MRC
·Best search results by looking for "dog point screw".
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Archer,
Thank you for that additional information.
So - what is a "Dog Screw Style"?
I guess I can sort of tell - by looking at my case screws, but I have never heard that term - so wondering what would make a screw "Dog Style".
Is it the bevel around the circumference of the head?
Kind Regards,
-Paul
This is what it refers to in a watchmaking context...
The potential drawback to this design is that it can cut into the case as you tighten it, so full head screws are generally preferred.
This is what it refers to in a watchmaking context...
The potential drawback to this design is that it can cut into the case as you tighten it, so full head screws are generally preferred.
Hmmm, not related to the "dogs" I'm familiar with in race car gearboxes. Given that it has to turn what is the advantage over a full head? Can't be much weight saving in something so small.
Gotcha - thank you for the illustration!
Hum - I must have a bad # (2704) then. As that is not the type/style screw that I have. Mine are full head (as can be seen in the pics of the movement before it was uncased).
-Paul
.................... I'd like to remove the broken half and replace the broken screw.
I have ordered the Bergeon 30209 tool to extract the broken half ...........................
Why didn't you go the cheap way and use an alum solution to dissolve the broken screw?
https://omegaforums.net/threads/removing-a-broken-stem-from-a-speedmaster-crown.61416/#post-766008
Thanks to @Archer I've used this method a couple of times with great success.
I don’t like these “dog” screws. On occasion, you find that the screw cannot be fully tightened, or otherwise over-tightened to permit the screw head to engage with the edge of the case. When that happens, it is necessary to swap the position of the case screws in hopes that solves the problem.
At what point did you remove the shock resist jewels for cleaning and rinsing?
Just oiled the end-stones.
Perhaps this is a little late - but I assume that 9010 is okay for these end-stones?
-Paul
Well Jim - I guess it's because I was looking for a tool - and the 30209 seemed to be it. 😀
Having said that, I may indeed use that method if the piece to be extracted is stuck too tight for the 30209.
I was very happy to learn of all the alternate methods and ideas that members posted.
I should have the 30209 this afternoon - so will know today if it's going to do the job.
Possible alternate mainspring?
All, still waiting for Cousins to be resupplied with the correct mainspring (1.5 x 0.135 x 340 x 11) [ thank you @JimInOz ]. Which they now show stock coming December 4th.
I did find something very close to this specification at Otto Frei. Their part # MS-69P (1.5 x 0.13 x 343).
Any thoughts on using a 0.130 thick spring in place of a 0.135? Is a slightly thinner (and very slightly longer) spring a possible substitute? Or is the 0.005 mm difference in thickness too much in the world of mainsprings?
The fact that they make and measure them down to 0.005 mm would indicate that it is significant and should not be substituted - but still thought I'd ask.
-Paul
Mainspring strength varies as a cube of it's thickness, so even small differences can make a big impact...
@Archer - I'll take that to mean - shouldn't substitute. 😀 (yes/no?)
But good to have that additional information about the strength and how it varies in relation to thickness.
I must say, that is quite surprising given the range of spring thickness that I see listed. I wouldn't expect movements to accept (require) that wide range of power.
Thank you sir!