DonovanMartin
·I've been offered the chance to trade my -69 Speedmaster (There is an extensive thread on this site about mine) for a 1999 Rolex Sub, two line, no date 14060. I love the Speedy but have always entertained the thought of finding one from my birth year, which would be a -66 model. Those are not cheap.
My -69 has an extract date of July 4, 1969.
From a financial standpoint Rolex seems to always sell for more than what I have(-69).
From a "what I love" standpoint, the speedy is amazing, especially with the date of two weeks before the moon landing. But this one was not the end goal. I could walk away from this one and fill the speedy void with a newer one for a while and keep my eyes out for one.
I like the simplicity of the two line rolex since it looks more like the vintage models than the newer maxi case Rolexes.
I posted this on another site that leans more to the Rolex although there were a few Speedy fans. Most said trade. I know I'm a little off balance for even entertaining this thought.
Don't butcher me to hard: What are your thoughts?
My -69 has an extract date of July 4, 1969.
From a financial standpoint Rolex seems to always sell for more than what I have(-69).
From a "what I love" standpoint, the speedy is amazing, especially with the date of two weeks before the moon landing. But this one was not the end goal. I could walk away from this one and fill the speedy void with a newer one for a while and keep my eyes out for one.
I like the simplicity of the two line rolex since it looks more like the vintage models than the newer maxi case Rolexes.
I posted this on another site that leans more to the Rolex although there were a few Speedy fans. Most said trade. I know I'm a little off balance for even entertaining this thought.
Don't butcher me to hard: What are your thoughts?

