How often do you wear your vintage piece(s)?

Posts
3,589
Likes
8,192
Pre Ww2 is perceived as Antique, seventies to ww2 as Vintage and 80's to 95 retro and 95 to 2015 modern.

Seems about 10 years off as I recall from about 10 years ago.....
Seriously, I think this is a good definition but I consider antique as Pre WW1 (100+), Art Deco/vintage from WW1 to WW2, Mid-Century modern from WW2 to 1970's and modern from then on....I would concede and embrace the term of "Retro" from 1970 to 1985.

retro:


Mid- century:

Vintage:



(photo courtesy of Kyle)

Antique:
I wish!
I covet a WW1 or earlier porcelain(no cracks!) and a turn of the century Brandt/Omega, please pm with possibilities!
 
Posts
1,309
Likes
5,723
I have about 8 vintage pieces. Currently, my only modern piece is the 3570.50. I wear vintage pieces most days. I enjoy them as much as modern pieces.
 
Posts
1,924
Likes
4,955
almost every day, i have a couple of newies which I really like but its the vintage pieces which give me a stiffie
 
Posts
211
Likes
574
105.012 from 65.😉 IMG_7259_zpsfqv1xvtr.jpg
Edited:
 
Posts
116
Likes
1,063
I mostly wear vintage (or semi vintage) watches and that's what I prefer.
The only one that's not a vintage is my 3570.50.

Keep those oldies ticking!
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,796
Seems about 10 years off as I recall from about 10 years ago.....
Seriously, I think this is a good definition but I consider antique as Pre WW1 (100+), Art Deco/vintage from WW1 to WW2, Mid-Century modern from WW2 to 1970's and modern from then on....I would concede and embrace the term of "Retro" from 1970 to 1985.

retro:


Mid- century:

Vintage:



(photo courtesy of Kyle)

Antique:
I wish!
I covet a WW1 or earlier porcelain(no cracks!) and a turn of the century Brandt/Omega, please pm with possibilities!

Kinda works but to me art deco is a sub category as is mid century modern. Definately can't be modern after 1970, although being born on 1971 I'd like to consider myself modern but even on music that's not the case anymore.

I'd find it difficult not to see a 1950/60 watch as vintage. It may have a moderns style or a classic style to it but still it's vintage.

Same thing on 1920 to 1935. It can be modernist, Art Deco, military etc but they're still closing into antique to me, although I do concede these are sort of bridge years.

I agree typically antique is 100 yrs and over so ww1 and before, but i do feel that for wrist watches ( as opposed to pocket or wall clocks) the antique terms extends into and beyond 1st quarter of a century. An original Luois Cartier is an antique in my opinion.

Perhaps if we use the "start year" of ww2 it may for better as a vintage separator. So pre 1936 antique ( with whatever subcategory is attached to it) 1936 to 1970 Vintage ( also then with subcategories as mid century modern etc) 70 to 85 retro and after that modern... Although I think the bar is closer to 1990.

Again of course different brands and models having slight overlaps within those years.

I have a Waltham 1912 trench definately an antique , and I have a Hanmilton early 30's deco style ... Definately an antique to me. An original 1936 Panerai would seem more Vintage. Early 40's IWC and the transitional to first automatics on those years have to be vintage to me... Also as you start seeing more 36mm watches. All mid century and post ww2 to me seem definately vintage, I grant the sophistication of 50s and early 60s watches make them stand out and in many ways one would hope the late 70s and 80's where somewhat more in line with the prior decades, as such aesthetically there is more to see on 1965-72 than 72 to 85, but there's plenty on the later brands that transitions cleanly. But the 70,s did give us the digital era...

Anyway, fun stuff.

Here are some pics. all these are post ww1, all seem very much Antiques within my collection: the single pic is the Waltham which is actually pre ww1 and looks more modern than the other 3. But also an Antique.
Edited:
 
Posts
61
Likes
18
105.012 from 65 all original.😉 IMG_7259_zpsfqv1xvtr.jpg
Do you worry about the lume coming off? I've been trying hard to find a 105.012 with a nice patina and intact lume and I'm afraid I'll wear the watch and the lume will come off....?!?! Any experience with this anyone?
 
Posts
56
Likes
35
An interesting thread this. What you wanted to know about watch habits but never dared to ask. I have 4 watches. The American Waltham pw given me by my Grandad from 1916 stays in its box. I used to wear the 1978 Speedy my late Dad gave me to help me over a serious illness daily but now I'm saving it for weekends and my daily wear is my new FOIS. Then I wear my Sturmanskie Gagarin 50th weekly when I do yoga. Don't risk the Speedys on that! But I like to wind them daily so none of them feels lonely
 
Posts
110
Likes
108
I wear each of my 3 vintage constellation piepans in turn every day and the one that gets most attention / noticed is the SS connie 168.005
 
Posts
404
Likes
1,927
Only have one that's "new".....2010 Air King.

Here is one that was added just today....
........1946, 18k Pink Gold, Ref: 769, Venus Cal. 175,


1972 145.029 cal. 861
 
Posts
3,589
Likes
8,192
Kinda works but to me art deco is a sub category as is mid century modern. Definately can't be modern after 1970, although being born on 1971 I'd like to consider myself modern but even on music that's not the case anymore.

I'd find it difficult not to see a 1950/60 watch as vintage. It may have a moderns style or a classic style to it but still it's vintage.

Same thing on 1920 to 1935. It can be modernist, Art Deco, military etc but they're still closing into antique to me, although I do concede these are sort of bridge years.

I agree typically antique is 100 yrs and over so ww1 and before, but i do feel that for wrist watches ( as opposed to pocket or wall clocks) the antique terms extends into and beyond 1st quarter of a century. An original Luois Cartier is an antique in my opinion.

Perhaps if we use the "start year" of ww2 it may for better as a vintage separator. So pre 1936 antique ( with whatever subcategory is attached to it) 1936 to 1970 Vintage ( also then with subcategories as mid century modern etc) 70 to 85 retro and after that modern... Although I think the bar is closer to 1990.

Again of course different brands and models having slight overlaps within those years.

I have a Waltham 1912 trench definately an antique , and I have a Hanmilton early 30's deco style ... Definately an antique to me. An original 1936 Panerai would seem more Vintage. Early 40's IWC and the transitional to first automatics on those years have to be vintage to me... Also as you start seeing more 36mm watches. All mid century and post ww2 to me seem definately vintage, I grant the sophistication of 50s and early 60s watches make them stand out and in many ways one would hope the late 70s and 80's where somewhat more in line with the prior decades, as such aesthetically there is more to see on 1965-72 than 72 to 85, but there's plenty on the later brands that transitions cleanly. But the 70,s did give us the digital era...

Anyway, fun stuff.

Here are some pics. all these are post ww1, all seem very much Antiques within my collection: the single pic is the Waltham which is actually pre ww1 and looks more modern than the other 3. But also an Antique.


I can't argue with anything, you are absolutely right.
Words all seem to fall short, really, I think just time frames would be better as words like "Modern" will always be changing.
Here are my Omega categories
1. Pre 1915 (ish) the beginning of wristwatches from the early Brandts up to the trench watches.
2. 1915-1945 the height of the manual winds from the early calibers up to the 30mm, the golden age of the watchmaker.
3. 1945-1970(ish) the automatic age and the age of travel from the depth of the sea to outer space..
4. 1975-2000 ??? I am tempted to say the disco years but I think the techno years may be more pc.
5. 2000- the new millennium.

Again, all words fall short!
I notice these are 25-30 year spans or generations, I wonder if the dominant watch designers careers follow these same spans?
 
Posts
433
Likes
381
I wear one every day. Usually the same one for 3-4 days in a row then switch going through all of the 6 or 7 I have.
This is just about the same schedule I follow. I also have a calibre Ω1861 Speedmaster 3750.50.00 that I bought brand new in 2012 to compliment the vintage Speedies; I'll wear this one into the regular rotation pretty much the same as the vintage pieces. Occasionally I may change up a strap or bracelet. For example, I may wear the 321 on a JB champion or NASA velcro strap, or the 1861 on Omega alligator strap or NATO for a while. But mostly I wear them on their stock bracelets.
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,796
I can't argue with anything, you are absolutely right.
Words all seem to fall short, really, I think just time frames would be better as words like "Modern" will always be changing.
Here are my Omega categories
1. Pre 1915 (ish) the beginning of wristwatches from the early Brandts up to the trench watches.
2. 1915-1945 the height of the manual winds from the early calibers up to the 30mm, the golden age of the watchmaker.
3. 1945-1970(ish) the automatic age and the age of travel from the depth of the sea to outer space..
4. 1975-2000 ??? I am tempted to say the disco years but I think the techno years may be more pc.
5. 2000- the new millennium.

Again, all words fall short!
I notice these are 25-30 year spans or generations, I wonder if the dominant watch designers careers follow these same spans?

Possibly, 45 to 70 is my favorite on your list. If you. Make it 36 to 70 then I'd argue that is the golden age.... If we disregard pocket watches and focus on wrist watches.

If the 1915 years ( and I would go to 1900) is the birth of wrist watches as jewelry for women mainly and then we go into the practical use for armed forces of the wrist watch after ww1 you're left with an amazing transition into true gems of watchmaking from an aesthetic point, but the advances made during and post ww2 are horologicaly more relevant and ingenious no? Or perhaps I'm wrong. It's my perception anyway. The demands placed on (wrist) watchmaking during those years and the sheer work load gave us the best movements ever made, and some of the most inventive.
 
Posts
3,589
Likes
8,192
but the advances made during and post ww2 are horologicaly more relevant and ingenious no? Or perhaps I'm wrong. It's my perception anyway.

I agree, the greatest era of the designer, but the golden years of the watchmaker at his bench ended before WWII.
 
Posts
211
Likes
574
Do you worry about the lume coming off? I've been trying hard to find a 105.012 with a nice patina and intact lume and I'm afraid I'll wear the watch and the lume will come off....?!?! Any experience with this anyone?

No i'm not worry about the lume, find a good a Speedy and wear it. 😉
 
Posts
6
Likes
4
every day...I wear a '68 Seamaster DeVille, an early 70's Wittnauer Professional Chronograph and a '46 Harman chronograph alternately...Dad used to say.."you can't tell if you're having a good time...without a good time piece"!
 
Posts
34
Likes
33
I rotate and wear a different one every day. Watched are made to be admired on your wrist, not in a display case 😉