Anybody owns both Moonwatch variants (Hesalite & Sapphire)

Posts
147
Likes
484
So my Speedy (3861 Sapphire w/bracelet) has become my favorite watch in my collection...I rotate it, but wear it 4-5 days each week.

I've been running scenarios in my head if I should get the Hesalite (w/ strap) and use it more as a dress watch (nice dinners & events) so I can use the Sapphire for everyday use since the crystal is more robust (dings, desk diving, etc..).

The Hesalite also makes the dial pop and you also got that nice distortion that the box sapphire cannot achieve.....in addition, I can equip each with different straps and wear the one that strikes my fancy that morning/event, probably reducing the frequency of swapping straps and scratching the inner surfaces of the lugs.....

I've read the threads about owning multiple Speedmasters, but just curious if a few people get both Moonwatches as I described above ...or get a different color dial Speedy for their second option....

Feel free to post pics and thanks in advance for your replies....
 
Posts
6,015
Likes
20,683
This should be your dress speedy. If I had to have only one watch (which is ridiculous), it would be this one.

Only thing is it doesn't have the hesalite you want:

 
Posts
532
Likes
347
It's funny you say that, I actually use my Hesalite Speedmaster (3572.50), usually on a Komfit or leather deployant, as my daily wear. I enjoy getting the little marks on the crystal, most of which can be polished out with polywatch. My Sapphire Sandwich just feels like more of a dress watch (probably because I keep it on the OEM metal bracelet).
 
Posts
151
Likes
254
I know this is a watch forum and we’re all slightly mad here, but I think I’d consider an alternative like a Globemaster, a Reverso, or giving five grand to charity before I went for two almost identical (I know, I know) watches.
 
Posts
30
Likes
47
I know this is a watch forum and we’re all slightly mad here, but I think I’d consider an alternative like a Globemaster, a Reverso, or giving five grand to charity before I went for two almost identical (I know, I know) watches.
+1 there are simply too many other watches to enjoy to buy two Speedys.. doing so just sounds so boring.
 
Posts
4,693
Likes
17,769
For a while I did own a steel bracelet + croc strap 1861 (both hesalite). The main reason was to see the new and now defunct huge box. I sold the leather strap version towards a Trinity Seamaster and have a Globemaster for my modern dress watch now. I hate changing straps but from experience two identical Speedmasters is not the way to go - better to change straps.
The last picture below shows the difference Sapphire to Hesalite (middle watch is the Sapphire sandwich) so there is a case to have both / it is a different experience and aesthetic. Also you have the applied and printed logo difference.
.
Edited:
 
Posts
16,856
Likes
47,859
The last picture below shows the difference Sapphire to Hesalite (middle watch is the milky ring) so there is a case to have both / it is a different experience and aesthetic. Also you have the applied and printed logo difference.
.

FIFY

😁
 
Posts
2,008
Likes
3,386
I've been running scenarios in my head if I should get the Hesalite (w/ strap) and use it more as a dress watch (nice dinners & events) so I can use the Sapphire for everyday use since the crystal is more robust (dings, desk diving, etc..)

I’ve worn my hesalite 1861 practically everyday for nigh on five years now and the only thing that’s suffered, especially from desk diving, is the bracelet clasp. The crystal is still going strong, the odd scuff polished off with polywatch or toothpaste, whichever is closest to hand. There’s a nice selection of other watches around, I can’t get my head around having two watches that are almost identical apart from the glass (though the applied logo on the new model is nice, I guess)
 
Posts
126
Likes
245
IMO, there isn't enough differentiation between the Hesalite and Sapphire models to justify owning both. If you really want to stay in the Speedmaster family I suggest you look at the racing models or a LE.
 
Posts
7,106
Likes
23,081
IMO, there isn't enough differentiation between the Hesalite and Sapphire models to justify owning both.

The cornerstone of collector rationalization is the justification of more watches based on the tiniest bit of minutiae. What are you trying to do here, drive people to therapy?
 
Posts
1,301
Likes
2,576
If, like me, you're married and your wife asks you to dress up for "nice dinners & events" and you wear what to most people looks like the same watch you wear every day, that's hardly going to earn you points for effort. I'd go with something different for your dress watch, and not a chronograph. Another way to look at this is that you'll probably come to appreciate a 2nd watch that's noticably different to your everyday wearer and you won't get this with two subtly different Speedmasters.
 
Posts
244
Likes
2,227
I would buy two similar Moonwatches because I want them, but I won’t consider either of them a dress watch. If I’m going dressy I’ll choose a simple dial three hander. But that’s just my personal opinion. There don’t seem to be any rules for fashion anymore. Wear whatever you want for whatever reasons make you happy
 
Posts
10,302
Likes
16,123
I know this is a watch forum and we’re all slightly mad here, but I think I’d consider an alternative like a Globemaster, a Reverso, or giving five grand to charity before I went for two almost identical (I know, I know) watches.
I have and Ed White and a FOIS, so in a sense, Hesalite and Sapphire versions of the same watch, and also a gold Reverso. Does this make me a bad person?
 
Posts
9,529
Likes
52,501
Technically speaking, the sapphire version is not a moonwatch per se because NASA did not approve a sapphire crystal due to concerns that if it shattered during spaceflight there would be tiny shards of glass floating around the cabin in zero gravity. Now, sapphire fans, please don't go off on me because I agree that the sapphire version has exactly the same internal DNA as the traditional hesalite version. I want to love the sapphire version, I really do, but I just can't get past that milky ring. Why can't Omega make a sapphire version of the Speedmaster without that ring? Doesn't seem to be a problem with other Omega models - my SMPc, for example. All that being said, nothing wrong with owning multiple Speedmasters. I have two hesalite Speedies in my collection. Love 'em both.
 
Posts
4,693
Likes
17,769
Technically speaking, the sapphire version is not a moonwatch per se because NASA did not approve a sapphire crystal due to concerns that if it shattered during spaceflight there would be tiny shards of glass floating around the cabin in zero gravity. Now, sapphire fans, please don't go off on me because I agree that the sapphire version has exactly the same internal DNA as the traditional hesalite version. I want to love the sapphire version, I really do, but I just can't get past that milky ring. Why can't Omega make a sapphire version of the Speedmaster without that ring? Doesn't seem to be a problem with other Omega models - my SMPc, for example. All that being said, nothing wrong with owning multiple Speedmasters. I have two hesalite Speedies in my collection. Love 'em both.

I have been deep down that rabbit hole in the past and I have to report that there is no evidence Hesalite was an original selection requirement - but it is probably a lucky extra feature. The fact is Sapphire watches are used on the ISS also shows there is no embargo on them in space....
While Hesalite may have some beneficial failure mode characteristics, it was a lucky coincidence and not part of the selection or test criteria for the Speedmaster.

https://omegaforums.net/threads/sha...election-myth-maybe.91611/page-2#post-1190781
 
Posts
9,529
Likes
52,501
Ah, good to know and I stand corrected. Thank you. But I still hate the milky white ring. 🙁
 
Posts
4,693
Likes
17,769
Ah, good to know and I stand corrected. Thank you. But I still hate the milky white ring. 🙁

I think you are in the majority on both counts - the Hesalite myth has got a lot of traction over the years. Also I blame you for pushing me towards a modern Ed White now / no ring and Sapphire :0)
 
Posts
9,529
Likes
52,501
I think you are in the majority on both counts - the Hesalite myth has got a lot of traction over the years. Also I blame you for pushing me towards a modern Ed White now / no ring and Sapphire :0)
Unfortunately, I'm in the same camp on the modern Ed White. Just what I need, another Speedmaster. Good Lord.
 
Posts
2,586
Likes
2,870
Rolex collectors are like "I have the Sub, Sub date, Hulk, Starbucks, steel Pepsi on oyster, Batman, and Bluesy. My collection is diversified."

Speedy collectors are like "No need to get a Sapphire Sandwich and a Hesalite. They're way too similar."