vujen
·The square one is 100% redialed. By the way that seller only has redialed watches at crazy prices! 😁
I think it’s a redial (or partial redial) because IMHO this particular dial should look like this (including the “Contax”) sign - see image below. Because this is actually a Contax cal. 285 movement. I am particularly suspicious about the subdials font and printing and relationship to the other scales on the dial.
Cheap Polerouter Super, seems legit to me.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-Un...h-/304840909838?&_trksid=p2056016.m2518.l4276
Interesting early compur (with intruiging '5' which IMHO indicates a number in a batch) https://www.instagram.com/p/CpnOIYot-Yk/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
I really like this Compur. I don't know the seller, but he has a bunch of nice UG's on his Instagram. He's asking 3390 € for this piece. I'm quite new in the UG world. Are any of the senior members willing to share thoughts on condition/rarity in relation to the asking price? Or is this subject to a seperate thread?
I was also intrigued by the "5" on the inside caseback. The seller's reply: "True piece of art, impossible to find nowadays.
Made in 1936s’ from the goldsmith cashier (5) 'Croittier'."
Perhaps ask him for a sharp picture of the dial. The IG post is not really useful for assessing the dial (however it seems to be original)
There are 2 5's in the caseback. The upper one is indeed the casemaker. My remark was about the lower one. I think this number indicates something about the number in a batch. See also: https://omegaforums.net/threads/universal-genève-four-digit-references.152589/page-2#post-2093813
I'm a total noob, but seems like the wrong reference number on the caseback, at least from looking at this site?
https://universalgenevepolerouter.com/galleries/869112-polerouter-super/
I find this one quite interesting.
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/385481885491
Not the watch per se but the fact that the case has MADE IN U.K. inscribed in the caseback which is the first time I've spotted this for a UG.
The maker (RCK) is Roy Cecil King according to this link.
https://www.silvermakersmarks.co.uk/Makers/London-RA-RD.html
Given that they mention a date of death (2000, age 78) it suggests that Roy was a one-man band. One imagine he must have been quite the artisan if he was on the radar of a Swiss manufacture.
Anybody feeling brave enough to interpret the assay marks?
That is almost a spitting image of mine ! however, there are differences (fond and so on). The plexi does not do it any favours. I love those dials though. Looks like someone snapped it up as it's gone. I could have lived with some damage to dial. Let's face it, it is an 80 year old piece of art and with a new plexi and an original calendar hand a bit of a clean, it would look a thousand times better!