Post your Longineseses'

Posts
1,960
Likes
24,728
Ref. 22497 Cal. 12.68N (Spacer removed for the pics...)
DSCF8144%20copy_zps1mywqf1u.jpg DSCF8143%20copy_zps4mjglepx.jpg DSCF8145%20copy_zps4tpdodcd.jpg 12.68%20n%202_zpscfwgj3ew.jpg 12.68%20n%203_zpsgyo2ookq.jpg
DSCF8146%20copy_zpssejqjjrb.jpg
rgds - h.u.
 
Posts
2,057
Likes
14,515
Just posted in WRU but deserves another post 馃榿

13ZN mono pusher from 1938 enamel dial ( one tiny crack 馃槻

 
Posts
2,770
Likes
4,816
I believe that this dial is from an earlier 13.33 as it is nearly identical to this example from 1913: http://www.orologiko.it/forum/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=4526 and this example (also from 1913), which Longines based their commemorative Column-Wheel Single Push-Piece Chronograph 180th Anniversary model on: http://www.watchtime.com/featured/longines-180th-anniversary-collection/2/

A 13ZN with an enamel dial, incorrect subdial (and minute/hour?) hands, polished lugs/case, is suspicious. I do not intend to come across as contentious, I am simply intrigued.

It would be interesting to hear from @minutenrohr though he has already spoken about this topic in a past thread: https://omegaforums.net/threads/auctionata-13zn-enamel.20222/

Here is my lone enamel dial Longines
 
Posts
1,960
Likes
24,728
...as mentioned by Dirty Dozen: strange hands, a dubious dial (at least the Longines signature should show the modern style, not cursive. Even some 13.33 had the modern...) - not a really correct watch IMO.

rgds - h.u.
 
Posts
7,276
Likes
76,357
Wow. You two know how to collect 'em. I might have to get mine out for a 'grupo'...

I have to be a man of my word, so here's my collection, minus the '68 Ultra-Chron that has been in the shop now for a lo-o-o-o-o-o-o-ng time...馃檨, but I'll throw in my last best pic of that one, too:


Here's the 50's crowd together (those on the left above):

'50 cal.22A, '50 22AS, '53 23Z, '59 19A 'spider' 馃槣




The early '60's grupo, starting with the 18k RG 'Grandaddy' Date@12 Flagship 馃グ:

'61 cal.341, '61 350, '63 280, '63 30L, '?? 12.68Z



mid-60's whipper-snappers:

'66 cal.342, '66 D@6 343, '66 Pulsations 342 (can you say, 'rare'?), '67 345 Flagship 馃榿馃榿



Here's my '68 Ultra-Chron cal. 431, currently in extended rehab...



...and just because I know I'm not the only one here that loves a pretty 'back-side' or two 馃槈:



My Longines collection has at least one glaring omission, which I hope one day to rectify, and it's been a grail of mine for quite some time, now... and it is very aptly named; or, at least it will be once I get one!

PS: I feel I must give big credit and thanks to @ulackfocus , because without his help, my collection would not even be worth bearing mention 馃憤...
Edited:
 
Posts
386
Likes
1,480
I have to be a man of my word, so here's my collection, minus the '68 Ultra-Chron that has been in the shop now for a lo-o-o-o-o-o-o-ng time...馃檨, but I'll throw in my last best pic of that one, too:


Here's the 50's crowd together (those on the left above):

'50 cal.22A, '50 22AS, '53 23Z, '59 19A 'spider' 馃槣




The early '60's grupo, starting with the 18k RG 'Grandaddy' Date@12 Flagship 馃グ:

'61 cal.341, '61 350, '63 280, '63 30L, '?? 12.68Z



mid-60's whipper-snappers:

'66 cal.342, '66 D@6 343, '66 Pulsations 342 (can you say, 'rare'?), '67 345 Flagship 馃榿馃榿



Here's my '68 Ultra-Chron cal. 431, currently in extended rehab...



...and just because I know I'm not the only one here that loves a pretty 'back-side' or two 馃槈:



My Longines collection has at least one glaring omission, which I hope one day to rectify, and it's been a grail of mine for quite some time, now... and it is very aptly named; or, at least it will be once I get one!

PS: I feel I must give big credit and thanks to @ulackfocus , because without his help, my collection would not even be worth bearing mention 馃憤...

You bastard.........
 
Posts
352
Likes
1,832
My Longines collection has at least one glaring omission, which I hope one day to rectify, and it's been a grail of mine for quite some time, now... and it is very aptly named; or, at least it will be once I get one!

@dougiedude Beautiful collection! Good luck with your conquest on the glaring omission. I'm sure you will strike gold soon! 馃槣
 
Posts
7,690
Likes
26,653
Though the markers may have been re-lumed at some point, the hands look original to me. Nice watch!
 
Posts
1,960
Likes
24,728
Thank you - the lume of the hands seems to be (at night) a mixture of luminova and pigment, still glowing partly. But i麓d be glad if the shape of the hands is OK.

rgds - h.u.
 
Posts
2,770
Likes
4,816
@minutenrohr
Ref. 23044, Cal. 10L, 33mm, 6,923914, dubious hands, polished, old.
DSCF8147%20copy_zpsnvlfsv7q.jpg DSCF8150%20copy_zpsnhtg3dy5.jpg DSCF8148%20copy_zpsnquwtzlu.jpg werk_zpsqsxof2sc.jpg
I am curious about this dial. Firstly, the dial foot appears to be a silver color, not the usual copper color. Secondly, the "LONGINES" font looks larger/different than I would expect.

I have read that different companies (Stern, Fluckiger, Lemrich) produced dials for Longines but I am interested in your thoughts about this dial. I have found an earlier (REF. 22244) example with a similar dial to compare: http://orologi.forumfree.it/?t=64907858&st=15
Edited:
 
Posts
2,770
Likes
4,816
I think, the Longines-signature should be smaller.
Early redial?
Yes I think so as well. Since other aspects of your 23044 have also been altered (the polished case, re-lumed dial, syringe hands that glow) I believe that an early redial is likely.

I am also interested in your REF. 23197 since I have a REF. 23163 with a close serial number. The Longines signature looks slightly different than I would expect. Also, did "sei tacche" Longines with the caliber 12.68N/10.68N usually have an outer minute track with numerals? Here is my example.
Edited:
 
Posts
1,960
Likes
24,728
...nice exemplar, your 23163. The truth is: I don麓t know. The watches are old, I can麓t judge if someone created a redial maybe 40 years ago. Not easy to detect pics in google - for compairing a bit. Even some watches in Goldbergers book have dubious dials (by chance the examples with silvered feet...).
But there麓s one important difference between "dark" dials and "silver" dials (though I don麓t want to carry coals to Newcastle): The dark are printed "upside down" (italian: "elettrocolorato", german: "galvanisiert"), what means the dial was gilt or silvered first; after that the dark - grey or black - color was brought as a mask/negative on it by galvanisation. So the result is flat, not embossed and often another kind of type. I think the technique got lost; nobody I know in the german vintage scene claims to know how it was done - one of the better dial-restorers (Causemann) told me that he made much experiments, but had no satisfying results.
Finally I麓d like your dial much more than mine (regarding the 23197/23163) but I麓m not sure if mine is a redial, because it麓s another print-style (black lacquer on silvered ground vs. upside-down print on silvered ground) and perhaps another manufacturer. I麓m not lucky with my dial and a closed outer minute track would be nicer.

rgds - h.u.
 
Posts
2,770
Likes
4,816
I appreciate your honesty and I agree that it is very difficult to be certain about a dials originality (regardless of dial feet). I did not know that dark dials were produced using such a method and the terminology is very interesting to me. I am truly grateful that you have taken the time to explain such a process and to share your vast knowledge of Longines from this era. I look forward to seeing more of your collection.
 
Posts
531
Likes
2,098
'59 19A 'spider'

I love that spider. There's something very clean but not clinical/sterile in the way Longines does a crosshair...