WRUW Today?

Posts
3,849
Likes
27,360
IMG_3999_2.jpg
 
Posts
16,911
Likes
154,861
Just out of the box,
file-157.jpg

file-158.jpg
 
Posts
5,753
Likes
2,936

What.................? Never seen connie dial like this before........🥰 . Tell us more about this Dennis. And I would like to Dibs if you want to flip it............
 
Posts
4,440
Likes
11,297
Probably the last couple of days with this one...

7974298126_7241877d8e_b.jpg
 
Posts
25,980
Likes
27,647
What.................? Never seen connie dial like this before........🥰 . Tell us more about this Dennis.

The caliber 712 was Omega's joint venture with Rayville / Blancpain and Piguet to make an ultra-thin automatic. Skinny self winding movements were desired by the public and the 60's saw quite a few come to market. Piaget was one of the first with the microrotor caliber 12P in 1961, The 71x came in 1964, and AP / VC / JLC introduced the cream of the crop with the 202x/102x/92x in 1967.

The one odd thing is that the 712 is the chronometer. Most of the chronometer full rotor calibers of the era end in a 1.

And I would like to Dibs if you want to flip it............
Steve has first right of refusal in case he wants to buy it back, then Bryce who inadvertently picked up a redialed model but returned it, but I'll put you on the list.
 
Posts
5,753
Likes
2,936
The caliber 712 was Omega's joint venture with Rayville / Blancpain and Piguet to make an ultra-thin automatic. Skinny self winding movements were desired by the public and the 60's saw quite a few come to market. Piaget was one of the first with the microrotor caliber 12P in 1961, The 71x came in 1964, and AP / VC / JLC introduced the cream of the crop with the 202x/102x/92x in 1967.

The one odd thing is that the 712 is the chronometer. Most of the chronometer full rotor calibers of the era end in a 1.

Thanks for the enlightenment. Incidentally I just bought a Deville with 711 movement hours ago, now I know the story behind the thin calibre. The looks of the movement is not as nice as Cal 5XX though. Just curious why they bother to put a movement without second hand to chronometer spec.

Steve has first right of refusal in case he wants to buy it back, then Bryce who inadvertently picked up a redialed model but returned it, but I'll put you on the list.
No problem.....thanks for putting me in the list.
 
Posts
25,980
Likes
27,647
Just curious why they bother to put a movement without second hand to chronometer spec..

The lack of a second hand enables the movement to be thinner. It still can keep time within chronometer specs regardless of it having a second hand or not. The capability of having a second hand is there, just not the parts/wheels to support it.
 
Posts
12,743
Likes
17,255
IWC c-case today. Note that I'm using a lower case "c", since it is much smaller and thinner than the Omega version:

KGrHqFjEFe3QbKkNBQhoMBseQ60_57.jpg

2403.jpg

TGIF,
gatorcpa
 
Posts
16,911
Likes
154,861
It had a lonely look so out it comes.
file-160.jpg