So… should I swap the hands on this new Seamaster?

Posts
141
Likes
132
Hey all - long story short, took my watch to a service centre for an unrelated repair and they dinged the hour hand. See below pics. They apologized and offered to replace the hands with a new set. Are there any downsides to doing this? (My thinking is it’s not vintage and I should go ahead, but thought to ask you fine people beforehand. Thanks!)

 
Posts
5,265
Likes
24,291
Doesn't really matter, either take them up on their offer now, they will be swapped anyway at the next service.
 
Posts
505
Likes
2,256
If it's going to bother you every time you wear the watch, I think you should have them change it.
 
Posts
2,533
Likes
3,393
I’m surprised they even asked. They should have just replaced them so that you never knew. There’s absolutely no reason not to get replacement hands — they are identical to the one that are on there now.
 
Posts
625
Likes
598
I’m surprised they even asked. They should have just replaced them so that you never knew. There’s absolutely no reason not to get replacement hands — they are identical to the one that are on there now.

I strongly disagree. No parts like this should ever be replaced without the owner knowing ahead of time.
 
Posts
3,128
Likes
6,162
I strongly disagree. No parts like this should ever be replaced without the owner knowing ahead of time.

My understanding is that it is omega's standard procedure to replace high polish hands with every service for exactly the reason the original poster came here: it's almost impossible not to scratch the high polish. I understand this may not be the standard procedure for an independent watchmaker as it adds additional cost.

I do agree with you that on a vintage piece where the (no longer) luminous material has patina'd in a particular fashion, NOT replacing the hands should be the norm. But here it really does not matter- new hands with modern lume will be identical.
Edited:
 
Posts
625
Likes
598
My understanding is that it is omega's standard procedure to replace high polish hands with every service for exactly the reason the original poster came here: it's almost impossible not to scratch the high polish. I understand this may not be the standard procedure for an independent watchmaker as it adds additional cost.

I do agree with you that on a vintage piece where the (no longer) luminous material has patina'd in a particular fashion, NOT replacing the hands should be the norm. But here it really does not matter- new hands with modern lume will be identical.

I get that hands are normally replaced with an Omega service. In fact, I just had a GoldenEye 2541.80 come back from service that had the hands replaced. But you are informed ahead of time that will happen, before you pay for the service and before the work is done. If you want to object you can. I agree that in most cases people will not object to replacing the hands on a modern Omega. But they should be informed beforehand.
 
Posts
141
Likes
132
UPDATE: just got it back from the Swatch Service Centre. They did a phenomenal job and quick turnaround. Happy camper.

 
Posts
1,053
Likes
3,002
UPDATE: just got it back from the Swatch Service Centre. They did a phenomenal job and quick turnaround. Happy camper.

Looks good. How did you get it back that fast? Is it next door? Because any service usually takes a minimum of two months.
 
Posts
141
Likes
132
Looks good. How did you get it back that fast? Is it next door? Because any service usually takes a minimum of two months.
The Swatch Service Centre in Toronto never disappoints.
 
Posts
2
Likes
2
UPDATE: just got it back from the Swatch Service Centre. They did a phenomenal job and quick turnaround. Happy camper.

Great job from them...looks great
 
Posts
141
Likes
132
Great job from them...looks great
They really did do a great job. The customer service interaction was stellar too (always is).