The New 2021 Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch (Sapphire)

Posts
368
Likes
253
Already offered a small discount at my AD. This is will be standard production model for years....discounts will be flowing within a year!!
So I'll wait 2022 to buy this one 馃榾

@Caliber561 Thank you for the wristshots!
 
Posts
355
Likes
455
Already offered a small discount at my AD. This is will be standard production model for years....discounts will be flowing within a year!!

Caliber561's review convinced me, very well done and appreciated.
I contacted my AD and placed an order, the new Metas movement, thinner case and a bracelet I might actually be able to wear convinced me. Went with sapphire instead of Hesalite because I plan to wear it much more often and the exhibition back with the new movement was a must. Purchased a full Moonwatch package in 2018 from this AD, it's going to cost about $3100+tax to make the jump so apparently there's some decent retained value. Hopefully will take delivery within 30 days or so. FINALLY a Speedy that hacks!
Edited:
 
Posts
1,502
Likes
2,571
OP do you notice that the new watch has much sharper edges on the sides of the case and the lugs (super noticeable when examine the watch for the caseback side. The edges lack the finesse and slight rounding if the 1861 outgoing model.

I鈥檓 not sure I like the case finishing much.

-Freq

I'm not quite sure what you mean by "sharper edges on the sides of the case." I also don't really know what you mean by the "finesse and slight rounding of the 1861." Could you give an example of that?
 
Posts
355
Likes
455
OP do you notice that the new watch has much sharper edges on the sides of the case and the lugs (super noticeable when examine the watch for the caseback side. The edges lack the finesse and slight rounding if the 1861 outgoing model.

I鈥檓 not sure I like the case finishing much.


-Freq
I compared the pictures and the case contour and shape/edges are virtually identical to my Speedmaster 38, which wears very comfortably, so, I'll just have to wait and see
 
Posts
1,502
Likes
2,571
I鈥檓 comparing to the 1861 .005 outgoing hesalite 42mm reference vs the new hesalite moonwatch.

The difference is huge between the two in my examples (both unworn and in plastics).


-Freq
Well, I looked closely at both my new Speedmaster and the Speedyorite, and I think the perceived softness in the outgoing model may have to do with the bottom of the case being polished. Geometrically, the 2021's lower edge is beveled slightly, which I suspect is meant to ensure the case doesn't cut into one's wrist when the watch is worn tightly. That said, the way the lugs flare out more like the old models probably makes the lugs look sharper, especially as the tips come down to more defined points. Personally, one of my chief dislikes about the modern Speedmasters were that the case geometries had a profile that was clearly flattened out versus their vintage counterparts. The thin brushed sides reminded me of an overpolished vintage case, but that little nitpick has been done away with now. In any case, the sharper appearance of the 2021 suggests to me a higher-quality finishing process, as I personally know that it can be very hard to preserve sharp edges when processing a metal component that has to be polished. There's probably more to it than that, but in short, I still believe that the new case feels much more comfortable than the outgoing variant, case sharpness and all. I also feel it looks much better, more faithful to the unpolished 105.012s out there.

When I have some time this weekend, I'll try to set things up so I can capture some close-up comparison shots.

On a somewhat unrelated note, I had some time to pop off the bezel for this model, and the construction of the new bezels are completely new. Omega now uses a replaceable gasket (the grey thing) rather than a direct interference fit between the bezel and case.

I don't know why this change was implemented, but I suspect it probably improves the serviceability of the watch, as the old Speedmaster case did wear if the bezels were removed frequently. Although this could be addressed by a watchmaker sizing the bezel, as Archer has suggested in another thread, this probably makes the whole process easier via the replacement of the gasket. I also noticed that the bezel was much harder to take off, probably because of the gasket, so that may be another reason this change was made.

The aluminum insert can actually be popped out of the bezel quite easily, and snapped back in place like those on vintage Rolexes. To my knowledge, they were previously glued in place, or not removable at all, so this is an interesting change.

@cvalue13 It also seems that the crystal is slightly cantilevered, which may be a factor that affects the prominence of the milky ring, a topic that you have explored with a lot of depth.
 
Posts
316
Likes
205
Thank you OP for the detailed post
Strongly considering the new 3861
 
Posts
3,773
Likes
8,554
Personally I love the polished bracelet, but for those who are in two minds, or prefer the brushed look, simply reverse the bracelet. The inside links are exactly the same as the brushed bracelet and if you want it 100% brushed then just buy the brushed end pieces (much cheaper than a new bracelet). Thanks Omega for the quick change act - master stroke.

" @cvalue13 It also seems that the crystal is slightly cantilevered, which may be a factor that affects the prominence of the milky ring, a topic that you have explored with a lot of depth." I believe that Omega has used some kind of "black" coating to minimise the milky ring effect,