Verifying a '68 "Ultraman" without the Extract of the Archives?

Posts
17
Likes
16
The Ultraman resource page sent to you by @gatorcpa discusses the shiny dial issue and it sounds like the author (@Spacefruit ) does not think it is necessary criteria, at least that’s how I read it.
I read that resource page too. To my eyes the dials there look very much like mine, so I can’t really judge the ‘shiny’ aspect, but it’s good to see the author doesn’t treat it as a strict requirement.
 
Posts
23,131
Likes
51,637
The shiny dial is obvious when you handle the watch and view it at various angles with respect to the lighting. It has a more glossy appearance than a typical dial. I have only handled one of the glossy dials in person, but it was clearly different than a typical pre-moon dial. I think that the shiny dials were specific to the Ultraman release, but there are certainly legit Ultraman examples that don't have the shiny dial.
 
Posts
17
Likes
16
The shiny dial is obvious when you handle the watch and view it at various angles with respect to the lighting. It has a more glossy appearance than a typical dial. I have only handled one of the glossy dials in person, but it was clearly different than a typical pre-moon dial. I think that the shiny dials were specific to the Ultraman release, but there are certainly legit Ultraman examples that don't have the shiny dial.
I honestly don’t know what a ‘typical dial’ looks like in this context. Without a side-by-side photo, it’s hard for me to understand the difference. If you have a clear photo of an Ultraman with the shiny dial you are talking about, that would be very helpful for comparison.
 
Posts
23,131
Likes
51,637
If it's important to you, I'd suggest trying to connect with an expert in-person. Many photos have been posted of the shiny dials and typical dials, you can find them with a bit of effort. However, while you can see differences in photos, the differences are more apparent in the hand. It's not trivial to capture gloss and texture in photos.
 
Posts
17
Likes
16
If it's important to you, I'd suggest trying to connect with an expert in-person. Many photos have been posted of the shiny dials and typical dials, you can find them with a bit of effort. However, while you can see differences in photos, the differences are more apparent in the hand. It's not trivial to capture gloss and texture in photos.
The watch was serviced by an Omega-certified watchmaker here in Finland with experience on Ultraman examples, so it has already been in expert hands. I’ve never seen any other Omega in person besides my own, so I don’t really have a reference point for dial gloss. Photos are all I can realistically share here, but I appreciate the insights.
 
Posts
730
Likes
2,187
You could search this forum too. The down arrow besides "Forum" gets you to the advanced search. It is quite good.

However, just to put it out there, buying original examples of watches is a different specialty than servicing them. Several of what I consider to be experts have weighed in on this thread. Nobody is going to definitively tell you unless they can clearly see everything they are looking for. Internet pictures just aren't the same.

It is a great looking watch, and since you have a real connection to it, the main value is there. Hope you get to enjoy it in good health!
 
Posts
17
Likes
16
My advice: forget about it and enjoy the watch. It's a 10/10 and I'm jealous 😅
Thanks - you’re probably right… 😅
 
Posts
1,381
Likes
2,805
I honestly don’t know what a ‘typical dial’ looks like in this context. Without a side-by-side photo, it’s hard for me to understand the difference. If you have a clear photo of an Ultraman with the shiny dial you are talking about, that would be very helpful for comparison.
Here is another thread on this subject


and this thread has a comparison picture

 
Posts
17
Likes
16
Here is another thread on this subject


and this thread has a comparison picture


Thanks for the links! Now that I see the examples, it looks like my watch does have a glossy dial after all - at least to my eyes.
 
Posts
1,381
Likes
2,805
it looks like my watch does have a glossy dial after all - at least to my eyes.
Great ! The shine may turn up better in pictures if you hold the watch in direct(sun) light and move it around a bit to photograph it at the best angle.
I had the same experience with a Tropical dial Speedmaster which only showed itself under certain light. Just experiment a bit.
 
Posts
17
Likes
16
Great ! The shine may turn up better in pictures if you hold the watch in direct(sun) light and move it around a bit to photograph it at the best angle.
I had the same experience with a Tropical dial Speedmaster which only showed itself under certain light. Just experiment a bit.
Yes, good point. I’ll have to try different lighting and take some more photos. But to me it already looks clearly glossy when compared to the matte dial examples.
 
Posts
920
Likes
3,832
Thank you - the dial looks more matte than shiny, just like in the photos.
Please know I don’t meant to be argumentative in this reply or arrogantly disagree with other well experienced members but I would like to share an alternative view of dial finish.
From this last photo I’d wager that this dial either might still be glossy in the right light or was quite glossy at one time and has patinated a bit over time. Could also be a semi-gloss dial as there have confirmed examples of those as well. In no way saying I’m an expert, but I’ve drooled over many ultraman and standard speedmaster references over the years, and I’m not completely sold that this is a run of the mill matte dial. It could just be the lighting and sure I could be completely mistaken having not seen the watch in person, so take my opinion with a grain of salt, but I wouldn’t rule out a glossy dial. You’d need to post some photos in direct sunlight, or a video if possible, for others here to comment.

Here’s an example from the Davidoff Brothers of a semi-gloss dial.

Edit was to fix my spelling of patinated. Dang autocorrect.
Edited:
 
Posts
17
Likes
16
From this last photo I’d wager that this dial either might still be glossy in the right light or was quite glossy at one time and has patinated a bit over time. Could also be a semi-gloss dial as there have confirmed examples of those as well. In no way saying I’m an expert, but I’ve drooled over many ultraman and standard speedmaster references over the years, and I’m not completely sold that this is a run of the mill matte dial. It could just be the lighting and sure I could be completely mistaken having not seen the watch in person, so take my opinion with a grain of salt, but I wouldn’t rule out a glossy dial. You’d need to post some photos in direct sunlight, or a video if possible, for others here to comment.

Here’s an example from the Davidoff Brothers of a semi-gloss dial.

Edit was to fix my spelling of patinated. Dang autocorrect.

Thanks for sharing your perspective. I’ll try to take some sunlight photos at some point, but for now I can only say that in person it looks closer to the glossy examples than the matte ones.
 
Posts
6,700
Likes
12,318
Screenshot of the speedmaster101 ultraman-resource-page
🙄
Surely the number of only 50 Speedmaster Ultraman produced must have been updated over the years?
AFAIK almost half-a-dozen are seen in the 1969 movie " Marooned - The Saga of Ironman One "
 
Posts
17
Likes
16
Surely the number of only 50 Speedmaster Ultraman produced must have been updated over the years?
AFAIK almost half-a-dozen are seen in the 1969 movie " Marooned - The Saga of Ironman One "
Looking at the still picture, the watch doesn’t actually seem to be a genuine Speedmaster. The dial printing and logo are clearly different. Of course, I might be wrong..

 
Posts
17
Likes
16
Looking at the still picture, the watch doesn’t actually seem to be a genuine Speedmaster. The dial printing and logo are clearly different. Of course, I might be wrong..

Looking at the still again, I think I may have been mistaken. The shadow of the orange hand seems to obscure the text, and the Omega logo might just be too faint to show up clearly in this frame. So it could well be a genuine Speedmaster after all..
 
Posts
6,700
Likes
12,318
Indeed, the 145.012 version had a large applied logo above that text, so the six watches seen in the movie must be correct Ultraman versions
Always wondered why the Ultraman was chosen:
1. It simply was available at the time of filming (1968)
2. If fitted color-wise very nicely with the red helmet and the accents on the astronauts' space suit.
.
(Photo: Colombia Pictures Corp.)
 
Posts
6,700
Likes
12,318
Interesting to know that already half-a-dozen (of allegedly only 50 produced) Speedmaster 145.012-67 Ultraman show up in this movie. Especially in a time when product placement wasn't a thing yet... compared to "The Right Stuff" (1983), "Apollo 13" (1995), "First man" (2018), "Moonfall" (2022) and "Ultraman Omega" (2025).
It would be interesting to know how many Speedmaster Ultraman were used during the making of the late 1960s Japanese Ultra Series "Ultraman" Tsuburaya productions! It has been almost 60 years after all...
https://www.fratellowatches.com/speedmaster-ultraman/#gref