Wonky looking font on a 1680

Posts
2,498
Likes
7,577
This popped up for sale on my IG feed, I'm past vintage Rolex now but always keen to know more and to look what's genuine / authentic or not.

This 1680 font on the case, looks hand etched?

Doesn't seem right?



Whilst looking at something like Hqmilton's 1680

fe6c099c0f41763dd4bbf27b0ffab460afa5b3e9.jpg
 
Posts
21,626
Likes
48,995
Are there faint engraving under that wonky engraving? I wonder if the originals were lost, so someone hand-engraved the numbers.
 
Posts
2,306
Likes
5,639
Doesn't seem right?
Looks fine to me.
Here's one I sold just a few months ago. (5.6 Mil serial range).

 
Posts
2,498
Likes
7,577
Looks fine to me.
Here's one I sold just a few months ago. (5.6 Mil serial range).

I see! Can you share why is this deemed ok? or does Rolex have QC problems back then where this is accepted and normal?

Thanks in advance!
 
Posts
30,837
Likes
36,274
Weirdly Rolex still has QC issues in a large scale even in recent years so I wouldn't be overly surprised if this is fine...
 
Posts
8,742
Likes
69,426
Over time, Rolex has had some weird and wonky crap going on with engravings and dials and fonts and etc.

This is but one example, and one of the less obscure.
 
Posts
2,306
Likes
5,639
I see! Can you share why is this deemed ok? or does Rolex have QC problems back then where this is accepted and normal?
Not a QC issue necessarily.
The serial number/model reference number font changed from year to year.
It is pretty common to see "Wonky" Sixes, Eights, etc..

Here's a 1978 also from HQ Milton site. Check out that same "Wonky" 8


And another:



Don't forget that back in the day this was just a $300 steel tool watch.
Nobody really cared about how neat the font on a serial number which 99.999999999% of the buyers would ever see or care about...
Edited:
 
Posts
563
Likes
1,356
There was once a member who declare loudly that the serial number is forged.
 
Posts
495
Likes
1,042
I saw this 1680 on my IG feed too, it is available for sale.

Even if Rolex changed the serial number/model reference number font from year to year, wouldn't they at least use a "template" for each font? 😕
 
Posts
2,498
Likes
7,577
Not a QC issue necessarily.
The serial number/model reference number font changed from year to year.
It is pretty common to see "Wonky" Sixes, Eights, etc..

Here's a 1978 also from HQ Milton site. Check out that same "Wonky" 8


And another:



Don't forget that back in the day this was just a $300 steel tool watch.
Nobody really cared about how neat the font on a serial number which 99.999999999% of the buyers would ever see or care about...
Thanks for the insight.

I guess i'm wondering as some websites such https://www.worthy.com/blog/its-about-time/how-to-spot-a-fake-rolex/ talk about how the numbers on the case are not sharp etc. However, i also think thats for modern pieces instead of vintage ones.
 
Posts
2,498
Likes
7,577
I saw this 1680 on my IG feed too, it is available for sale.

Even if Rolex changed the serial number/model reference number font from year to year, wouldn't they at least use a "template" for each font? 😕

The seller on IG is quite a popular Rolex Repair/watchguy so I think/know he's legit. It's just that the wonky font looks almost hand inscribed, I'm wondering if "replicas" or "Franken" pieces could have their cases measured and made (imagine unpolished bevels and chamfers), and just do a semi-half assed job of inscribing the number onto the case and go "wow its a nice vintage piece etc" especially when unpolished chamfers and bevels are so sought after by collectors. We really can't tell what's okay or whats not.
 
Posts
495
Likes
1,042
The seller on IG is quite a popular Rolex Repair/watchguy so I think/know he's legit. It's just that the wonky font looks almost hand inscribed, I'm wondering if "replicas" or "Franken" pieces could have their cases measured and made (imagine unpolished bevels and chamfers), and just do a semi-half assed job of inscribing the number onto the case and go "wow its a nice vintage piece etc" especially when unpolished chamfers and bevels are so sought after by collectors. We really can't tell what's okay or whats not.

I would not be surprised if that was possible with the precision steel cutting technologies we have these days.

That's the thing, it does look hand etched to me. It doesn't help that the wonky 6's and 8's are not consistent. I think there is another thread on OF discussing the authenticity of no. 6 end-links and the font on the number 6 is kind of wonky too but at least, the wonkiness is consistent from one authentic end-link to another.
 
Posts
43
Likes
184
All the serial engravings are perfect on mine. You can see the 8, 6 and 9.

Not sure why some look badly hand engraved.

This is a 1967 1675. But I’ve also checked my 5513 and DRSD and all engravings are uniform and normal.

 
Posts
1,093
Likes
5,549
For a company so focused on perfection the have managed to slip lots of little errors into production which fuel the hype surrounding the name. As said previously not sure messing with me del and serial number font would work in quite the same way but whole they have been outsourcing case production in 60s and 70s? Maybe the cases shown came from same supplier.
That said I think I would have to have it independently verified and case back off before parting with the cash just to be sure.
 
Posts
296
Likes
1,081
The wonky 6 and 8 feels a little off, but i've seen some others whom have similar font/engraving but have cleared the forums' test. i guess as what the others have chimed in on: rolex did have some weird little QC oversights along the way. overall, looks fine