Which one would you prefer ?

Posts
56
Likes
613
Ugh, both a beauty, great patina <3, but I will have to go with Rolex.
 
Posts
986
Likes
3,007
Big triangle and sword hands combo make it a win over a very handsome sub.
 
Posts
25
Likes
15
The one without the date. I hate watches with a date window
 
Posts
408
Likes
953
The sub without doubt. Those guilt ones are crazy especially in this condition
 
Posts
241
Likes
2,435
If equal condition I go for the Seamaster but the patina is a little too much so I end up with the sub.
 
Posts
13,136
Likes
52,187
Seamaster because I already own the Rolex.
 
Posts
230
Likes
598
Rolex because the condition relative to other Subs is much better than the Seamaster relative to other Seamasters.

Patina on the Seamaster is a bit too much, and prefer the no-date version (as has previously been said).

Sub has a nice lightly ghosted bezel that still has its pip, good even patina, and nice gilt dial.

Out of curiosity, are these being offered for anywhere near the same price?
 
Posts
1,541
Likes
3,350
Omega. Sword hands and I don't like the blobs on the Rolex.
 
Posts
2,675
Likes
7,487
Omega. Sword hands and I don't like the blobs on the Rolex.
The blob? Did you even look at the pic in the OP?
 
Posts
2,710
Likes
17,410
Ignoring the financial value aspect I am leaning slightly toward the SM300....