Stainless steel crown for reference 2759 cal. 420 see picture..

Posts
778
Likes
2,442
I don't know the correct design,and have a golden one, so fare 🤦
Edited:
 
Posts
16,633
Likes
34,929
Unfortunately if the crown fits caliber 500X it does not fit for caliber 420 !?🙁
 
Posts
3,222
Likes
12,675
Unfortunately if the crown fits caliber 500X it does not fit for caliber 420 !?🙁

Damn, different tap size? Must’ve forgotten about that, I thought they were interchangeable.
 
Posts
342
Likes
515
MtV MtV
https://omegaforums.net/threads/ome...ommon-case-reference.4421/page-4#post-2016487

I’m not 100% sure it’s the same, it looks just a tiny bit slimmer, but maybe @iamvr would be interested in a trade. 😀 Let me know if you need measurements, I have a spare RG example I could check for dimensions.
I think I may have one from a stash of NOS parts I bought, but there is no part number on the sachet. Would you mind posting dimensions and I'll check if mine corresponds.
 
Posts
342
Likes
515
Ok, @tamura, I may have the correct crown. A quick measure with my metal non-digital callipers last night (not pressing firmly so as not to mark the crown) gave me a diameter of 5.6mm and thickness of 2.7mm) so within the margin of error. I have a bunch of Omega stems so I'll find one that fits and then measure to determine the tap.
 
Posts
16,633
Likes
34,929
I think tap 12 is too big.

Ofrei shows it as a tap 7.



The tap 12 crown is for a 2639 caliber 265.

 
Posts
16,633
Likes
34,929
Although Cousins UK list the crown for ref 2759 as 45003ST (original Omega specs).
Gets a bit confusing doesn't it.

 
Posts
16,633
Likes
34,929
The 06945004ST is also a tap 12 and close enough to not matter.

 
Posts
342
Likes
515
The tap 12/ tap 7 discrepancy is easy to explain. Tap 7 equals 1.2mm for Jules Borel/Esslinger etc. Cousins has an alternative way of expressing this. When they say tap 12 they mean 1.2mm. Cousins is easier for the layman, but it is perhaps not consistent with other parts of the industry.