Inpw
·Thankfully this nonsense story is all over the internet. Con man or just delusional, it's highly unlikely anybody will actually fall for it.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
I am ashamed to admit I watched that entire video, and it is very likely I know less than ever as a result. It was completely without value and provided zero information. I am beginning to see why many here are not able to simply ignore Steve, but they are ANGRY. I'm perturbted that he caused me to waste those few minutes watching that video. From here on, if I post in this thread, shame on me.
This NASA archive proves the inconsistency’s in the Batch numbers theory.
This NASA archive proves the inconsistency’s in the Batch numbers theory.
Oh look more proof you know nothing... You know that the reason for those few higher serial numbers is very very well documented as to why those are like that right? You apparently have no clue as to why they are.
but sure... if your so sure of this, doesn't that mean less proof that yours is the watch you claim it is? Since your claim is based on it being from the same batch? Please call your doctor, your meds need to be readjusted.
Hi @Steve Morley
I am really interested in your watch, as I have a similar Speedmaster myself.
Being from Sweden, English is not my first language, so maybe every little detail in this thread is not clear to me.
But can you please share pictures of your watch, we are 7 pages in without seeing a single picture of it, please share.
Best regards
Henrik
In an odd way, I admire your relentlessness. Can everyone else (and I mean everyone) be wrong and you right?
due to the sensitive nature of this matter. I have no intent to post photos.
No since NASA and Omega have the real SN of the watch and are not releasing it for obvious reasons. They have already confirmed his is not the watch.
Why won't they release the serial number? It could help them eventually locate it if it were public knowledge.