What modern Omega watches have increased in value?

Posts
223
Likes
304
Only problem with those is that on the tritium model the fried egg lume often seems to fade a lot more than the hands on those leading to an unbalanced look IMO. I personally prefer the uniformity of the later Superluminova models like the 2254/2255 or post 1997 2351

I too think the 2201.50 PO is an under appreciated future classic in waiting.
 
Posts
9,932
Likes
15,602
Nope, stunning dials
M
Nope you disagree that it often happens like I suggest (beige plots but greener hands), or nope you like them regardless?

I just tried a search on "tritium 2531" and got plenty of hits looking like this, most I have seen end up like this, with mismatched hands and lume, which is a shame. To be clear, this isn't usually a result of a hand change, they just fade differently, many Pre-Bonds did the same:

Edited:
 
Posts
15,048
Likes
24,025
Apollo 11 35th
11500-14500 😲

Wonder how to evaluate my #0011 (no not for sale)😀

Box and papers of course ...
 
Posts
27,966
Likes
71,290
Nope you disagree that it often happens like I suggest (beige plots but greener hands), or nope you like them regardless?

I just tried a search on "tritium 2531" and got plenty of hits looking like this, most I have seen end up like this, with mismatched hands and lume, which is a shame. To be clear, this isn't usually a result of a hand change, they just fade differently, many Pre-Bonds did the same:

I've never seen a 25318000 with tritium where the hands look anything close in colour to the dial you have shown. What you posted is very typical of how they age.
 
Posts
804
Likes
896
Good thread. Do people believe 1861s (Luminova) keeping relatively the same value for the near/medium term future?
 
Posts
372
Likes
1,222
Well apparently Rolex output will be restricted while they tool up for new movements? And certainly new stainless sports models sitting in uk ad’s is rare at the moment (brexit etc..) so surely omega sports models especially LE’s should benefit ........