RIP calibre 1861?

Posts
2,006
Likes
7,160
It would make Dave Scotts Bulova a Moonwatch.
 
Posts
2,006
Likes
7,160
Omega called the X-33 the Mars watch when it was introduced.
 
Posts
1,396
Likes
2,706
If the only true 'Moonwatch' are the watches that actually made it to the surface then everything else is just promotional blurb, isn't it? Maybe the new 321 Speedmaster will have a certificate stating that the watch has been 'Certified by Nasa as being a replica of the watches that were actually worn on the lunar surface'. 😀
 
Posts
331
Likes
195
If the only true 'Moonwatch' are the watches that actually made it to the surface then everything else is just promotional blurb, isn't it? Maybe the new 321 Speedmaster will have a certificate stating that the watch has been 'Certified by Nasa as being a replica of the watches that were actually worn on the lunar surface'. 😀
The 861 was on Skylab so that would make it a ‘Spacewatch’
 
Posts
259
Likes
632
It makes sense to me that NASA would recertify a new Speedmaster since it's the watch that would be worn during spacewalks. The X-33s are only worn inside spacecraft since they can't withstand the temperature extremes of outer space.
I’m assuming there needs to be a reason for NASA to desire a mechanical chronograph with an updated movement. James Ragan is gone. Someone needs to care enough to justify the project etc. I’m assuming there’s no groundswell in NASA to make it happen. 🙁
 
Posts
22
Likes
15
Omega is about a factor two behind Rolex in dollars per watch sold (~$3.5k/watch retail vs ~$8k), if I remember correctly. (Can't find the link where I read this first, but this New York Times article has similar numbers: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/15/fashion/watches-rolex-patek-philippe-omega.html .)
So doubling the average price seems like a reasonable strategy to catch up.

It's my humble opinion that Omega's watches are on par with Rolex. Omega's Co-Axial movements are every bit as good if not better than anything Rolex manufactures. So for now I'll be happy that Omegas sell for far less than Rolexes. 😀

That said I have to get my hands on an 1861 Speedy.
 
Posts
259
Likes
632
Was just at an OB and my SA said that the 1861 is definitely discontinued, meaning no more in production. -Others hear this?
 
Posts
200
Likes
291
Tend to agree. In U.K. I would expect retail to be about £5,500. For me the 3861 will not be a true speed master, just a marketing exercise by the Swatch Group. I will stick to the 861,1861. I think that Archer did a comparison between the 3861 and the 1861. The 3861 is a completely new movement. Where as the 1861 is a development of the 861. Thus the new watch may be a ‘speedmaster’ but not a ‘moonwatch’

Isn't the 1861 just a rhodium plated 861 without the Delrin brake?

To a pedant is anything other than a Cal.321 a "Moonwatch"?

I think the 321 is a true "Moonwatch" but an 861/1861 Speedmaster is still the only watch qualified for EVA by NASA, so that still makes it a special watch.
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,797
The transition into a new movement is unavoidable. It's the nature of progress. The 861 will remain a valuable "heritage" movement and those that carry it on their wrists will be even more proud to do so.

To stall progress for the sake of a few (because we are not that many) old chaps an our nostalgic tendencies makes no sense.
 
Posts
133
Likes
87
Wasn't the Swatch Group going to have trade events next month, which I understand have been cancelled due to the coronavirus? That would be the time to announce the new 3861 Speedmaster, along with the long awaited Apollo 13.
Yeah, they cancelled the Time to Move event, originally scheduled for March in Zurich. If I remember last year correctly, though, they embargoed all the press, including photos, until May-ish. I don't remember there being any public announcements during or immediately after the event. They might have planned on debuting something, but we wouldn't have heard about it until later.

They said they would do regional events later this year, but who knows what that will mean for product releases.
 
Posts
346
Likes
1,040
I think we may need to start calling the 3861 a pre-Mars...at least that would likely be where the marketing will be heading
 
Posts
2,006
Likes
7,160
Isn't the 1861 just a rhodium plated 861 without the Delrin brake?



I think the 321 is a true "Moonwatch" but an 861/1861 Speedmaster is still the only watch qualified for EVA by NASA, so that still makes it a special watch.
Indeed, very true.
 
Posts
2,006
Likes
7,160
The transition into a new movement is unavoidable. It's the nature of progress. The 861 will remain a valuable "heritage" movement and those that carry it on their wrists will be even more proud to do so.

To stall progress for the sake of a few (because we are not that many) old chaps an our nostalgic tendencies makes no sense.
Change 3 of those numbers and the same thing happened in 1968.
 
Posts
331
Likes
195
I think we may need to start calling the 3861 a pre-Mars...at least that would likely be where the marketing will be heading
I thought that it would be a ‘pre moonwatch 2’ as the next scheduled moon landings are in 2024/2025
 
Posts
18,202
Likes
27,530
Its pretty much confirmed that the 861 will be replaced with the 3861 in the next year or so.
 
Posts
70
Likes
59
Its pretty much confirmed that the 861 will be replaced with the 3861 in the next year or so.
I am really looking forward to that. Nothing against the legendary movement, is just that I really like the speedmaster by itself, regardless of the movement it is carrying, and I'd really like a more robust movement, one that I wouldn't have to worry about wearing next to a big speaker and have it magnetized.
Having said that, I can only hope the price doesn't go up like crazy 😜
 
Posts
18,202
Likes
27,530
I am really looking forward to that. Nothing against the legendary movement, is just that I really like the speedmaster by itself, regardless of the movement it is carrying, and I'd really like a more robust movement, one that I wouldn't have to worry about wearing next to a big speaker and have it magnetized.
Having said that, I can only hope the price doesn't go up like crazy 😜

my understanding is that anti mag will not change much... also it’s a robust movement that was made for 50 years. It’s more robust then a 321 and no one complains about how bad those 50 year old movements are or how much of an issue magnetism is for them.
 
Posts
29,672
Likes
76,831
my understanding is that anti mag will not change much... also it’s a robust movement that was made for 50 years. It’s more robust then a 321 and no one complains about how bad those 50 year old movements are or how much of an issue magnetism is for them.

The 3861 is a 15,000 gauss rated movement...