- Posts
- 10
- Likes
- 13
Borbor
路this thread should be mandatory reading by anyone who is thinking about buying a vintage watch.
very educational.
and orchi's ig. lol, pure gold.
very educational.
and orchi's ig. lol, pure gold.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
On a somewhat different note, but in the same paradigm 馃槻
Before you chastise me for posting: I assume this is a commonly known place for crooks, because the URL is desperately easy to find... True sharks would know already about it anyway. I read about the company on another watch forum, in a post from a while ago. I'm surprised Rolex doesn't do anything about it 馃槙 Mods feel free to delete if off-policy.
(the rest of the website is pretty enlightening, too 馃槖 what's crazy is, it's all "in the open")
On a somewhat different note, but in the same paradigm 馃槻
http://www.yukiwatch.com/catalog/item/9060661/10345806.htm
Before you chastise me for posting: I assume this is a commonly known place for crooks, because the URL is desperately easy to find... True sharks would know already about it anyway. I read about the company on another watch forum, in a post from a while ago. I'm surprised Rolex doesn't do anything about it 馃槙 Mods feel free to delete if off-policy.
(the rest of the website is pretty enlightening, too 馃槖 what's crazy is, it's all "in the open")

https://www.chrono24.fr/rolex/1978-gmt-master-1675--id8385101.htm
All of these watches were originally hand finished so they all look slightly different. The thickness of the chamfers also changed over the years, compare the chamfers of a 1675 with those of a 16750. The crown guards were also different.
Unpolished 1675:
16750, thinner chamfer. And look at the line on the crown guard:
On a somewhat different note, but in the same paradigm 馃槻
http://www.yukiwatch.com/catalog/item/9060661/10345806.htm
Before you chastise me for posting: I assume this is a commonly known place for crooks, because the URL is desperately easy to find... True sharks would know already about it anyway. I read about the company on another watch forum, in a post from a while ago. I'm surprised Rolex doesn't do anything about it 馃槙 Mods feel free to delete if off-policy.
(the rest of the website is pretty enlightening, too 馃槖 what's crazy is, it's all "in the open")
My polished 1675...a recut would do wonders, but I am holding off.
I'm perfectly happy with a nice, honest, period correct GMT. Not going to go crazy and on a foolish hunt to find an 'unpolished' watch, I buy what I like and enjoy wearing it. None of these watches are going to be perfect after 30-40 years of use, which is what's most attractive to me. Would I enjoy a NOS 1675? Probably a cool watch to own, but not one to wear, so where is the enjoyment in that? I have NOS watches in my collection, they are an enigma, a test in ones will power.
This GMT brings me the most pleasure to wear on weekends. It's an honest '72, MK2 and most notably, its been POLISHED....which doesn't bother me one bit.
I have a 71 1675 in the same condition, just over polilshed.
I try to ignore it but it niggles, I bought it from the original owner so that helps my concern.
I think to rectify this case would be prohibitive $ wise?
I have a 71 1675 in the same condition, just over polilshed.
I try to ignore it but it niggles, I bought it from the original owner so that helps my concern.
I think to rectify this case would be prohibitive $ wise?
My dad and grandfather had matching 1675s ('65, 66). My dad wore his for 30 years. Serviced by Rolex a couple times...and has only minimal and soft chamfers. The other one sat in a box from 1974 when my grandfather passed until the late '90s when I began to wear it. RSC serviced it then. Really has no chamfers, but is sharp from the RSC finish.
It seems like many of these refinishes make the chamfers larger than they ever were to meet the market demand. I know mine are honest at least.