ConElPueblo
·I thought this discussion warrented its own thread, I hope that @Engee and @dsio don't mind me quoting their posts for starting the debate.
I have yet to see a convincing case for saying that single or double Ts are anything but a stylistic choice. Perhaps it has to do with the total amount of tritium?
Besides some (seemingly) special order Seamasters from the fifties and a single odd-ball seventies chronograph, I haven't seen any Omegas that have lume only on the hands and not the dial.
While I can easily see that lume on the hands would be enough to give some amount of low light practicality for the user, I cannot see that there would be any demand for a watch that had only some lume instead of the full practicability.
Have anyone seen production Omegas with only hand lume?
That's my grail watch. Problem is they don't look like they will send it to the UK.
As a matter of interest, my understanding is one "T" after Swiss Made means Tritium hands, not hour markers, and I see no lume plots around the edge, but I do see that the hour markers have cut outs which would appear to be for lume. Is that correct?
Yea I assumed that based on some devilles that it seemed to fit for regarding the single T but it isn’t the case
I have yet to see a convincing case for saying that single or double Ts are anything but a stylistic choice. Perhaps it has to do with the total amount of tritium?
Besides some (seemingly) special order Seamasters from the fifties and a single odd-ball seventies chronograph, I haven't seen any Omegas that have lume only on the hands and not the dial.
While I can easily see that lume on the hands would be enough to give some amount of low light practicality for the user, I cannot see that there would be any demand for a watch that had only some lume instead of the full practicability.
Have anyone seen production Omegas with only hand lume?

