Forums Latest Members
  1. MauricioNO Feb 16, 2020

    Posts
    46
    Likes
    42
    I have no practical experience with any of the movements in question, but there is no denying the 3861 is the most technological out of the bunch, and I my train of thought here is if I am still in the market for one, I might as well wait for the newest version. Bear in mind I have no intention to ever selling this in the future, so it doesn't matter to me how closely related this one will be to the moon landing or the history of its older brothers.

    That being said, I am sure I would be very happy having an 1861 as well, and if the 3861 takes more than a year or two to come by, that's probably what I'll end up buying.
     
  2. Omegafanman Feb 16, 2020

    Posts
    4,564
    Likes
    17,105
    Yes at least one 861 did orbit the moon and the only up close film of a Speedmaster running in space in an Apollo command module is an 861 movement watch.
     
    Edited Feb 16, 2020
  3. Omegafanman Feb 16, 2020

    Posts
    4,564
    Likes
    17,105
    I have never been that hung up on the Moonwatch tag. If we had not made it out of orbit I bet the Ed White would still generate a lot of interest from the EVA. I am very interested in how the Speedmaster became officially sanctioned for flight and EVA and I have always loved the Speedmaster aesthetics which drew me into the wider Omega story. If the 3861 supersedes the 861/1861a I am interested how it will be received in terms of flight and EVA qualification. The current movement has more than earned its Space spurs flying on with the ISS missions.
     
    bigone.jpg d7da1833f769562f34d79f53cbdc504a.jpg IMG_0075.JPG 521069-c29a298f1377ddb145508d87695c1577.jpg
  4. MTROIS Feb 16, 2020

    Posts
    1,993
    Likes
    6,997
    A few thoughts on the elements you are touching on:

    - is this movement, meaning the 1861, the most legendary in the lineage? Most people here on the forum will probably argue that it is surely the 321 which is (and to some extent the 861). Fortunately this basis is covered by the 321 re-edition... and all the vintage watches still available out there.
    - is the 1861 a very capable movement? I certainly believe it is WAY sufficient for the vast majority of us, and perhaps for everybody. No doubt!
    - will the 3861 be an improvement? From a resistance to magnetic fields, undoubtedly. From a precision and accuracy point of view, it seems so (Master certification by METAS?). From a longevity point I would imagine that based on the experience now acquired by Omega with the co-axial escapement-based movements, by now the answer is yes.... but horological experts can further chime in. I still wrestle with the idea of what is “good enough” and at what point, additional improvements become an exercise in style or academic exercise. Although I had this topic in general, it is for me like comparing an M16 to an AK47. Is the first one better than the second?? In many respects, yes. But when you look strictly at their ultimate purpose, I think that most people would argue that the latter is superior because of is ability to deliver in almost any situation. No matter what, TIME will tell in the very long run.
    - A key question for me is whether this never ending quest for better part of the natural human behavior to improve things or, in this particular case, is it essentially driven by marketing, financial (to charge much more) and competition reasons. I guess here again, the answer is likely YES, as Omega is a BUSINESS and thus needs to keep justifying why their product is worthy of customers’ trust and, in turn, hard earned money.

    This is all good, but people should probably be ready at a significant price increase for the upcoming new model. Fortunately, there are quite a few used models to acquire for reasonable money.
     
    Dale Vito likes this.
  5. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. Feb 16, 2020

    Posts
    17,045
    Likes
    25,211
    the 861 was recertified in 1978 for the STS program under the Alaska III ( prettt sure it was III) it’s still used by Russia on spacewalks, and worn by almost everyone save an occasional NASA astronaut during launch and landing in the current Russian launch and landing system aka Soyuz.

    if your interested in the original test Fratello has a good right up somewhere of the official NASA request for samples and tests.
     
    Omegafanman likes this.
  6. MTROIS Feb 16, 2020

    Posts
    1,993
    Likes
    6,997
    Quite frankly, if there is anything I wished Omega would be improving on, it would be mostly related to the bracelet of the watch (better build quality, micro adjustments,) the water resistance (build of the case, etc. Without implementing screw down pushers like the Daytona which actually get in the way of the purpose of a chronograph) or night time readability, rather than the movement itself.

    But perhaps we will be getting all at once this time around.
     
  7. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. Feb 16, 2020

    Posts
    17,045
    Likes
    25,211
    Omega Bracelets are great at their price point...
     
  8. Alfista88 Feb 16, 2020

    Posts
    265
    Likes
    404
    I've always liked the modern .005 bracelet as well. If there was 1 thing that tops my wishlist of Speedmaster improvements, it would be to "smooth out" the caseback so it doesn't leave deep imprints on soft skin. That protruding ring and hippocampus is an immense source of discomfort for some wrists, as we saw from a recent thread in which a fellow member asked about filing down the caseback.
     
  9. MauricioNO Feb 16, 2020

    Posts
    46
    Likes
    42
    I hope you are right! Fingers crossed that the next iteration won't be just a new movement. If they are going to increase the price, might as well throw in a ceramic bezel, applied logo and micro adjustment on the bracelet.
     
    Caliber561 and MTROIS like this.
  10. speedyproftw Feb 18, 2020

    Posts
    429
    Likes
    597
    My thoughts exactly on the bezel, applied logo, and bracelet, and I would be shocked if Omega doesn't do exactly what you suggest. The Tokyo 2020 Speedmasters come with a micro adjustment bracelet, so I can't imagine why Omega wouldn't continue doing that with the "new" bracelet. I'm not really a fan of the modern taperless bracelet design, so I hope they'll go back to the drawing board and create something fantastic for the new Speedy, maybe similar to the Apollo 11 50th Anniversary bracelet.
     
    MauricioNO likes this.
  11. Limited Feb 18, 2020

    Posts
    6
    Likes
    6
    They are moving to the 3861 an aim to turn the speedmaster into a more exclusive offering in the close future. I'm not sure about 1861 into Apollo XIII, probably they replay 3861
     
  12. STANDY schizophrenic pizza orderer and watch collector Feb 18, 2020

    Posts
    16,311
    Likes
    44,718
    Boy thats a lot of changes wanted on a watch that hasn’t changed much in 50 years. ;)
    50 meters WR is ok, you can go snorkeling with it already :whistling:
     
  13. rob#1 Feb 18, 2020

    Posts
    1,932
    Likes
    3,159
    :confused: Don’t start the ‘snorkelling’ discussion again! :eek:
     
    MTROIS likes this.
  14. MTROIS Feb 18, 2020

    Posts
    1,993
    Likes
    6,997
    You think so? Haha. Am I THAT demanding?? :cool:
    In any case, some of the “few” changes they made along the way we’re a let down IMO. Bracelets are a prime example: the holy grail bracelet 1450/809 I have one of my Speedies is amazing technically and visually and can at least be sized properly. ::love::

    In contrast, the most modern iteration of this bracelet that is on my Tintin (the ref. escapes me this second, but essentially the 1998 with screws in place of the pins) can now no longer use the half link that people use to borrow from the 2254.50 Seamaster Pro to put on the 1998/840. Consequence for me: sub optimal fit. :thumbsdown: ::rant:
    So, yeah, not “much” has changed, but sometimes the changes implemented were not for the best IMHumbleO, and in any case, IF it were perfect, why change anything then? :D
     
    Eve likes this.
  15. Burrogs Feb 18, 2020

    Posts
    64
    Likes
    71
    I heard recently that the 1861 and 1863 will no longer be produced, replaced by the 3861. I also got word that the sapphire sandwich will no longer be produced and that all SS moonwatches will have hessalite going forward. Only LEs and Gold moonwatches will have sapphire.
     
  16. brownwld Feb 18, 2020

    Posts
    320
    Likes
    1,242
    Agreed.
     
  17. STANDY schizophrenic pizza orderer and watch collector Feb 18, 2020

    Posts
    16,311
    Likes
    44,718
    I think I have the best of all with the three I have :thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:

    Radial dial, great lume and panda style
    ED82B3AB-C7F0-4354-8B25-5B7848751CDD.jpeg

    DON, applied Omega, steep dial, nice coffee coloured markers and Ultramen second hand.
    35034195-D31C-4AAB-A98C-E1B4B1439CC2.jpeg

    And classic becoming well worn

    8B5D5D66-A211-482F-A974-8EC869037080.jpeg


    It’s my opinion that the Speedy Tuesday 2 is the catch of any collection
    when you add up all the features
    Don
    Steep dial
    Applied Logo
    Colour of Markers
     
  18. MTROIS Feb 18, 2020

    Posts
    1,993
    Likes
    6,997
    Beautiful watches... but now I am bit confused:
    - you claim that not much has changed and the watch is good “as is” (I was assuming you were talking about the original classic Pro model), yet you sport two ST LE that clearly have been customized,
    - and you wear your original one on a strap, which I am sure you can size however you want, whenever I was talking about upgrading the SS bracelet design for better quality and functionality.

    I guess I must be missing something… ::confused2::

    Anyhow, let’s indeed add some pictures to this thread ;)

    F1663F58-6F99-4D33-9F72-6B47902B4102.jpeg
     
    STANDY likes this.
  19. STANDY schizophrenic pizza orderer and watch collector Feb 18, 2020

    Posts
    16,311
    Likes
    44,718
    I wear the bracelet and it fits me fine
    74CABBF2-08C5-4C1A-8949-2FD1416980BF.jpeg
    straps and NATOs are worn often.
    C5C31941-8436-43BA-8B9B-8D8465A698D0.jpeg

    I have never had a issue with the bracelet or the classic Moon watch. I just have the added flair of the two Speedy Tuesday’s because they are like potato chips (you can’t ever have just one)

    Then there is always blue days that need a 861 chrono.
    3032F081-880A-4767-9A51-1A5F2C17FCC5.jpeg
    B2A9A4F2-4E31-49BA-8FE0-2EA7620A575D.jpeg

    Sometimes it’s a two register day

    A36C8105-3637-4C1C-9655-60CA4F96C579.jpeg

    53181DC9-B620-416C-BBEE-2B7DAB9DA470.jpeg
     
  20. MTROIS Feb 18, 2020

    Posts
    1,993
    Likes
    6,997
    That Seamaster chrono on the mesh bracelet....::love::
    Thank you for sharing!!!

    It is only the "standard" bracelet on my Tintin that is too loose or too tight for my wrist but fortunately, the new bracelets on the LEs fit me great AND I also like (addictive) potato chips!!!:thumbsup:

    6F21BB9C-D710-4997-97C7-DE969D1971D7.jpeg
     
    Omegafanman and GadgetGuy88 like this.