I think “flipper” implies buying low with the intention of selling for a profit. Same term is used in real estate- buy it cheap, do the bare minimum to make it salable to maximize profit, sell at top market price. The ethical problem with this is that it keeps the decent values out of the hands of those who wish to put in the sweat equity and live in a house that is within their means- it drives the market rates up and prices out those who can only afford the bargains. Same goes with watches.
Some are happy to buy a flipped house, the work has already been done (albeit at the bare minimum of quality usually) and they get a move-in ready house. Again, same can be said for watch flippers who buy a rough and non working watch with the intention of cleaning it up and selling it at a profit to someone who doesn’t want to deal with the hassle of servicing etc. Is it wrong, no- it’s all a matter of perspective.
We have well known members here who buy watches on European auction sites cheaply, then sell them on this site for profit. Nothing wrong with that- but if you know what they paid versus what they are selling it for, you may get turned off thinking they are simply a profiteer. But that OF “flipper” may just be trying to build up enough equity to buy something very special and the only way they can do that is nickel by nickel- we don’t know their motivations.
We all want to buy low and sell high, it’s the goal of any collector who buys/sells/trades. If nobody gets screwed in the deal, I see nothing wrong with it. If you feel you are being screwed, back out. If you feel you have been screwed, don’t do business with them again.
Click to expand...