pascs
路I'm sure you'll be very happy with it 馃憤
Yeah, wow - those caliber 2500's are gonna be great.
...... right up til the point they stop for no apparent reason, and now that they're out of warranty it'll cost an arm & a leg to fix with no guarantee they won't quit again. 馃檮
Excerpt from a June 2011 thread on the caliber 2500:
http://www.watchtalkforums.info/forums/omega-forum/51402.htm#post464788
My point is there shouldn't be any fix necessary. Not from a major brand like Omega. The 2500 should have been a research & development caliber. It should not have hit the market at all in it's A, B, or C form because it was obvious the bugs had not been worked out. Omega ran with a marketing advantage instead of made sure their expensive watches worked properly.
And an FYI: I've heard quite a few stories of the public having issues from AD's (not on company time though) including one about a woman's $30,000 diamond encrusted caliber 2500 that was DOA.
Al, I have the .pdf file on the updates / repairs to the 330x calibers.
I'm in the mattress industry and there are "life tests" for beds too. If that product can have sufficient R & D to know that their failure rates are extremely low, why couldn't a watch company? Granted, the cheap beds don't go through this kind of testing, but to continue the analogy Omega doesn't make cheap watches. I understand that there will be warranty issues once in a while, but from what I've seen on watch forums the caliber 2500 A, B, and C had the highest number of complaints by far of any $2000+ watch.