Which one would you rather have ?

Posts
5,636
Likes
5,793
I guess I prefer the Aqua Terra beacuse Rolex styling turns me off. If they ever brought back dauphine hands, I might change my mind.
 
Posts
6,524
Likes
26,480
Neither. However, if I HAD to spend money I would get the Hulk. But then I would sell it.
 
Posts
189
Likes
313
Hulk everyday, the AT is too much of too much, plus if you tried to sell it on its the equivalent of a buying a fully loaded luxury car new, going to lose so much money on it and it will be a hard sell.
 
Posts
305
Likes
570
Hulk because it just seems to be in my subconscious all the time.
 
Posts
521
Likes
788
B Bmw1
That’s exactly why I want it. it looks just like any other watch, but when you hold it the difference is immediately felt. btw it weighs about 270 grams.
I actually checked the steel version in the boutique yesterday and let me tell you the steel felt like titanium in comparison lol.
I guess I'm a freak because I prefer the Omega. The Hulk looks like an Invicta to me and the Omega seems like it would actually wear a bit more subtle, meaning I doubt it's very loud on the wrist. I love heavy watches too, and flying under the radar, so the Stealth Wealth aspect of this appeals to me. (BTW is that a term here? We use it on car forums to imply something expensive and well made that the average person has no idea about, like a brand new Toyota Land Cruiser that lists at $90,000+ retail.) Somebody also suggested you would lose money on the Omega if you sold it, but how much lower can the bottom drop out at the asking price vs MSRP you quoted? Finally, and I have no idea, but if this really is a rare model that would be exciting for me, tho a secondary consideration. Please come back and show us what you end up with!
 
Posts
572
Likes
754
I would buy neither - not the Aqua Terra, because I find it too much design wise, and not the Hulk because Rolex ss demand is a bubble, albeit a persistent one.