Omega Holy Grail ref. 3760822 hands set

Posts
461
Likes
353
He’s not quite got it right with respect the end links for example ...the original Chuck Maddox listing at the earliest stage called the 808 links the right ones and the replacements the 809
And certainly the MWO book places the B2 bezel well before the B4
 
Posts
461
Likes
353
Another owners opinion. Owned the bottom watch with discolored hands
in my last post.
From the "Show me your 376.0822" thread
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f20/sh...peedmaster-38953-post4585159.html#post4585159

.
MarkEg
user-offline.png Member
Join Date
Feb 2006
Posts
508

Re: Show me your 376.0822 Speedmaster!
The Omega Speedmaster Lemania 1045 (5100) Grail has been always been a tough watch to find. They just don’t come up for sale very often..
You don’t have to worry about the fakers as they seem to have left this one alone so far. Estimates are that only 1000 were made and the case design is quite different to the normal Speedmaster, thicker and with the pushers enclosed.
I am on my second watch now and having recently sold the first one I bought.

The main culprits for less than perfect versions seems to be Omega themselves.

Examples that have been through Bienne, come back with alternative dial, hands, and bezel. Some of these changes are easy to spot other are not, so I thought I would list a few things I have noticed in my hunt for the Grail in case others may be looking for one.
Here are the differences

The Bienne – replacement dial
Does not have the number 10,
The minute markers are a smaller diameter and so leave a gap near the chapter ring markers.
The luminous hour markers do not extent out as far as the chapter ring.
The day and date window is not enclosed – and is open to the right of the date.
The 24 hour dial has a shaded area from 6 to 18
The word OMEGA has a different font - and
The S in Speedmaster is very different.

The Bienne replacement hands
The hour hand is fatter
Both hands are not so sharp/pointed at the ends
On both hands the lume does not extend for the full length on the hand
The chronograph second hand does not have a Diamond lume section.

The replacement Bezel
It has an accent over the E, not present on the original
The 70 marker has a low dot, whereas the original has a dot to the right of the 70


Bracelet and end pieces

The original bracelet is the famous 1450 and ends are numbered 809
whereas the newer replacements ends are numbered 808
I have seen some Grails with different replacement bracelets, including the standard 1171 speedy bracelet.

So all in all quite a few differences – I appreciate that parts are no longer available, however you would have thought that Omega could try harder to make replacements that keep the look of the watch the same.
Good luck finding one of these, if you do in my opinion it is well worth the search.
To anyone who has a Bienne refurbished watch – my advice is to keep the old parts safe..

Cheers

Mark

The Bienne Re-furb
Grail-Front.jpg


My recent watch - the Chrono second counter has a broken end, but apart from that it is all original.
M11_0070.jpg
M11_9995.jpg
M11_0075.jpg

The one I sold recently
DSC_1013.jpg

And before the day wheel was changed
 
Posts
282
Likes
93
Are these hands correct for Ref. 3760822 Holy Grail too?

Thank you?
 
Posts
461
Likes
353
Are these hands correct for Ref. 3760822 Holy Grail too?

Thank you?
Yes they fit the grail as the Teutonic and the grail were both 1045 but lume length needs to be checked as I have seen variations
 
Posts
282
Likes
93
Yes they fit the grail as the Teutonic and the grail were both 1045 but lume length needs to be checked as I have seen variations

I refer to lume length exactly. Are these hands correct for Ref. 3760822 Holy Grail (not for any cal. 1045)?
Thank you for your help.
 
Posts
461
Likes
353
Yes they will fit the Grail and as far as I can tell they are exactly the same as the grail hands if these are the specific hands you are referring to
You can use them to replace grail service hands to put the grail back to authentic
Best wishes
 
Posts
282
Likes
93
Yes, I try to buy a correct Mk5 because I can not find the original hands for my Holy Grail...
 
Posts
3,084
Likes
3,574
Yes, I try to buy a correct Mk5 because I can not find the original hands for my Holy Grail...
I admire your tenacity 👍
 
Posts
282
Likes
93
I admire your tenacity 👍

Someone had my same idea.
Bye bye and tank you...
 
Posts
282
Likes
93
Could I use the hands of this Mark V exactly to replace the hands of my Holy Grail?

Are these hands correct for Ref. 3760822 Holy Grail too?

Thank you for your help?
 
Posts
9,217
Likes
24,051
Yes, but the chrono seconds hand appears to be missing the tail. Hour and minute are correct though.
 
Posts
282
Likes
93
Yes, but the chrono seconds hand appears to be missing the tail. Hour and minute are correct though.

Are also the other hands of subdials correct? Also 24h hand?
Why do you think that the seconds hand missed the tail?
How it should be?

Thanks a lot
 
Posts
9,217
Likes
24,051
Other hands look fine to me.. And it appears I was mistaken about the chrono hand. Here's a reference.

 
Posts
567
Likes
1,811
The hands from the MKV are exactly the same like the ones from the grail.
 
Posts
282
Likes
93
Other hands look fine to me.. And it appears I was mistaken about the chrono hand. Here's a reference.

So I can swap all the hands from my new Mark V and raplace the wrong hands of my Holy Grail?
 
Posts
461
Likes
353
Unfortunately this is not the right Dial in the above photo
 
Posts
461
Likes
353
Unfortunately this is not the right Dial in the above photo
Look at the gap between the minute track and the Dial
And look at the missing number 10 on the minutes this indicates that this is from a mark 4 or similar