Time Capsule

Posts
12,778
Likes
17,350
Maybe there were a few test/sample kit configurations?
Oh, I get it. A prototype? 馃槣馃榿
gatorcpa
 
Posts
2,876
Likes
1,957
I can find many examples of centre seconds watches from the early 1940's & even 1930's (Omega Medicus) Rolex Oyster/Athlete, Longines Weems etc etc
It's the *direct* centre second of the ETA 2408 that is different from those watches. The direct centre second was invented by IWC in 1948.

late 30's early 40's date windows & slightly similar dial layouts Movada's & Zenith watches ..
I'm not so sure. Can you post some pictures of similar dials from the 40s or 50s?

so unless ETA copied a revolutionary Milus movement it must be post war
It's very unlikely a new and small watch company could be so revolutionary but no one has heard about.
Maybe there were a few test/sample kit configurations?
But with the same "control number"? Afaik, only fake watches have the same ID numbers...
 
Posts
92
Likes
128
Oh, I get it. A prototype? 馃槣馃榿
gatorcpa
From that link earlier, that same kit seems to have been put together twice. http://www.coloradoprospector.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=391
I have never linked to this kit, I've seen it before, I think there are two different stories on-line about it using the same picture, it's obviously a Atlantic sized box so unless the box was adapted by the DoD to take all the contents (test/sample kit maybe?) or by someone else it obv. doesn't fit the norm!

Regards
Mr.H
 
Posts
888
Likes
2,989
Just wanted to add to this interesting conversation. Here is a reply l received from Milus some time ago:

Hello,

This model 40.81 was produced by a company that no longer exists since 1999.
We have unfortunately no information and the former owners all passed away.
When the factory was closed the removal company accidently destroyed filing cabinets full of memorabilia and everything went into smoke.

Best regards
MARIA MARCASSA

MILUS INTERNATIONAL SA
Rte de Reuchenette 19
CH - 2502 Biel-Bienne

So as previously noted, apparently no records exist. And any connection the current Milus has to the original is basically in name only. I own this Milus reference; as already noted, extremely unlikely from the 40's. It's actually a cool little watch, about 36mm, and I like it for what it is.
 
Posts
2,876
Likes
1,957
Just wanted to add to this interesting conversation. Here is a reply l received from Milus some time ago:

Hello,

This model 40.81 was produced by a company that no longer exists since 1999.
We have unfortunately no information and the former owners all passed away.
When the factory was closed the removal company accidently destroyed filing cabinets full of memorabilia and everything went into smoke.

Best regards
MARIA MARCASSA

MILUS INTERNATIONAL SA
Rte de Reuchenette 19
CH - 2502 Biel-Bienne

So as previously noted, apparently no records exist. And any connection the current Milus has to the original is basically in name only. I own this Milus reference; as already noted, extremely unlikely from the 40's. It's actually a cool little watch, about 36mm, and I like it for what it is.
So this proves Mr. Vargas's statement that Milus verified his watches was not true.

Can you post some internal pictures of your watch?
 
Posts
92
Likes
128
It's the *direct* centre second of the ETA 2408 that is different from those watches. The direct centre second was invented by IWC in 1948.
Interesting but I cannot find a reference to this?

I'm not so sure. Can you post some pictures of similar dials from the 40s or 50s?


Vintage triple date watches are easy to find on-line, then of course there is the 1945 DateJust

It's very unlikely a new and small watch company could be so revolutionary but no one has heard about.
Probably yes

But with the same "control number"? Afaik, only fake watches have the same ID numbers...
Its the same set I think pictured both times, if you look at the nicks/scratches etc they're the same -- 814 is a made up kit/story I think .. or faintly possible a DoD sample kit

Regards
Mr.H
 
Posts
888
Likes
2,989
So this proves Mr. Vargas's statement that Milus verified his watches was not true.

Can you post some internal pictures of your watch?

I've never had the caseback off, but I'll see if I can remove it tomorrow. Just all the stylistic cues always said circa '60 to me
 
Posts
12,778
Likes
17,350
I've never had the caseback off, but I'll see if I can remove it tomorrow. Just all the stylistic cues always said circa '60 to me
Please let us know if your watch has a serial number, either on the movement or case. It might be between the lugs like a Rolex.

Thanks,
gatorcpa
 
Posts
2,876
Likes
1,957
Interesting but I cannot find a reference to this?
I mis-typed the company - it's actually Zenith with the 133 movement in 1948. http://www.timezone.com/2002/09/24/the-pursuit-of-center-seconds-part-2/
259167-33ab17ee7dfe62416b4a7dd85df1f974.jpg

Vintage triple date watches are easy to find on-line, then of course there is the 1945 DateJust
That dial is very different in style to your watch. Hands, numeral and arrow markers, and surface finish are all different. They are certainly a decade or more different.
 
Posts
888
Likes
2,989
Please let us know if your watch has a serial number, either on the movement or case. It might be between the lugs like a Rolex.

Thanks,
gatorcpa

Definitely not marked with a serial number on the outer case. I'll see if I can verify if the movement is marked.
 
Posts
2,510
Likes
3,729
I think if we apply Occam's Razor to this we all know the answer - either we have the most technically advanced wrist watch in the world produced in small quantities and sold only to the government in 1941 that had features and a movement not seen for another 20 years, or we have a mistaken historian and the watch has common features from the 1960s. I know which I believe to be the case.

I'm debating the kindest way I can reply to Mr. Vargas, or if I should at all. While there is the (not so great) part of me that LOVES to correct people when they are unequivocally wrong, this isn't a particularly admirable trait. It is evident that he has built at least a part of his reputation on these kits and it is completely understandable that he may want to double down when confronted with evidence that changes his world view. I care only in that I like factual and complete information and it bugs the crap out of me when people repeat hearsay as truth. But in the overall scheme of things, what does it matter?
 
Posts
92
Likes
128
Milus Jet-Master .. Looks like it kind of kills off the last hope of the Snow-Star even coming close to the date needed

Very strange that a company that now sells $250k time pieces didn't work that out ... Well they certainly ran with it, I think the 2000 limited edition Snow-Star Heritage kits netted them close to $9m in just 2 years. Slight loss for me as I know a pair Atlantic/Pacific Barter kits advertised as WWII sold for $15,800 recently


Regards
Mr.H
Edited:
 
Posts
2,876
Likes
1,957
Slight loss for me as I know a pair Atlantic/Pacific Barter kits sold for $15,800 recently
The value is in the whole kit, which I think is definitely legitimate, not in the watch's date of manufacture.
 
Posts
92
Likes
128
Ok after a little further research & speaking to a few collectors in this field all roads lead to WWII issue, so it looks like these kits can be firmly placed within the 1941-42 time-frame

http://www.anaspides.net/military/survival_chits_and_maps.html

Will pick up a copy of "THE LAST HOPE The Blood Chit Story in hopes of the original watch being pictured

Rgards
Mr.H
Edited:
 
Posts
693
Likes
705
Any clues in the shock protection? My best guess is Novochoc B (old version maybe). There are a couple others I found that are roughly triangular.

Not that I've found much info for dating that, but all other photos of 2408s that I've seen appear to use Incabloc. Hopefully we'll have another example to compare.

 
Posts
2,876
Likes
1,957
Any clues in the shock protection? My best guess is Novochoc B (old version maybe). There are a couple others I found that are roughly triangular.

Not that I've found much info for dating that, but all other photos of 2408s that I've seen appear to use Incabloc. Hopefully we'll have another example to compare.

The shock system can be custom ordered with ETA. I've seen the Novochoc mostly on lower tier brands. I guess this was chosen so it could be called Milushoc, whereas Incabloc costs more and cannot be called differently. Both types exist in vintage Milus watches.
 
Posts
888
Likes
2,989
So this proves Mr. Vargas's statement that Milus verified his watches was not true.

Can you post some internal pictures of your watch?

Here's a couple of pics of the eta 2472 housed inside
 
Posts
9,595
Likes
27,672
Ok after a little further research & speaking to a few collectors in this field all roads lead to WWII issue, so it looks like these kits can be firmly placed within the 1941-42 time-frame

I'm curious as to what these collectors think of the watch included. Hopefully no-one still believes these are WWII items?