My Don example is a bit earlier, 305932xx.
So we might have just found the DON > DNN 220 cutoff point within ~300 numbers...
 
Posts
123
Likes
543
It's not. 3059xxxx is 220 serial range. Service Lumi hands. Drag mark on running seconds subdial. Case is way over polished. Pass on this.

What is the cause of the drag mark out of curiosity? Bad service hand or bad installation?
 
Posts
468
Likes
1,322
So we might have just found the DON > DNN 220 cutoff point within ~300 numbers...
Om that note. I got this info from @speedy4ever in a previous post on this forum:

More important is to consider the production date. Of the several hundreds 145.022-69 we have in our database, the relationship between production date and bezel type is rather clear:
- DON (type B1) until September/October 1970
- 220 (type B2bis) from end August 1970 to end December 1970 (possibly until January 1971 with new data we had, still to be verified)
- type B2 from November 1970


I have a 30992xxx that has a DNN bezel. It has a EoA from 4th of November 1970.
 
Posts
174
Likes
148
The bracelet and endlinks alone are prob worth $2000. Question is how much does the overpolishing and incorrect hands detract from the value of the watch?