incabloc
·...if you ever have the chance to see the Omega archive, then you will know that its far away from a consumer con.
This certainly looks good with some distance @Horologyhusky, a close-up allows to see a too short chrono hand 😀
While we have a number of experts in the room I'd like to see if anyone can shed any light on my 145.012-67's chrono hand. It would appear to be the correct length but is obviously not factory correct being a late October 1968 production. Watch was purchased from son of original owner who said it wasn't service and by the goopy gasket I'm inclined to believe him. In addition the other hands appear to match the lume of the rest of the dial perfectly, leading one to question why if serviced would only the Chrono hand have been replaced? Some time ago a fellow OF'er mentioned that it could be a faded orange hand? Does anyone have any leads to help clarify?
It cannot leave its cousin...
My updated Ultraman project, using an "Ultraman-spec" hand. 😉 don't ask me where I got it.
don't ask me where I got it.