but the price is different between the sweep second and sub second with same caliber in 1946....sorry i was not born !!

 

This is vintage-ish I suppose, as it's getting close to 20 years old and it's an interesting take on the triple-date, moonphase chronograph. The movement is a Breitling Cal.19 which is comprised of an ETA 2824 to provide power supply, with everything else provided by a custom module made by Dubois-Depraz. The triple date complication is a four-year calendar.

 

I should really change the crystal though...

 

It's a little shy.

 

Wow, that's a very fine specimen!

I'd like to 'Dibs' it, but I fear it may be futile...

DIBS anyway, please!

 

My 14k UG triple, date, moonphase. Look at those deco arabic numerals !

 

Font reminds me of my UG.

 

I have never seen any three hand UG in that NOS condition !!!

 

redibsed for emphasis

 

Please put me next in line... Dibs!
Dang, MP, that's two of your watches in the same thread...

 

MP, What size is this?

 

35mm, excluding crown.

 

Whats the story, It had to have been in a shoe box for 50 years or something ?

 

Unfortunately, all I know is that it came from an "estate".

 

Amazing. Obviously yours is in much nicer condition, but I see a lot of similarities in the dial with mine. Even though mine is at least 37mm.

It looks to me like Omega used the SAME Moonphase/Calendar discs for both the 35mm and 37mm case sizes, so that proportionately, they look bigger in the smaller case sizes.

 

It's not surprising. The same can be said for Universal Geneve Tri-Compax's and triple calendar moonphase's. And also Jaeger Lecoultre triple calendar moonphases. In fact - it probably is true for nearly every vintage moonphase manufacturer.

 

Same watch, more clear pic

 

VERY Sharp!