AR Scratches

Posts
389
Likes
569
I disagree. I polished off the ar on my first 8500 planet ocean and it made a huge difference. I ended up selling it off because I felt it really ruined it
Each to their own.
 
Posts
387
Likes
274
I disagree. I polished off the ar on my first 8500 planet ocean and it made a huge difference. I ended up selling it off because I felt it really ruined it

Ah - that's a shame! Did you replace it with a newer PO?
 
Posts
535
Likes
854
My goal was to replace it with a speedmaster, but I broke and ended up buying the exact same watch but with orange numerals. And an intact AR coating of course😉
 
Posts
183
Likes
206
My goal was to replace it with a speedmaster, but I broke and ended up buying the exact same watch but with orange numerals. And an intact AR coating of course😉
There is a reason that camera lenses are coated both on the outside and the inside surfaces... it’s no different for a watch crystal. Put an AR coating on the inside and you cut down on some reflections. Put an AR coating on the outside as well and you’ve cut down on an even greater amount of reflection, and the more important ones too, the ones that reflect light off the crystal back at your eye. The AR coating on the inside of the crystal only cuts the reflection coming off the dial back at the underside of the crystal.
 
Posts
795
Likes
1,157
There is a reason that camera lenses are coated both on the outside and the inside surfaces... it’s no different for a watch crystal. ...................
........................................................................................................

Yes, but a camera lens is much less prone to get scratched.
 
Posts
183
Likes
206
Yes, but a camera lens is much less prone to get scratched.
Well yes and no (I guess it depends on how you use/treat your watch or lens. The number one reason photographers put a filter on their lenses is to protect the front element from scratching. Cheaper to replace a filter than the front element. Maybe OP needs a protector dome over his crystal...jk
 
Posts
389
Likes
569
Well yes and no (I guess it depends on how you use/treat your watch or lens. The number one reason photographers put a filter on their lenses is to protect the front element from scratching. Cheaper to replace a filter than the front element. Maybe OP needs a protector dome over his crystal...jk
Camera lenses aren't usually made of scratch resistant sapphire crystal?
Now I've removed the AR, there should hopefully be no scratching issues?
 
Posts
389
Likes
569
Photo's show with scratched AR and with removed AR.
You can see how 'milky' looking the dial is with the AR, removed it's like the dial has been polished and IMO, no more or less reflections.
An improvement in my eyes.
 
Posts
440
Likes
574
Photo's show with scratched AR and with removed AR.
You can see how 'milky' looking the dial is with the AR, removed it's like the dial has been polished and IMO, no more or less reflections.
An improvement in my eyes.
I'm sorry, and I don't want to be rude, but... if you want to proof your point, you have to take pictures under a bright sky, not in a dark room with one light spot. It's obvious that a dark room doesn't makes reflections. Sorry, again. 😗
 
Posts
389
Likes
569
I'm sorry, and I don't want to be rude, but... if you want to proof your point, you have to take pictures under a bright sky, not in a dark room with one light spot. It's obvious that a dark room doesn't makes reflections. Sorry, again. 😗
That's all from me now.
Like I said, I prefer it without.
Daylight photo just taken at the angle I view my watch when looking at it on my wrist...perfect!
 
Posts
64
Likes
110
Always prefered the older Seamaster crystals with AR on inside only.
 
Posts
56
Likes
27
Actual message sent to my AD from Omega.

Hey Paul, just heard back from Omega. They say that it isn’t the first time they’ve received complaints about the coating but they do deem it down to wear and tear so it isn’t covered by warranty unfortunately 🙁
Argh what a shame. IMHO they shouldn't be putting on the outside of the crystal.
 
Posts
56
Likes
27
That's all from me now.
Like I said, I prefer it without.
Daylight photo just taken at the angle I view my watch when looking at it on my wrist...perfect!
Wow, not bad at all.

My little Hamilton Khaki Field auto has a silver dial and no AR on its sapphire crystal... Even then it's not too reflective as to be unreadable

I've had dive watches with glossy black dials (Christopher Ward) and only inner ar coating and they were fine to use in the Texas sun at noon in July.
 
Posts
714
Likes
719
I too prefer AR on the inside only, but none of my watches with AR on the outside look THAT bad lol.

Although now this makes me want to take the AR coating off of my Breitling Colt.. out of all of my watches that one probably has the most wear and tear.