What do you think about this Constellation pie pan 168005, cal 564 on ebay

Posts
2,876
Likes
1,962
So for the non expert: whst does the missing onyx tell me?
It's the economized version of onyx, just like 14k is economized of 18k. 😉
 
Posts
469
Likes
1,956
It's the economized version of onyx, just like 14k is economized of 18k. 😉

Yeah, and who wants to be seen with something like that on their wrist !
 
Posts
1,061
Likes
1,940
Am I the only one here who finds it rather pricey? No-one seems to be saying it out loud....
 
Posts
6,306
Likes
9,743
It’s a good looking watch but as others have said significantly overpriced IMHO.
.
Am I the only one here who finds it rather pricey? No-one seems to be saying it out loud....

Was that not loud enough ?😉
 
Posts
3,742
Likes
6,360
24 mil is the turning point.
Lots of 561's was swapped by 564's from cheaper C cases with high serial #.
 
Posts
6,306
Likes
9,743
24 mil is the turning point.

I think I asked for clarification of '24mil' before and it was concluded that onyx inserts (at least) appeared throughout the 24 millions.

which is why I was surprised that the OPs 24,xxx, 14k, Connie had painted inserts

However, if there was a transition phase from onyx to paint through the 24Ms (as @bart thought you had suggested) that would explain it

I guess that an equally plausible explanation would be that (given we don't know the serial no. other than 24m) the movt sat in a box for a while and was paired with a 'new' sans-onyx dial.
 
Posts
9,596
Likes
27,705
24 mil is the turning point.
Lots of 561's was swapped by 564's from cheaper C cases with high serial #.

Funny how three C-cased 564 within 70 serial numbers found their way into this sort of conversion in the case I describe... 😉
 
Posts
3,742
Likes
6,360
Funny how three C-cased 564 within 70 serial numbers found their way into this sort of conversion in the case I describe... 😉
Like I said.
They were from cheaper C cases. The guys preferred 564's to 561's.
That is why I never buy 168.005 black onyx inserts powered by a late 564 (25 mil up).
 
Posts
9,596
Likes
27,705
Like I said.
They were from cheaper C cases. The guys preferred 564's to 561's.
That is why I never buy 168.005 black onyx inserts powered by a late 564 (25 mil up).

So... Three C-cased calibers 564s within 70 numbers of each other? All transplanted into yellow gold cap Constellations of the same reference? A lot of coincidences.

That's not to say that you couldn't be right - I certainly flag late serial Constellations w/ onyx inserts too, but only as a marker of something possibly being awry, not anything definitive.
 
Posts
41
Likes
27
I think I asked for clarification of '24mil' before and it was concluded that onyx inserts (at least) appeared throughout the 24 millions.

which is why I was surprised that the OPs 24,xxx, 14k, Connie had painted inserts

However, if there was a transition phase from onyx to paint through the 24Ms (as @bart thought you had suggested) that would explain it

I guess that an equally plausible explanation would be that (given we don't know the serial no. other than 24m) the movt sat in a box for a while and was paired with a 'new' sans-onyx dial.
According to the dealer the serial number is 24433114
 
Posts
6,306
Likes
9,743
According to the dealer the serial number is 24433114
It’s a tough call.
As per the comments above, there is nothing to prove/disprove that the watch is all correct.
However, the watch is significantly over priced as whilst the dial is very good, the case is only ‘nice’ as it has seen some polishing.
I would expect an absolutely mint 14k version to be sub 3000euro and this example to be sub 2,500.
 
Posts
3,742
Likes
6,360
It’s a tough call.
As per the comments above, there is nothing to prove/disprove that the watch is all correct

I would say it is original and correct.
 
Posts
41
Likes
27
I promised to tell what happened: Nothing. I tried to contact the dealer to check how much he could reduce the price. No reply. Now the watch has disappeared from eBay. But again thanks for the support.