What is a "dress watch" today?

Posts
1,811
Likes
3,661
Sort of curious which of my watches might be considered a "dress watch". I would wear any of them with jeans or business casual. With a suit? Perhaps any of them again, but not likely...
1. Lemania rose-gold maual wind
2. Croton Aquamatic
3. Omega Railmaster LE
4. Omega CK 2390 with 30T2
I would consider any of these a dress watch. How about you?

"Dress" watch is not the same as "doing business, wearing a suit" watch. 1 and 4 are the former IMO, and 1, 2, and 4 are the latter. And your Railmaster is a wonderful choice 😎 for "doing business, sleeves rolled up", as well as "non-dress" leisure.
On the gold point, there are ways to do it. If you are a Brit, then you should appreciate the virtues of "shabby chic" (and I mean that as a compliment). Your clients don't resent you, muggers don't target you, and you can still manage to pass quick and easily from jeans to office to dining out (whatever that last one is, I forget). Of course, your 1 and 4 don't have the shabby, but they've got the potential for understated chic - English gent style!
 
Posts
5,082
Likes
15,689
I would consider any of these a dress watch. How about you?
Assuming you mean a dress watch for Vancouver, well, none of these go with yoga pants and flip flops
 
Posts
238
Likes
850
While I have certainly worn sport watches at black tie events, I would not consider those dress watches. If were thinking about which of these constitutes a "dress" watch, I would suggest thinking about which of these would you wear if you were getting married in a suit/tuxedo/morning suit. For me, that would be either the Lemania or the CK 2390 on a leather (or reptile) strap.
 
Posts
8,357
Likes
68,631
My days of dinner jacket legal dinners are long past but if I were to go to one, these are what I’d class as dress watches.



Naturally, if I were in @JwRosenthal’s neck of the woods, I’d have to spend a bit of time deciding which went best with my Ed Hardy T-shirt 😉
 
Posts
16,856
Likes
47,862
1 My Rose Gold Zenith would be my top choice for dress at the moment
2

3

4

5
6

7,8,9,10,11,12 You get the drift....
 
Posts
1,024
Likes
3,996
Today?
catalogshot_m.jpg
 
Posts
338
Likes
581
I'd say 1,2 and 4. Number 3 looks that much more sportier due to its size and presence. All imo.
 
Posts
593
Likes
1,520
I have a Nomos Tangente 38, which I think is a great modern dress watch. Fairly affordable with a nice in house movement. Honestly, think tough to beat if looking for a modern dress watch.
 
Posts
15,256
Likes
44,813
Amongst my regular watch rotation, there isn’t a watch I would not wear on the rare occasion that I dress up. Elsewhere on the MB, there was a discussion recently about other people commenting on the watch you are wearing. The prevailing opinion is that people generally don’t notice the watch you are wearing. In an era of “cheap chic”, I have seen sneakers worn with dress suits. Is there such a thing as a “dress watch”? Not where I live.
 
Posts
1,579
Likes
15,222
Today?
catalogshot_m.jpg
I just threw up in my mouth a little - but you do you.
Yes, I openly admit that in this instant - and I’ll say it’s due to design and aesthetics rather than brand - I’m engaging in a little watch snobbery.
 
Posts
1,579
Likes
15,222
On the topic:

the Lemania and the Omega (not the RM).

I have a 60’s gold Seamaster DeVille I’d wear, and for understated I’d likely wear a Junghans Max Bill in stainless with a silver dial, no date.
 
Posts
1,088
Likes
6,993
If we are following the classic rules of style, "formal," would means something modest in size, plain in colour, simple and unadorned. IMHO, this discounts any tool watch (e.g. a diver), anything with a bezel, and _most_ (but not all) chronographs. Black dials are dressier than white dials (simply b/c black is the standard colour of formal wear), gold is dressier than steel, but steel is still fine. Also, smaller is more formal than larger. Bands also matter, and follow the same rules. A plain, flat black calfskin band without pattern or stitching is the most formal of all, though a steel or steel and gold bracelet is perfectly acceptable with a suit (e.g. a Cartier tank). Following these rules, a Speedie is an informal watch, De Villes are dress watches, Connies and Seamasters can be either (depending on colour, band, and details). Wearing honking big steel chronographs with suits is a transgression of all of these rules, and is akin to showing up at a black tie dinner in a Hummer. The Brits, who are the masters at both formality and understated men's style, would never dream of doing either.

Informal

More formal


Formal
Edited:
 
Posts
9,550
Likes
52,725
Dress watch:

Not a dress watch:

I enjoy wearing them both.
As for which of the OP’s watches are dress pieces by today’s standards (which I don’t entirely agree with), 1 and 4, yes; 2, borderline; 3, no.
Edited:
 
Posts
9,550
Likes
52,725
I make a distinction between a “dress” watch (which I associate with formal occasions and attire) and a “business” watch. Here’s my 1964 Constellation. I do not consider it to be a dress watch because of the stainless steel case and BOR bracelet, but I wouldn’t hesitate to wear it with a suit.
 
Posts
1,579
Likes
15,222
Dress watch, but I’d swap the strap for a flatter, black or brown lizard strap.

not a dress watch: