Omega Holy Grail ref. 3760822 hands set

Posts
9,217
Likes
24,051
@pitpro, you mention 3 bezels.. are these not the same as the standard moonwatch ones?
 
Posts
461
Likes
353
You have a fabulous Italian bimetallic [more correctly bicolour I was told]

the production date is not the delivery date as that batch from the production run of 23 February 1988 was sent to Italian distributors on December 1989 for retail sale in 1990

Your movement batch for the Italian grail was I think 4823 1360 ...containing your model 1364 .....to 48231369

the prior batch 4823 1350....1359 was for the conventional grail

but I also fine it interesting that the watch is referenced as a DA 376.0822

I had been assured that that model was always stamped st 376.0822 even though it was bimetallic

Can I ask you what number limited to 200 is printed on the side and what is the model number on the case back

Thanks for showing the watch and thanks in anticipation of an answer
 
Posts
567
Likes
1,811
Thank you, just the dial has some missing lume, but thats mor or less normal I think.
Mine is also stamped with ST376.0822, I think they just used the already available case backs. The number of my watch is 100.
 
Posts
461
Likes
353
Thank you, just the dial has some missing lume, but thats mor or less normal I think.
Mine is also stamped with ST376.0822, I think they just used the already available case backs. The number of my watch is 100.
The missing Lume at the 3 o’clock is totally typical
There are also issues The 35 minutes 25 minutes and five minute lume positions
I think Singer the dial manufactors over painted the lume at these points and they tended to fracture or fall off
 
Posts
3,084
Likes
3,574
@pitpro, you mention 3 bezels.. are these not the same as the standard moonwatch ones?
@oddboy
What I shared about 3 bezels was taken from a discussion on the watchuseek "Show me your 376.0822" thread.
Pascal, the thread starter, had a watch with an accented bezel, he said he knew
had no service ever done and was certain it left the factory that way.
Here's Pascal's watch and quote from the thread.
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f20/show-me-your-376-0822-speedmaster-38953-9.html
grailwrist1.jpg
"I'm not at all convinced the accented bezel can be necessarily defined as a replacement part. The reason is that I've seen several of these watches in their fully original configuration, including my own example, with that particular bezel. In the case of my watch, it never benefited from any cosmetic care, so the bezel is the one it left Bienne with.

My theory is that there has been two production batches for this part: an initial one (possibly of a thousand) without the accented character, and a second one with it. In the meantime, the watch turned out to be a bit of a flop on the market, so Omega got stuck with the remainder of the second production batch for future service needs. My personal guesstimate for the total number of these watches is that around 1,500 were made, and since the last 200 (the Italian market only version mith321 posted a picture of) got a specific solid gold bezel, that's another 200 bezel inserts freed up for future needs."


I replied pointing out that an NOS example presented on the thread by mith21 and another seemingly original watch owned by MarkEg and my watch all had a bezel with No accent and the 7 had no downleg. When he sold it, mith21 offered it as NOS with paperwork, and it sure looked it. Here it is.'

Here is the MarkEg watch that looks very original.

attachment.php

Then there is the most commonly seen bezel like this one. No accent and 7 with a downleg.
sparebezelchapterring.JPG

This is what was called a Service bezel by an owner in the thread that sent his in to Omega for service
and it came back with this and the old one.

3760822wrist.jpg

The bicolor seems to have no downleg 7 also
My take on the whole thing is that if the dot is next to the 70, it's original,
if below the 70, replacement
It's just my theory, doesn't mean anything but it's pretty hard to argue with NOS.
 
Posts
9,217
Likes
24,051
I almost bought that watch from mith21!!!

Thanks for the extra verbosity. Very helpful.

I always assumed it was just the same old moonwatch bezel and you could fit any to this case, even a DON if you wanted to. Guess not.
 
Posts
461
Likes
353
I almost bought that watch from mith21!!!

Thanks for the extra verbosity. Very helpful.

I always assumed it was just the same old moonwatch bezel and you could fit any to this case, even a DON if you wanted to. Guess not.[/QUOTE
@oddboy
What I shared about 3 bezels was taken from a discussion on the watchuseek "Show me your 376.0822" thread.
Pascal, the thread starter, had a watch with an accented bezel, he said he knew
had no service ever done and was certain it left the factory that way.
Here's Pascal's watch and quote from the thread.
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f20/show-me-your-376-0822-speedmaster-38953-9.html
grailwrist1.jpg
"I'm not at all convinced the accented bezel can be necessarily defined as a replacement part. The reason is that I've seen several of these watches in their fully original configuration, including my own example, with that particular bezel. In the case of my watch, it never benefited from any cosmetic care, so the bezel is the one it left Bienne with.

My theory is that there has been two production batches for this part: an initial one (possibly of a thousand) without the accented character, and a second one with it. In the meantime, the watch turned out to be a bit of a flop on the market, so Omega got stuck with the remainder of the second production batch for future service needs. My personal guesstimate for the total number of these watches is that around 1,500 were made, and since the last 200 (the Italian market only version mith321 posted a picture of) got a specific solid gold bezel, that's another 200 bezel inserts freed up for future needs."


I replied pointing out that an NOS example presented on the thread by mith21 and another seemingly original watch owned by MarkEg and my watch all had a bezel with No accent and the 7 had no downleg. When he sold it, mith21 offered it as NOS with paperwork, and it sure looked it. Here it is.'

Here is the MarkEg watch that looks very original.

attachment.php

Then there is the most commonly seen bezel like this one. No accent and 7 with a downleg.
sparebezelchapterring.JPG

This is what was called a Service bezel by an owner in the thread that sent his in to Omega for service
and it came back with this and the old one.

3760822wrist.jpg

The bicolor seems to have no downleg 7 also
My take on the whole thing is that if the dot is next to the 70, it's original,
if below the 70, replacement
It's just my theory, doesn't mean anything but it's pretty hard to argue with NOS.
 
Posts
3,084
Likes
3,574
I almost bought that watch from mith21!!!

Thanks for the extra verbosity. Very helpful.

I always assumed it was just the same old moonwatch bezel and you could fit any to this case, even a DON if you wanted to. Guess not.
I almost did too. LoL
Thought very hard about it.
We should have!
 
Posts
461
Likes
353
Unfortunately with respect you’re focusing on the wrong thing it’s not the position of the dot that is important
It’s the number seven

If the seven has a serif and has no accent it’s a type B2 and it is original if it doesn’t have a seriph it is a replacement type B4

Type B4 bezels were not made till 1990
Type B2 bezels were on the grails and their contemporaries the speedy moon the 20 year etc

For a good example of an original watch you can do no better then look at Chuck Maddox ‘s With the Type B2 bezel Unfortunately his watch sports the 808end links
Which in my humble opinion is incorrect as the watch should be provided with a 1450 bracelet and 809 and links or at worse the 1479 and 812,s
 
Posts
9,217
Likes
24,051
So the bezel is one and the same as the moonwatch ?
 
Posts
461
Likes
353
One further point a serif 7 with an accent which is not a DON was only produced in 1995 and is a type 5 or 6
Way after the watch finished it’s last run
 
Posts
461
Likes
353
So the bezel is one and the same as the moonwatch ?
Yes exactly the same
 
Posts
9,217
Likes
24,051
I almost did too. LoL
Thought very hard about it.
We should have!
I bought a really nice ranchero off of him instead...

 
Posts
3,084
Likes
3,574
Unfortunately with respect you’re focusing on the wrong thing it’s not the position of the dot that is important
It’s the number seven

If the seven has a serif and has no accent it’s a type B2 and it is original if it doesn’t have a seriph it is a replacement type B4

Type B4 bezels were not made till 1990
Type B2 bezels were on the grails and their contemporaries the speedy moon the 20 year etc

For a good example of an original watch you can do no better then look at Chuck Maddox ‘s With the Type B2 bezel Unfortunately his watch sports the 808end links
Which in my humble opinion is incorrect as the watch should be provided with a 1450 bracelet and 809 and links or at worse the 1479 and 812,s
So you're saying that these two watches(with no serif), one claimed NOS, with no other
visible alterations(dials or hands) do not have the original bezel? So someone
changed just the bezel on these watches, nothing else?
I'm sorry but that doesn't add up or make sense.
You stated Omega doesn't even know what's correct as they own 2 incorrect
ones in their museum.
So then we come down to this being your theory based on your research.
How do you explain an NOS watch with no serif? And another beautiful example with
discolored hands(bottom pic) that weren't replaced, but only the bezel supposedly was?
To me it's a good bet Neither of these watches ever "needed" a bezel,
And why would a limited production watch need 2 different batches of Service bezels?
One with an accent and one without. One with Dot under 7, one dot under 7.
And we know for sure that the last 200 bicolor used Non serif 7 bezel. So it's not like you can say
Omega didn't use non serif in that time period. They did.


456472-fe9034d8171f7cd37de525802792c340.jpg
456470-d524d6849e5dc5d6ae9b249080fb2779.jpg
attachment.php
 
Posts
3,084
Likes
3,574
Here's the listing for when mith321 sold the watch
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f29/fs-omega-speedmaster-grail-st-376-0822-a-914347.html
Omega speedmaster grail ST 376.0822
about 4 years ago

attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
Details
Price
$9,000.00
Brand
Omega
Seller
mith321
Available on
WatchUSeek
Location
Germany
Description

Omega speedmaster grail for sale ST 376.0822? Its unsold stock from the late 1980s ? with box/papers etc.
The papers are printed in 1986 (stamped at the back) with Dealers stamp on it (dealer in Germany)
I have not worn this watch ? its practically brand new condition ? Its on the famous 1450 bracelet with 809 endlinks ?
The date wheel is in German I did not change it as I wanted keep it all original .
It never had a service due to it rarity and I would recommend the buyer to factor in a service if buying to wear it on a daily basis ?
its keeping good time
?
Offers over $9000
will consider Trades
?
This really is a fantastic watch ? I have owned may speedies - this is the only one that give me Goosebumps ? Its slightly thicker than a speedy professional ? full of character. Its a work of art -
Attached Images
Edited:
 
Posts
3,084
Likes
3,574
Another owners opinion. Owned the bottom watch with discolored hands
in my last post.
From the "Show me your 376.0822" thread
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f20/sh...peedmaster-38953-post4585159.html#post4585159

.
MarkEg
user-offline.png Member
Join Date
Feb 2006
Posts
508

Re: Show me your 376.0822 Speedmaster!
The Omega Speedmaster Lemania 1045 (5100) Grail has been always been a tough watch to find. They just don’t come up for sale very often..
You don’t have to worry about the fakers as they seem to have left this one alone so far. Estimates are that only 1000 were made and the case design is quite different to the normal Speedmaster, thicker and with the pushers enclosed.
I am on my second watch now and having recently sold the first one I bought.

The main culprits for less than perfect versions seems to be Omega themselves.

Examples that have been through Bienne, come back with alternative dial, hands, and bezel. Some of these changes are easy to spot other are not, so I thought I would list a few things I have noticed in my hunt for the Grail in case others may be looking for one.
Here are the differences

The Bienne – replacement dial
Does not have the number 10,
The minute markers are a smaller diameter and so leave a gap near the chapter ring markers.
The luminous hour markers do not extent out as far as the chapter ring.
The day and date window is not enclosed – and is open to the right of the date.
The 24 hour dial has a shaded area from 6 to 18
The word OMEGA has a different font - and
The S in Speedmaster is very different.

The Bienne replacement hands
The hour hand is fatter
Both hands are not so sharp/pointed at the ends
On both hands the lume does not extend for the full length on the hand
The chronograph second hand does not have a Diamond lume section.

The replacement Bezel
It has an accent over the E, not present on the original
The 70 marker has a low dot, whereas the original has a dot to the right of the 70


Bracelet and end pieces

The original bracelet is the famous 1450 and ends are numbered 809
whereas the newer replacements ends are numbered 808
I have seen some Grails with different replacement bracelets, including the standard 1171 speedy bracelet.

So all in all quite a few differences – I appreciate that parts are no longer available, however you would have thought that Omega could try harder to make replacements that keep the look of the watch the same.
Good luck finding one of these, if you do in my opinion it is well worth the search.
To anyone who has a Bienne refurbished watch – my advice is to keep the old parts safe..

Cheers

Mark

The Bienne Re-furb
Grail-Front.jpg


My recent watch - the Chrono second counter has a broken end, but apart from that it is all original.
M11_0070.jpg
M11_9995.jpg
M11_0075.jpg

The one I sold recently
DSC_1013.jpg

And before the day wheel was changed