Diabolik
·@Bill Sohne OK, full disclosure, there was bourbon involved in the deception declaration. You are correct "deception" is too strong. Intentionally omitted? You know they can see the issue. They intentionally did not address it because it is obvious? The rub is that it is obvious to an educated buyer. Not sure if they think the bracelet ads value. No value would end this whole rant that I apparently have started. Think if correct, it would be a $1K adder? $1.5K? Hodinkee should address this in their listing or put it on a leather strap and sell the bracelet separate.
![]()
I personally think that if they can address minor cracks in the minute hand lume (which I couldn't see), differences in lume patina from hands to the dial, and damage (err patina) to the date wheel in their "Nitty Gritty" section, they could mention the crunch function from the end links to the bracelet.
I'm not a buyer for this piece, either. Beautiful watch, though.
To summarize:
1. Changed "deceptive" to "intentionally omitted".
2. Wrong end links.
3. Beautiful watch.
Enough said. Back to drinking.
There is also the issue of the serial number ... It does not look right at all ... and reference looks a bit weird as well !

