145.006 / 145.016 Seamaster Chronograph Research Thread

Posts
280
Likes
268
The archives say...
Reference: ST 145.006
Calibre: 321 (manual-winding chronograph with 30-minute and 12- hour recorders)
Movement N°: 25.44xxxx
Model: Seamaster
Metal: Stainless steel
Dial: Black with luminous indexes
Production: January 26, 1968 Delivered to: Australia

Excellent and that's my birthday, let me know if you ever looking to sell 😉
 
Posts
4,113
Likes
16,307
@Risto may this thread remain a research thread. This particular variation is now well enough documented, thanks to your photographs 👍
 
Posts
4,113
Likes
16,307
I won’t post any more 😀

I am sure many members here, including myself will keep enjoying your beautiful photographs. Why not in a dedicated thread. The watch clearly deserves it. 😉
 
Posts
4,113
Likes
16,307
There's this gold 145.016 on sale on eBay.

It has pointy hands, not straight cut like most of these variations.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/254976352187


👍 Those hands have the same shape like on your SS watch, don’t they?

To me it looks legit with that dial. And rather nice 😀
Edited by a mod:
 
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
Posts
4,113
Likes
16,307
Must be a really rare model.

I wouldn't call it a model. It's a 145.016. These watches weren't produced in thousands of examples so it can well be that some of them were assembled with what they had in their parts at that time. Wouldn't be the first reference where such things can be observed.

But it's def interesting to log that dial / hands combination here 👍
 
Posts
1,593
Likes
4,952
I guess I meant a variation.

Sure, at that time and earlier 1960s Seamaster chronographs shared so many dial variations.
 
Posts
271
Likes
331
Just picked up a gold 145.016 myself. Debating where to send for service being its missing a pusher and I don't have a way to source one.
 
Posts
271
Likes
331
I sent mine back to Omega Geneva, it's worth it.

Well that’s happening for sure. Do those pics come with it once it comes back? I’ve never seen omega do that stuff!

Your dial looks incredible. Mine has some issues around the 11 o’clock marker, wonder if a replacement dial would be NOS
 
Posts
2,718
Likes
5,539
As I understand these restorations, it is a very good possibility the dial will be a redial restoration or a service dial, not NOS.
 
Posts
377
Likes
649
As I understand these restorations, it is a very good possibility the dial will be a redial restoration or a service dial, not NOS.

Looks like the restoration shown by @rhino7 above would have involved dial restoration (assuming anything was wrong with the dial) rather than a service dial, give the tritium markers.

This raises a question I've been wondering about for ages - does Omega actually make service dials for the 145.006 / 145.016? Has anyone seen one out in the wild or on a parts list?
 
Posts
6
Likes
43
Well that’s happening for sure. Do those pics come with it once it comes back? I’ve never seen omega do that stuff!

Your dial looks incredible. Mine has some issues around the 11 o’clock marker, wonder if a replacement dial would be NOS
The pics I requested, though they may well have provided them anyway. There was no charge for the pics.
It was full restoration service and took about 6 months. Here's a photo of all parts replaced. One of the hands was actually bent. Cost was around $1100 AUD.
Very happy with the outcome.
 
Posts
4,113
Likes
16,307
Very nice ! Contrats for your puchase 👍
 
Posts
27,677
Likes
70,322
Looks like the restoration shown by @rhino7 above would have involved dial restoration (assuming anything was wrong with the dial) rather than a service dial, give the tritium markers.

This raises a question I've been wondering about for ages - does Omega actually make service dials for the 145.006 / 145.016? Has anyone seen one out in the wild or on a parts list?

No dials are currently available for those cases, so any dial that was sent in that was deemed unacceptable by Omega, would be refinished.