Universal Geneve Watches On Ebay

Posts
5,793
Likes
8,992
Interesting one: reference 20509 both inside and outside (although I'm not 100% convinced of the outside one) https://www.ebay.fr/itm/275725737542

 
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
Posts
1,384
Likes
2,930

It looks like a pre 40s compax and i like it ... It would not take a lot to get it going. I dont think the dial is broken. Looks more like some sort of mod or may have been dropped and bent/damaged. From what i can see, you could probably straighten it and once in the case, you would hardly notice it. What you need is a side shot ! It would make a very nice period UG if you could find a case (that would be a miracle).
 
Posts
5,793
Likes
8,992
Interesting. Think you are right
 
Posts
962
Likes
3,630
These dial are usually cut, it's ok. This is reprinted tho.
 
Posts
1,384
Likes
2,930
These dial are usually cut, it's ok. This is reprinted tho.

what makes you think it is a redial ?
 
Posts
159
Likes
398
These dial are usually cut, it's ok. This is reprinted tho.

I agree. Cutout is normal in these earlier dials, it enables its removal. And I too think it’s a redial.
 
Posts
1,384
Likes
2,930
Why do you think it is a redial ? It is an early dial but from what I see, it is in line with style and quality and character of early dials. imperfections are common. Here is a 22209 and shows similar traits ...

20180913_091629-jpg.1009272
 
Posts
159
Likes
398
Why do you think it is a redial ? It is an early dial but from what I see, it is in line with style and quality and character of early dials. imperfections are common. Here is a 22209 and shows similar traits ...


I think it’s a redial (or partial redial) because IMHO this particular dial should look like this (including the “Contax”) sign - see image below. Because this is actually a Contax cal. 285 movement. I am particularly suspicious about the subdials font and printing and relationship to the other scales on the dial.

 
Posts
5,793
Likes
8,992
Agreed but these 5's are really weird.

Edited:
 
Posts
159
Likes
398
Agreed but these 5's are really weird.


I have the exact same feeling. Strange font choice for the minute numerals. Also, the position and relationship of minute track and subdials is rather unusual. Furthermore, I would think that with this serial there shouldn’t be “Swiss” on the dial…
But who knows - the photo is not very sharp…
Edited: