Universal Geneve Watches On Ebay

Posts
6,713
Likes
18,564
someone bit.
 
Posts
4,402
Likes
5,797
The tachymetre looks good to me. There is another for sale down in New Zealand. I have no connection to the seller and this is his picture.

Ref 181102 is a very rare bird indeed. I could neither afford nor wear one of these but what a glorious way to sign off the 60s Tri Compax.

Gonna git me one o these, sum day LoL.....at £32,518 👎 gotta rethink our Boston seller ?

Rare birds tho...has anyone seen these for sale anytime this year?
 
Posts
159
Likes
195
refinished (look at the subdials) and index at 11 is going away....
 
Posts
3,269
Likes
7,752
Oku Oku
Why do you think so?
Would also be nice if you insert pics here.

nothing immediately jumps out at me.
 
Posts
1,933
Likes
3,531
Oku Oku
Why do you think so?
Would also be nice if you insert pics here.

A couple of things I was curious about since I’m still trying to nail down what is and what isn’t. First thing was the day sundial. The numbers are close to the edge and then start drifting away at 5-7. The TR and PAX drift from subdial. The date subdial looks off centered. It doesn’t touch both Day and Month windows and the raised hour markers at 11 and 1 don’t look right. No offense I’m just asking to see if I’m right
 
Posts
13,055
Likes
52,027
A couple of things I was curious about since I’m still trying to nail down what is and what isn’t. First thing was the day sundial. The numbers are close to the edge and then start drifting away at 5-7. The TR and PAX drift from subdial. The date subdial looks off centered. It doesn’t touch both Day and Month windows and the raised hour markers at 11 and 1 don’t look right. No offense I’m just asking to see if I’m right
My 22297-2 for comparison. This EWC watch is fine. And rare.
 
Posts
1,933
Likes
3,531
My 22297-2 for comparison. This EWC watch is fine. And rare.

I like yours better. Nice creamy dial. One day I’ll get one
 
Posts
1,167
Likes
4,181
First thing was the day sundial. The numbers are close to the edge and then start drifting away at 5-7. The TR and PAX drift from subdial.
Agreed. it is minimal off center. But if you have a look at how fine the printing is there is hardly a doubt. Look at the small serifs. If a redial (what I don't think), it is an old one and near perfect.

The date subdial looks off centered. It doesn’t touch both Day and Month windows and the raised hour markers at 11 and 1 don’t look right.
That is not a printing problem but a "problem" of the dial.

No offense I’m just asking to see if I’m right
No problem. I was just asking where you see the problems. For learning purposes, it is better you say it first.
 
Posts
1,933
Likes
3,531
Oku Oku
Agreed. it is minimal off center. But if you have a look at how fine the printing is there is hardly a doubt. Look at the small serifs. If a redial (what I don't think), it is an old one and near perfect.


That is not a printing problem but a "problem" of the dial.


No problem. I was just asking where you see the problems. For learning purposes, it is better you say it first.

What about the raised hour marker not touching the subdial?
 
Posts
970
Likes
3,025
A couple of things I was curious about since I’m still trying to nail down what is and what isn’t. First thing was the day sundial. The numbers are close to the edge and then start drifting away at 5-7. The TR and PAX drift from subdial. The date subdial looks off centered. It doesn’t touch both Day and Month windows and the raised hour markers at 11 and 1 don’t look right. No offense I’m just asking to see if I’m right
This dial is perfectly original and fine 👍