What modern watches will be "future classics"?

Posts
16,856
Likes
47,859
I would be buying all 6105, 6306, 6309 and 7002 Seiko dive watches that are in good condition.

Also with so many modded the good condition ones will go up
 
Posts
40
Likes
86
Zenith Flyback Rainbow from late 90's
Rolex Submariner 14060M
These are not for sale any longer but who knows they might become future classics.
Although it is not a model I am too familiar with the Jaeger Le Coultre master triple calendar could be a future classic especially with the steel bracelet.
 
Posts
302
Likes
1,185
Fun question. A game I like to play looking much sooner into the future just to have the next sought after watch but the long term outlook of watch collecting has always been on my mind. I believe someone will be collecting even if they do have a brain implant in their head connecting to their smartworld in order to tell time. There will always be the top end brands and complications or rarities that will be hightly sought after but if I think about it from my perspective I have to ask what do I collect and why? Is it a watch like the Speedmaster that is linked to a momentous event like the moon landing? I remember seeing one at a junk/antique shop in the 70s and later in life worked designing rocket engine thrust chambers. So its connection to the space program means something to me. Is it a watch like a vintage Submariner that started as a high end tool watch to be used in the deeps and that always stood out to me as an "old money" watch because my father was wearing a Timex instead of a Sub? I have his Omega and Elgin award watches. Neither one is great but I would never part with them. Or is it a watch that's design screams some deep fond memory of when I came of age, or of an era in time I think of as iconic? I have some 50s thick lug Omegas and some chunky 60s/70s watches. I like everything that ticks but fell in love with LeCoultre alarms and Futurematics because of their complexity and variations in design which allowed me to collect a variety of styles and went from there. I recently gave my older son a 70s Speedmaster for college graduation and have another for his brother when he graduates in a few years. It is just soooo cool. My first one cost $600 and my second was $500 and the only 2915-3 I had I sold for $4500. Did I mention I have two college age boys? I wish I had a crystal ball just to see what will be collected in 50 years. Heck, I can't wait just to see what cool watches are produced in the next few years.
 
Posts
447
Likes
843
The future classics of tomorrow will be variations of the same icons which have been popular since the last 30 years. Right now the vintage icons of watchmaking are popular since people in common don't need watches they just want to tell a story about a watch. Most of the true iconic watches have a really great story to tell.

Also some of the independents that will get some backing from serious companies (marketing). Think of FP Journe and Chanel. Nowadays people also really like independents because they aren't restricted to any kind of fixed company thoughts and heritage. But the whole issue with independents is will they stand the test of time. That depends a bit on how they will continue to exist. Will they be exclusive or will they become a product with less build quality . Thereby how will their stories continue to be told.

But as said before the Octo Finissimo imho is really great. Other one that's really important is the Lange 1. IWC made some really ground breaking stuff in the 80s which are still easy to catch since they are produced in big numbers. But they are important for the watch industry.

I wrote an article about it more than a year ago. Some is still valid others are so so. https://www.wristicons.com/articles/future-iconic-watches/
 
Posts
478
Likes
489
The future classics of tomorrow will be variations of the same icons which have been popular since the last 30 years
For sure today's classics should still be classics in the future: Daytona, Speedmaster, Royal Oak, Nautilus, Reverso, etc. They're around since decades and still top the most wanted watch list

Now, if we have to add so new watches in the picture, I think the Defy LAB / Inventor / first "affordable" version of it will become classics, as well as the production version of the Parmigiani Senfine concept. I guess the Grand Seiko Snowflake will be one too
 
Posts
2,597
Likes
5,656
Haha, nice try but you'll need to pay the 2049 market price.
Come 2049 you’ll regret saying that... mark my words !
 
Posts
1,806
Likes
3,661
ultimately the classics will remain classic. There's been nothing "new" in watch design other than novel or new materials in the last 50 years.

Except Omega's adoption and bringing to the wider market of Dr George Daniels' Great British invention. The biggest innovation in mechanical watch design in 200 years, and the single best reason for preferring Omega to... well, everybody.
No collector in 50 years time will be taken seriously unless they have a 1990s/2000s Omega co-ax!
 
Posts
1,806
Likes
3,661
The future classics of tomorrow will be variations of the same icons which have been popular since the last 30 years. Right now the vintage icons of watchmaking are popular since people in common don't need watches they just want to tell a story about a watch. Most of the true iconic watches have a really great story to tell.

Also some of the independents that will get some backing from serious companies (marketing). Think of FP Journe and Chanel. Nowadays people also really like independents because they aren't restricted to any kind of fixed company thoughts and heritage. But the whole issue with independents is will they stand the test of time. That depends a bit on how they will continue to exist. Will they be exclusive or will they become a product with less build quality . Thereby how will their stories continue to be told.

But as said before the Octo Finissimo imho is really great. Other one that's really important is the Lange 1. IWC made some really ground breaking stuff in the 80s which are still easy to catch since they are produced in big numbers. But they are important for the watch industry.

I wrote an article about it more than a year ago. Some is still valid others are so so. https://www.wristicons.com/articles/future-iconic-watches/

Thanks for the article, Wouter, enjoyed it. But IMHO FPJ's "Resonance" is the only thing that stands in the same league of horology as the Daniels/Omega co-axial, and so will deserve our grandchildren's respect. That is not to say, if you add together a great story, superb craftspersonship, and great design, it is not classic. So add Lange 1 to the list as well. (Not sure I can ever afford either the FPJ or the ALS1, but hey...) 😗
 
Posts
447
Likes
843
Thanks for the article, Wouter, enjoyed it. But IMHO FPJ's "Resonance" is the only thing that stands in the same league of horology as the Daniels/Omega co-axial, and so will deserve our grandchildren's respect. That is not to say, if you add together a great story, superb craftspersonship, and great design, it is not classic. So add Lange 1 to the list as well. (Not sure I can ever afford either the FPJ or the ALS1, but hey...) 😗

Agree one that from a horological point of view. But the funny thing is that most of the true icons in watchmaking are appreciated due to its design instead of the mechanics. We dorky WIS love the mechanics but I think many collectors and people who like to have 1 or 2 vintage watches buy vintage pieces just cause of the esthetics and the nice story. I have put different kind of watches in the article on purpose. My aim is to have a look a bit further than only sport rolex, apro and pp (nautilus). There are a lot of watches to choose from which are really interesting. It's really difficult to analyse what could be the next thing. If you have a look at some of the watches that have been really popular to collect such as pocket watches and bubble backs, what should be the next big thing? That could be the watches that kids saw theirparents wearing at a sudden point. But it could also be a really rare piece what set a trend. I think Panerai for instance is completely undervaluated at this moment, while it has been the starting point for many. A brand more than a watch, but really a well executed story at that time what succeeded to resonate by a really big audience. And on the other horological hand the first independents of the 1990s and early 2000s. That was some really ground breaking stuff. Really extravagant and over the top, but some of these watches are good examples of that period.
 
Posts
1,806
Likes
3,661
Agree one that from a horological point of view. But the funny thing is that most of the true icons in watchmaking are appreciated due to its design instead of the mechanics. We dorky WIS love the mechanics but I think many collectors and people who like to have 1 or 2 vintage watches buy vintage pieces just cause of the esthetics and the nice story. I have put different kind of watches in the article on purpose. My aim is to have a look a bit further than only sport rolex, apro and pp (nautilus). There are a lot of watches to choose from which are really interesting.
Thanks for that, I really appreciate your taking the time to respond. I completely get where you are coming from, as they say! So it's eyes out here for a really first class independent, and I think my future grandkids can thank me. (And you!)
 
Posts
16,856
Likes
47,859
The future classics of tomorrow will be variations of the same icons which have been popular since the last 30 years. Right now the vintage icons of watchmaking are popular since people in common don't need watches they just want to tell a story about a watch. Most of the true iconic watches have a really great story to tell.

Also some of the independents that will get some backing from serious companies (marketing). Think of FP Journe and Chanel. Nowadays people also really like independents because they aren't restricted to any kind of fixed company thoughts and heritage. But the whole issue with independents is will they stand the test of time. That depends a bit on how they will continue to exist. Will they be exclusive or will they become a product with less build quality . Thereby how will their stories continue to be told.

But as said before the Octo Finissimo imho is really great. Other one that's really important is the Lange 1. IWC made some really ground breaking stuff in the 80s which are still easy to catch since they are produced in big numbers. But they are important for the watch industry.

I wrote an article about it more than a year ago. Some is still valid others are so so. https://www.wristicons.com/articles/future-iconic-watches/

I notice most in the article are quite expensive in today’s $$ and will be even more in the future. A collective upper scale of most collectors here.

Good article nonetheless but above most newer collectors budgets now and in the future.


As I pointed out above with Seiko as the brands prices grow in modern times with a Seiko Diver in the $5k realm now.
Older watches are going to be a value option that usually leads to collections.
It surprises me what some Seikos are now,😲 compared to 5 years ago.
 
Posts
355
Likes
392
There seems to be a huge amount of focus on vintage watches at the moment. In fact almost every new release from some top manufacturers seems to be a "reissue" of a 50s, 60s or 70s watch.

So... my question is which modern watches (released year 2000 onwards) do you think will be sought after by collectors in 20, 30, 40 years or more? Which watches that are readily available now will become "grail watches" for our children and grandchildren?

I'm thinking of any manufacturer, not just Omega, but preferably a model that is newly released since 2000 and is still readily available today.

Rolex Explorer 114270. No doubt in my mind! I kick myself for not having picked one up when they were around 4K.
 
Posts
222
Likes
290
Hey there. I would choose a couple that might make it to the classics of interest file. The Rolex Explorer 2 - probably the polar face. (Although I own the black one)
And perhaps the Apollo 8 DSOTM. That because of novelty in the details of the
Etching. Hmmm...
My son will get my Explorer. Time will tell.
 
Posts
75
Likes
255
Different ways to look at it. if Rolex were to follow a trend towards smaller watches and brought back the 36mm Explorer, then the 39mm would have had a relatively short life. That would make the 39mm the interesting, different watch to have. Although the question about future classics is interesting, I go for watches I like. I just purchased an Oyster Perpetual 36mm and love it. I think it is a future and present classic.
 
Posts
1,806
Likes
3,661
I don't think commemoratives can be classics, much, but there are exceptions. Can't beat the Apollo 13 story - the day analogue saved men's lives when the electronics went down. If they don't still respect that in AD 2059, watches will be the least of our worries. I don't collect chronographs, but if I did you can make mine a Snoopy, I thank you.
 
Posts
2,675
Likes
7,487
First, obviously none of us know, but it's fun to speculate.

Second, we assume the brands that exist today will still exist tomorrow and still at the same perceived level WRT to other brands. Maybe Rolex will buy Omega in the future and make it their sub-brand like Longines/Tissot/Hamilton? Who knows what crazy changes might come in the future...

Third, the most expensive watches today are those where demand is much higher than supply. For some reason there are models well known and desired today that were not so known or desired when they were originally offered. Example: Paul Newman Daytona and 626x series Daytona.

Finally, if I had to pick one model and brand that will be more desired in the future than what will be available based on what's being bought today?

Rolex Explorer II - this was without a doubt my favourite model when I bought it (at a time prior to supply shortages and huge aftermarket premiums). I like the simple and very readable dial, the date and GMT complications, and the subtle silver bezel that slopes away from the crystal making it less ostentatious. I think future demand will increase for this one, and the current supply is low due to it not being as 'hot' as the others.

Because people have to 'wait' for their Rolex subs and GMT's, it creates the appearance of few watches being sold. Yet, I when I travel I subs and GMT's than any other recognizable model. I wouldn't be surprised if the total # of subs and GMT's sold is many multiples of how many Explorer II's they sell. This means total 'supply' in 30-40 years will be much lower, and yet the functionality just as good.


 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,982
I’ve said it in other threads- when I bought my 16750 GMT in 2002, it was $2k for an old Rolex that was out of fashion. Nobody could have predicted what was to come. We still can’t.