What do you think about this 1966 Seamaster CAL:552

R

Posts

5

Likes

0

rlamkh

·Nov 30, 2018

https://www.ebay.com/itm/232923144353?ul_noapp=true

Any comments appreciated. If it is a good one, I would consider it and start negotiating.

thanks.

 

This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.

R

Posts

5

Likes

0

rlamkh

·Nov 30, 2018

just found out it is a redial, I think we could close the discussion. Nevertheless, may I have your advice how I could identify this watch as a redial?

 

Posts

4,963

Likes

18,397

Shabbaz

·Nov 30, 2018

I dont see a watch. Pictures please

 

Posts

1,921

Likes

2,658

Passover

·Nov 30, 2018

Hi,
take the reference number 166.067 (on the inner case back), google it https://tinyurl.com/y8zfe9o3 and compare the details. Most obvious on this one: Font of "Seamaster"

 

Posts

21,734

Likes

49,319

Dan S

·Nov 30, 2018

R rlamkh

just found out it is a redial, I think we could close the discussion. Nevertheless, may I have your advice how I could identify this watch as a redial?

What makes you think it is a redial? [Edit: Sorry, I didn't realize the auction had ended and got fooled by eBay.]

[Incorrect photo deleted.]

Edited: Nov 30, 2018

 

Posts

13,441

Likes

31,612

X350 XJR

·Nov 30, 2018·Vintage Omega Aficionado

The one they paid over $1000 for.

 

Posts

1,921

Likes

2,658

Passover

·Nov 30, 2018

This was the initial listing. Seller had stated in his description that it is a redial.

 

R

Posts

5

Likes

0

rlamkh

·Nov 30, 2018

seems like the watch was sold after my post, the initial watch was the one posted by X350XJR, REF165.005

 

Posts

1,921

Likes

2,658

Passover

·Dec 1, 2018

Sorry if I commented on the wrong watch 😉