3861 initial thoughts...

Posts

28,025

Likes

71,525

Archer

·Jul 22, 2019·Omega Qualified Watchmaker

abrod520

One Q - is the movement in this model Moonshine gold? I thought that was only for the full-gold 50th model, no?

Looking at the Omega web site, it shows the rhodium version for this watch.

 

S

Posts

331

Likes

195

stuart70

·Jul 22, 2019

Good post. I know I am probably in the minority but I will be happy to stick with my 1861.

 

Posts

5,048

Likes

15,518

eugeneandresson

·Jul 22, 2019

Archer

There is zero evidence to suggest that one or the other will be called "3861M" in any official Omega documentation. I'm going to suggest it's not the Extranet that is misleading here.

https://www.omegawatches.com/media/pdf/watches/product-sheet/gb/en-gb/31020425001001-en-gb.pdf

https://www.omegawatches.com/media/pdf/watches/product-sheet/gb/en-gb/31060425099001-en-gb.pdf

Bunch of misleading 'bastedzz' now aren't they 😉

Edited: Jul 22, 2019

 

Posts

28,025

Likes

71,525

Archer

·Jul 22, 2019·Omega Qualified Watchmaker

Search for "3861 msg" - results - "No result found"...

Search for REF 31060425099001

000 MATERIAL: Gold Other / Métal
Calibre: 3861
In collection: YES
qty limited series total: 1014

No Monosodium Glutamate mentioned...

 

Posts

273

Likes

888

astrand

·Jul 22, 2019

I love reading these, even if I do not understand half of it yet.

Thanks,
Alex.

 

T

Posts

93

Likes

61

thewodg

·Jul 22, 2019

Thanks for the detailed and informative post! So for a relative newbie who is finally ready to splash out on a Moonwatch and based solely on movement considerations, would you recommend that I pick up the current 311.30.42.30.01.005 with the 1861 or wait a revised model with a 3861?

 

Posts

3,171

Likes

8,315

blufinz52

·Jul 22, 2019·Hears dead people, not watch rotors.

Lots of highly technical information that goes completely over my head. Similar to the technical information on the new mid-engine Corvette that I recently read...all very nice, but here's what I got out of it; 490 horse power and 0-60 in 3.2 seconds. Barrels, co-axial, escapement, jigawatts, flux-capacitor...does the watch keep good time? That's all I need to know. 👍

 

Posts

1,396

Likes

2,705

Martin_J_N

·Jul 22, 2019

S stuart70

Good post. I know I am probably in the minority but I will be happy to stick with my 1861.

You're not alone, I am more than happy with my 1861

 

Posts

9,595

Likes

27,672

ConElPueblo

·Jul 22, 2019

eugeneandresson

https://www.omegawatches.com/media/pdf/watches/product-sheet/gb/en-gb/31020425001001-en-gb.pdf

https://www.omegawatches.com/media/pdf/watches/product-sheet/gb/en-gb/31060425099001-en-gb.pdf

Bunch of misleading 'bastedzz' now aren't they 😉

Surely 'msg' = Moonshine Gold? 'O' I would guess designated 'oro' or Sigma. Makes sense to use the shorter term in technical papers, etc.

 

Posts

21,729

Likes

49,301

Dan S

·Jul 22, 2019

T thewodg

Thanks for the detailed and informative post! So for a relative newbie who is finally ready to splash out on a Moonwatch and based solely on movement considerations, would you recommend that I pick up the current 311.30.42.30.01.005 with the 1861 or wait a revised model with a 3861?

There are many threads on the topic of co-axial vs. conventional Omega movements. Here is one:

https://omegaforums.net/threads/co-ax-vs-non-co-ax.43575/

 

T

Posts

93

Likes

61

thewodg

·Jul 22, 2019

Dan S

There are many threads on the topic of co-axial vs. conventional Omega movements. Here is one:

https://omegaforums.net/threads/co-ax-vs-non-co-ax.43575/

Thanks. I'm still trying to figure out how to efficiently use the search function...

 

Posts

21,729

Likes

49,301

Dan S

·Jul 22, 2019

T thewodg

Thanks. I'm still trying to figure out how to efficiently use the search function...

Sometimes it can be better to use Google using site😲megaforums.net to limit the search.

Edit: sorry, I tried to type ": o" without the space, and it converted to that smiley.

Edited: Jul 22, 2019

 

T

Posts

93

Likes

61

thewodg

·Jul 22, 2019

Thanks for the tip!

 

Posts

531

Likes

1,183

EricCsN

·Jul 22, 2019

I read the post 3 times and my head is still spinning .. my respect to a true master

 

Posts

2,235

Likes

3,458

Meme-Dweller

·Jul 22, 2019

Oooooh, so we finally have a Speedy Professional movement that hacks?

 

Posts

11,928

Likes

39,243

abrod520

·Jul 22, 2019

Meme-Dweller

Oooooh, so we finally have a Speedy Professional movement that hacks?

I didn't notice it hacking, but I'll check and confirm when I get home later

 

Posts

3,247

Likes

6,329

fskywalker

·Jul 22, 2019

Thanks for sharing Al

 

Posts

2,026

Likes

7,157

MTROIS

·Jul 22, 2019

ConElPueblo

Surely 'msg' = Moonshine Gold? 'O' I would guess designated 'oro' or Sigma. Makes sense to use the shorter term in technical papers, etc.

Indeed, the normal, assumption for MSG would be MoonShine(TM) Gold... but this comes from an English version of marketing tool, so it may not represent the official name as per Omega’s part number list... as indicated by Al.
O would stand for Or (French word for gold)… just like OM on the dial of the original 1970 BA145.022 (OM SWISS MADE OM) stood for Or Massif (ie, solid gold)... which on the 50th anniversary version could be equated to Or MoonShine(TM)… Et la boucle, est bouclée!! 😁

Edited: Jul 22, 2019

 

Posts

11,928

Likes

39,243

abrod520

·Jul 22, 2019

Meme-Dweller

Oooooh, so we finally have a Speedy Professional movement that hacks?

Yep, it hacks. Totally missed that when I first wound it up and set it.

 

Posts

2,006

Likes

3,382

rob#1

·Jul 23, 2019

Great thread, very informative 👍