Advice on first Constellation purchase

Posts
6,065
Likes
9,379
I have one myself, but I am not about to take it apart to find out. However, since the crown came loose recently, it will have to be taken to a watchmaker soon 😵‍💫
.

Are you not able to tell if the dial edges are angled from the front?
If not, seeing the dial out of the case would be very useful.

if it is a painted dome dial, then ‘faux pie pan’ works for me.
 
Posts
6,065
Likes
9,379
The OVDB entry re. pie pan dials I take as a generic remark, just like they don't state the various case metal types some of the references come in, but only mentions "gold cap", for instance.

Its been often quoted, as a justification of painted dome dials being pie-pans, that some of the OVDB entries for the older dome dials with circular painted outer edges refer to pie pan dials.

But as you say, the term pie-pan is a relatively modern construct - but it is much easier than writing ‘dial with flat inner pane and 12 angled facets around the outer edge’. 😀
 
Posts
335
Likes
999
Are you not able to tell if the dial edges are angled from the front?
If not, seeing the dial out of the case would be very useful.

I have in my posession all versions, and all were serviced by Johannes at Watchguy, who is always kind enough to take copious pictures of the dial, back and front, so here goes:

First are two, as I would call them, "soft pie pan" 168.004:

No 1 front:


No 1 back:



No 2 front:



No 2 back:



And for comparison

a 168.010:

a 167.005:



and a 18k 168.006 which is even more pronounced:


And finally a run-of-the-mill dome dial 168.005 (it's the one mentioned above, previously of Davidt's):



So, in conclusion, looks to me that we are dealing more with trompe l'oeils than not with those 168.004 ...
 
Posts
9,596
Likes
27,692
Its been often quoted, as a justification of painted dome dials being pie-pans, that some of the OVDB entries for the older dome dials with circular painted outer edges refer to pie pan dials.

But as you say, the term pie-pan is a relatively modern construct - but it is much easier than writing ‘dial with flat inner pane and 12 angled facets around the outer edge’. 😀

My point was that the OVDB refers to some references that come with different dial types as only having a single type of dial, just as it often only mentions a single type of case material, even though several exists.
 
Posts
6,065
Likes
9,379
My point was that the OVDB refers to some references that come with different dial types as only having a single type of dial, just as it often only mentions a single type of case material, even though several exists.
Ah! yes, I see what you mean.
 
Posts
6,065
Likes
9,379
I have in my posession all versions,

So, in conclusion, looks to me that we are dealing more with trompe l'oeils than not with those 168.004 ...

Splendid!
A definite 10 out of 10 for illustration of the different types of dial.
So, now we know - trompe l'oeil it is.
And 'faux pie pan' it will be in my vocabulary from now on
 
Posts
23,389
Likes
52,018
I have in my posession all versions, and all were serviced by Johannes at Watchguy, who is always kind enough to take copious pictures of the dial, back and front, so here goes:

So, in conclusion, looks to me that we are dealing more with trompe l'oeils than not with those 168.004 ...

Great photos.
 
Posts
9
Likes
10
Really cool discussion guys -- already feel much smarter than yesterday 😀. Let me know if better to start a new thread, but thoughts on this one on Chrono24? Is it a redail? It maybe looks over-polished?

-REF 168.010
-$2160 USD

21658714-c92i1k7z8ya0q1oajl9hccz3-ExtraLarge.jpg 21658714-msaanmu1gyne4hzvaijv4ggn-ExtraLarge.jpg
21658714-ifaxk0rznp0jidstsva027uz-ExtraLarge.jpg
21658714-jz01i6e6vs61m1635tfjjuic-ExtraLarge.jpg
21658714-dzrbdjmn16axe06hx8qwmpjq-ExtraLarge.jpg
21658714-ano88j7csnqmul5xshnesilr-ExtraLarge.jpg


Or this one on eBay? Soft/polished lugs?
-Gold Capped
-REF 168.005
-$1200 USD
s-l1600.jpg
s-l1600.jpg
s-l1600.jpg
s-l1600.jpg
s-l1600.jpg
s-l1600.jpg
Edited:
 
Posts
17,598
Likes
36,806
.........................

But as you say, the term pie-pan is a relatively modern construct - but it is much easier than writing ‘dial with flat inner pane and 12 angled facets around the outer edge’. 😀

It would be just as easy to write the correct descriptor, i.e.: “douze pans”.

“douze pans” (translated, “twelve-sided”), which was the legitimate description of it by Omega when first released and, indeed, long after.

From a good discussion piece about the "pie pan" by Desmond (@mondodec) on his blog site.
 
Posts
23,389
Likes
52,018
how did you tell a redial ?

Bad printing, wrong position of minute markers, etc. Takes experience.
 
Posts
9
Likes
10
The first one is a fair bit overpriced and the second is a redial.

Is there anything in particular about the first one that makes it overpriced at ~$2200? Or is $2200 just too high of a price in general for a Constellation? Still new and learning where to look, but it doesn't seem like there's a lot out there that look halfway decent for under $2000?
 
Posts
3,323
Likes
12,939
Is there anything in particular about the first one that makes it overpriced at ~$2200? Or is $2200 just too high of a price in general for a Constellation? Still new and learning where to look, but it doesn't seem like there's a lot out there that look halfway decent for under $2000?

Constellations we’re built in vast variations over the decades. Different models have wildly varying degrees of collectibility to nerds like us - there are genuine Constellation references that’ll set you back 500€ for a good example. Others are so special and rare, they might achieve 100x that.

In the end, the market dictates a price, 168.010s just don’t get the love the 50s examples or dogleg references are experiencing, so at auction they usually sell for roughly 1200-1300$ or so (with a pie pan dial! Much less in a dome dial configuration).
 
Posts
503
Likes
778
Also good to add that price will be different based on the state of the watch (polished, all original, etc), and you often pay a bit extra when you buy from a dealer (with some 'guarantee), compared to buying directly from a private seller.

I'd say for around 2200 USD, you should be able to get a solid gold version of the same model.
 
Posts
411
Likes
626
My humble contribution to the discussion (bringing water to yoit mill)
Left: 14381 ref. Right: 168.004.
In real life these dials are similar, at least to me 😉
 
Posts
9
Likes
10
Not sure I'm in love with this one (it could just be the gold bracelet), but wanted to get any feedback on this one? Are the lugs edges too smoothed over or is that just the photo? How do you generally feel about patina on the dial? Is it charming or a turn off (or depends)?

-168.005
-14k gold filled
-auction, currently ~$1000 USD

475225413_15d83c5c-aeb6-476c-ac91-3a9629b2dfb9.jpg
475225413_5325106e-b69c-4ec9-aea9-50d318f6095d.jpg
475225413_7d3670f1-f0b3-4ff3-ab20-61e0a0aaee03.jpg
475225413_39e81465-7bd2-46a3-9692-31c453095ccb.jpg
 
Posts
213
Likes
263
Constellations we’re built in vast variations over the decades. Different models have wildly varying degrees of collectibility to nerds like us - there are genuine Constellation references that’ll set you back 500€ for a good example. Others are so special and rare, they might achieve 100x that.

In the end, the market dictates a price, 168.010s just don’t get the love the 50s examples or dogleg references are experiencing, so at auction they usually sell for roughly 1200-1300$ or so (with a pie pan dial! Much less in a dome dial configuration).

I've noticed this! I've just picked up a nice 168.010 dome dial, and my other Constellation is a 168.016 day-date (which has a flatter dial with wider hands and thus a very subtle hint of the impending early 70s). I love these watches, they have a classic, generic-1960s watch look that's timeless. I think the dog-leg pie pans are lovely, but they look like - well - very much like what they are, and no mistaking it! I rather like the more anonymous elegance of the round-case dome dials.

A question: The 168.010 in particular has a very similar aesthetic to the 1960s Seamaster De Villes, with its domed dial and straight, rectangular lugs. The Seamasters are highly desireble, but the 168.010 Constellation dome dials seemingly less so. Is this just because they don't represent the "iconic" Constellation, while in the case of the Seamaster this style IS the iconic one for that line?

That said, perhaps they attract similar prices to the Seamasters - just not the prices that the more iconic Constellations attract?