larryganz
·I have to disagree, and as evidence I submit a better lit photo (disclaimer: not mine) as yours obscures a good amount due to the dark background. And I won't even compare a ringer like the ghost bezel tritium dial piece in your pic, but just a lowly last-gen Sub.
![]()
As @Archer said, the transition from lugs to bracelet on the 116610 is insanely awkward. Also, the "maxi dial" looks overstuffed with the large markers along with the cyclops date, the ceramic bezel is too thick for the case width and finally the crown guards looks like the roided-up neck of a Muscle Beach goon who skipped leg day.
But that's just my observations and opinions, which are rarely deemed of any consequence. If you love your new Sub wear it with pride.
This is why I went for a Black Bay Red instead of a SubC no-date. Personally, I love the ceramic bezel, but I love the old sub's propertions better. With my GMT II BLNR, the PCL seem to break up the look of the fatter lugs and make them not stand out as much, but the proportions of my GMT II Coke bezel'd watch are still better.