JimInOz
··Melbourne AustraliaIncidentally, some background to this purchase:
I wanted to buy a modern yellow gold watch of 36-37mm. However, there are very few options available.
I was chewing over a Patek 5196 second hand and thought, "hmm I am paying a lot of money for technology that hasn't change for 100 years. As yellow gold is a bit of experiment, why not buy a watch from when modestly sized gold watches were commonplace?"
So I started looking for a relatively "large" vintage gold watch whose appearance is quite classic. My shortlist was the watch I bought, or a IWC CAL. 89. My son, who has far better taste than I, pointed me to the Omega.
It's a lovely looking little watch and despite the timegrapher data seems to keep okay time.
A couple of things that surprise me are that the movement appears to be non-hacking and also it is quite heavy to wind fully. But then, my point of reference is the modern watches I own.
My purchase is not cast in stone. I like the little Omega very much, but if it has issues it will go back to the dealer.
If you're unwilling to share the dealer identity, can you post a concise/verbatim description of the sale text.
The fact that performance of the watch which has been "recently serviced" is what it is would raise my concerns about the validity of the sellers assessments.

