dsio
··Ash @ ΩFAfter this btw, the elves are going to be out there trying to assemble 2915s, making more fake listings, cooking up 321 dials in ovens to get that same tropical patina, the money does invite that
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
After this btw, the elves are going to be out there trying to assemble 2915s, making more fake listings, cooking up 321 dials in ovens to get that same tropical patina, the money does invite that
A 2915 dial is rare, then the case too. I doubt this will happen in a way that would convince.
Does putting a vintage dial in the oven make it go tropical? anyone putting a nice 2915 dial in the oven needs his head looking at 😁
Cheers, Michael
Mate a dial doesn’t have to even look plausible to go through some auction houses, I remember 9 years ago there was a record sale of a Neptune at Christie’s, from memory it went for 258k. Within a month 4 bogus ones came out of the woodwork including this gem at AQ
https://omegaforums.net/threads/antiquorum-another-neptune-seamaster-cloisonne.2576/
Auction houses have been implicated for a long time, it’s looking like NFTs are largely being used to launder money from illegal casinos now too
https://www.ft.com/content/c7883919-26e5-49f5-816b-de1747232506
Implicated.
Anything proved?
Implication is easy, anyone can implicate.
Seems very far fetched to me.
I can implicate many better ways to launder money. All of them having less press coverage.
Surely that would be the most important element if laundering.
so, trying to seem objective here... How come this watch fetched such a higher amount than the previous record holding 2915s: like, by almost 2million??
a watch maybe easier to stash somewhere than a few million dollars in cash
This is for sure. Though vintage watches feel different to me than jewels or paintings by the masters; it takes some significant bet that a single, specific, collectible like this watch will retain much of a $3.5M market into the future (understanding these folks are willing to “pay” for the ability to stash *much* of $3.5M in a pocket, but the question is how much).
uniqueness is questionable in vintage watches
All I mean is, there appears to be more certainty that a Picasso will continue to be mostly as valuable in the future, than there is certainty a specific model of brown speedmaster will continue to be mostly valuable.
But, none of this changes that there were at least three people that wanted to fit $3.5M in their pocket.
I've said it before and I say it again: Phillips may sell all of my watches... Think I can retire once they are done
it is not about the watch, it is about money
it is an attempt to bake some money into the form of easier transferrable storage
a watch maybe easier to stash somewhere than a few million dollars in cash
so does the paintings for tens to hundreds millions
in china, there used to be gemstone / jades for that purpose