Davidt
·Funnily enough he doesn’t seem to have any issues sending his own Rolex’s worth thousands when he has some of his own money on the line.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
I don’t like seeing anyone ripped off, but the watches that haven’t been returned are also my primary focus.
When it comes to arguing over details of a watch being a late 2018 or early 2019 model, or if there was some sort of arbitrage type play involved in the timing of payments, etc, my eyes glaze over a bit. Still it appears that money is owed to Nico, no matter what details about these other things are in dispute.
I have honestly tried to keep up with the Nico portion of the story, but I'm having a hard time. Can you break down what the simple issue appears to be?
Feel bad for Nico but I'm heartbroken for the OP, still can't wrap my head around how a simple situation has become so complicated.
Oisin was sent money for watches that were never fully delivered. Not all the money has been returned. From the evidence provided, it appears that 11,000 Euros are outstanding at this stage.
Oisin was sent money for watches that were never fully delivered. Not all the money has been returned. From the evidence provided, it appears that 11,000 Euros are outstanding at this stage.
I don’t really subscribe to any of these pseudo celebrity YouTube channels, so this character is new to me, but having watched the livestream, and reading some of his replies on his other videos, he comes across as a subversive, and very unpleasant individual.
The way he describes the OP, who is recovering from a stroke, as unhinged, unstable, and paranoid is shocking - certainly not the behavior one would expect from a self-respecting, conscionable person.
Best wishes to the OP, and all other affected parties, and hope you receive a favourable resolution.
But Oisin uses his 'special guy' to make the shipping work, you can't expect him to use the hoi polloi at the local post office.
So what is the gist of Oisin's rebuttal, or defense? "Never intended to hold the money" and "misunderstanding"? He seemed to imply that he had some serious dirt on Nico, but doesn't seem so?
But Oisin uses his 'special guy' to make the shipping work, you can't expect him to use the hoi polloi at the local post office.
The customs thing is more of a threat from him. He’s saying he’ll return them, but the owners will need to pay customs duties that may have been avoided in the past with his help.
Funny thing that: did he have to pay 800 euro (or anything at all) to receive the Bogey watch in the first place? No.
It’s been stated a dozen times but worth repeating: the entire narrative about avoiding cost to return the watch is imaginary, as there are no duties owed to mail a watch that is not being purchased/sold.
Nevermind that, as we’ve solved for it: OP is free to contact Oisin and offer that the law firm of Sherman & Sterling will send a bonded courier with receipt of pick-up to a location of Oisin’s maximum convenience, and thereafter be held in escrow by Shearman & Sterling until OP can arrange for its retrieval.
In a matter of a few hours of agreeing to this cost-free, risk-free, effort-free means of returning the watch, Oisin can be prove up exactly how deep a misunderstanding this all is.
OP, the choice is yours as to whether and if you would like to attempt this offered solution.
Happy to also have the Seiko’s collected.