- Posts
- 886
- Likes
- 471
Duckie
·Enjoying the responses. It has been a bit of a disappointment. It always makes me laugh when people reference the toughness of their Speedmaster with the “my watch has been to the moon” thing. It may have gone to the moon but god only knows what happened at splashdown.
Would seem ol Speedy is more of a show queen than a workhorse.
You probably need to review the full suite of tests the watch passed back in the day where no other contenders got through to the end.
Keep in mind the assumption is made that any test is with a watch in top condition.
The guidelines across the industry are fairly clear but conservative for good reason.
50 m is really only good for swimming.
Omega used to make this recommendation themselves on their chart.
Also remember that NASA owned the watches and assumed full responsibility for maintenance and servicing in-house.
After splashdown the watches were not expected to go swimming anyway but some very limited imersion or splashing of water was no doubt expected.
But for all intents and purposes any moon mission was fraught with extreme risk and at any time it could've been a one way mission for the watches anyway.
They just had to be fit for purpose until re-entry. After that who would care less?
IMO, the moon watch is no show queen but it certainly deserves all due respect as an example of a type that had it's origins as it stands in the 50's and remains a benchmark of it's type to this day.
